Another Donald Trump joke

A Mexican, a Muslim, and Donald Trump Are Walking Down a Beach…

An illegal Mexican immigrant, a radical Muslim, and Donald Trump were walking together on a beach in Florida when the Mexican stumbled over a bottle in the sand.


He picked up the bottle, rubbed the sand off it, and a genie appeared.


“I can only grant three wishes,” the genie said.

“Since there are three of you, you may have a wish each.”


Pointing at the Mexican, he said, “Since you found the bottle, you may have the first wish.”
The Mexican said, “This country is racist against my people! I wish to take everyone of Mexican descent back to our homeland where we can finally be happy and live in peace!”


The genie clapped his hand and the illegal Mexican immigrant was transported to Mexico will millions of “his” people.
Turning to the radical Muslim, the genie asked, “And what is your wish?”


The radical Muslim said, “This country is bigoted against those who practice Islam! I wish to take all of my people away from this horrible place loaded with infidels so we can live in peace in Muslim countries and serve Allah.”


This genie clapped his hands and the radical Muslim, along with every other Muslim in the country, was instantly transported to the Middle East.


Turning to Donald Trump, the genie asked, “And what is your wish?”


Trump looked around at the empty beach, smiled, and said, 

“Just give me a Pepsi. It doesn’t get any better than this!”

Get ready to be raped...

THE SUDDEN RAPE OF THE WEST
AND HOW IT AFFECTS YOU

The current massive influx of supposed "refugees" into Europe is
having surprise-packed consequences.

1. Terrorists are pouring in with the flood of refugees.
2. Military aged men make up an estimated 70 % of the "immigrants".
3. They are determined to make Europe into what they want it to be.
4. There are almost daily reports of new rapes and gang rapes
   occurring throughout Europe.
5. While rape has always existed, what is happening now is new for
   our day. While rape has always followed war, this is something
   new - using rape as a tool of war.

Bill White, writing for Survivopedia, correctly notes that "Sweden
has become the rape capital of Europe and perhaps of the world, if
we leave out the lands controlled by ISIS."  
http://www.survivopedia.com/the-rise-of-rape-and-islam/?source=
newsletter

CAN YOU GUESS WHY?

The Muslim invaders apparently feel they have a right to any woman
they see.

This matches the teaching of their Imams and the Quran which states
that all lust is caused by women; it is not in the heart of the man.
Therefore the women are the ones who cause it.

In a recently published video, a female Muslim professor states that
the rape of non-Muslim women is acceptable in the Muslim religion.
It is to be used as a means to humiliate the women, the ultimate goal
being to force them to convert to Islam. There is even a reference
to the woman being converted by the sexual act.

Her specific statements refer to raping women captured in war, but
the invasion of Europe is a war in Muslim eyes.

The Quran commands Muslims to go to other lands and take the
position of being the heads over the people of the land. They are not
to put themselves under the authority of "infidel" non-Muslims or
their laws. That is a sin. They are to take over the lands.

This is called hijrah. It is as old as Islam itself. The first hijrah
was when Muhammed himself left Mecca to go to Medina. He and his
followers went there for the purpose of conquest, to take Medina and
force its population to convert to Islam.

This was the beginning of hijrah as a means of conquest. It has been
used ever since.

The Trojan Horse of the so-called Syrian "refugees" is not just the
terrorists who are hidden among them, but each and every Muslim. It
matters not if they are terrorists. They are all committed to the
spread of Islam. Refugees are being used as an excuse to send
millions of people into the western world for the purpose of conquest.

CAN A SMALL GROUP CONQUER A NATION?

A ridiculous statement, that such a small group could conquer a
nation?

The truth is, they have already taken over areas of several European
countries, and made them into "no-go" zones. Those areas are totally
under Muslim control and are governed by Sharia Law. The police and
the elected government of the nation have no power and no say. They
have, in effect, been kicked out. The area has effectively been
conquered.

This has been done with relatively few people, mere thousands.

What will happen when there are millions more?

Will fighting-aged male jihadis come to your city where they can wreak
havoc, just as thousands of Muslim “refugees” did in Germany,
Switzerland and Sweden on New Year’s Eve, 2016?

Hundreds of women were raped, robbed and beaten across Europe on New
Year’s Eve by the Syrian, Iraqi and other Islamic “refugees” who have
flooded into those nations.

How will those governments stand against Muslim pressure, when the
"moderate" Muslims know exactly which buttons to push in order to get
things their way?

Muslims comprise almost a quarter of the world's population - 1.6
billion persons.

WHAT THE PROFESSOR SAYS

You might wonder, how could it ever be that hundreds of women were
raped, robbed and beaten across Europe on New Year’s Eve by the
Syrian, Iraqi and other Islamic “refugees” who have flooded into
those nations?

Listen to this.

An Islamic professor has allegedly claimed Muslim men are allowed by
Allah to rape non-Muslim women in order to “humiliate” them.

Professor Saud Saleh – from Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt –
reportedly said rape is allowed between times of “legitimate war”
between Muslims and their enemies.

In a television interview Saleh appears to try to discourage the
purchase of slaves from Asian countries for sex, claiming Allah has
given Muslim men a “legitimate” way to have sexual relations with
slave women.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/635942/Islam-Scholar-Saud-Saleh-
Cairo-Slavery-Muslim-Women-Pagan-ISIS-Al-Azhar-University Egypt?utm_
source=traffic.outbrain& utm_medium=traffic.outbrain&utm_term=traffic.
outbrain&utm_content=traffic.outbrain&utm_campaign=traffic.outbrain

Attacks like those already occurring are going to increase.

While they are mostly in Europe right now, you can expect them soon
to be closer to where you are.

As United States president Obama allows more and more into the USA,
it is well to keep in mind that they are not coming as refugees, nor
as immigrants. They are coming as a conquering army. And, as far as
they are concerned, they have already won the war and your women
are the spoils of that war.

WORLD-CHANGING EVENTS
POISED READY TO BREAK

, if you didn't know, events have started to happen in
Europe, USA and Australia right now that are set to change the
world overnight.

EVENTS ARE CATCHING UP
WITH THE PROPHECY

Big upheavals are coming to your life and that of your family
members.

ASSAULT RIFLES PROTECTED UNDER 2ND AMENDMENT

Federal appeals court rules ‘assault rifles’ are protected under 2nd Amendment

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Friday, 5-Feb-2016 17:08:22

The ruling states that modern sporting rifles such as AR and AK platforms are not ‘unusual’ or especially dangerous and are, in fact, in common use in the United States as defensive weapons. The same argument applies to standard capacity magazines. These firearms are, therefore, protected under the Second Amendment for civilian use. It sent the lower court’s ruling back for reevaluation. This is a big deal. A Federal appeals court dealt a potentially serious blow to Maryland’s landmark 2013 gun control law and similar measures across the country, ruling Tuesday that a lower court was wrong when it upheld the state’s ban on assault rifles. In a 2-1 decision applauded by gun rights advocates, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit concluded that the semiautomatic weapons and high-capacity magazines banned by Maryland’s Firearm Safety Act “are in common use by law-abiding citizens.” As a result, they don’t fall under the exception to the right to bear arms that applies to “unusual” weapons such as machine guns and hand grenades, the court said. Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh said Thursday that the decision “conflicts sharply with rulings of other federal appellate courts.” Frosh said he would appeal — either to the full 15-member 4th Circuit or to the U.S. Supreme Court. The lower court must now use “strict scrutiny” to uphold the Maryland law banning the rifles and magazines. This is a very difficult, but not impossible, hurdle for the court to jump. More to come. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/federal-appeals-court-rules-assault-rifles-protected-under-2nd-amendment/152959#more-152959

Presidential Candidate

 

My husband hasn`t worked for the last 14 years . All he does is get dressed
in the morning and hop in his fancy car to visit his cronies . I know he`s
cheated on me many times with young girls who could be his grand daughters .

 

I know because he brags about this to me  . He smokes fancy cigars and
drinks the most expensive Champagne day and night .

 

We sleep in separate beds because he`s always telling me he knows I`m a lesbian and my varicose veins and hairy back turn him off !

Should I clobber him with my frying pan, or should I leave him , Abby ?
Your advice would be appreciated .....
         

Mad as Hell

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Mad as Hell,

 

You don`t have to take that kind of treatment from any man . I suggest you
pack your bags and move out a.s.a.p!   

 

Don`t resort to clobbering him with the frying pan , and try to act like a lady !

Remember ....... you`re running for President of the United States , so try
acting like one !

 

          Abby

 

GUN CONFISCATION EMINENT...

They're back . . . 

Today, lawmakers return to Washington, D.C. from spring break, and as I warned you yesterday, I'm very worried an anti-gun storm is brewing on the horizon. 

In fact, that storm could hit this week.

That's because Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is facing increased pressure to hold a vote on Attorney General nominee, Loretta Lynch. 

Lynch is President Obama's pick to succeed disgraced anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder, and she's shown no signs she'd reverse Holder or Obama's anti-gun agenda.

Henry, your actions and your petitions have held back this questionable nominee so far. 

I hope I can count on your activism again. Will you call your U.S. Senators right away? 

*** You can reach Sen. Daniel Sullivan at (202) 224-3004; and,

*** You can reach Sen. Lisa Murkowski at (202) 224-6665.

Urge them to OPPOSE Loretta Lynch for Attorney General. 

Your actions right now could set the tone on Capitol Hill for the entire week. That's why I hope you'll make these calls as soon as you get this message. 

For Freedom,

-- Dudley Brown, President
National Association for Gun Rights 

---

 

Dear Fellow Patriot,

Thanks to a groundswell of grassroots opposition from NAGR members and supporters, the confirmation of Barack Obama's handpicked candidate for Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, remains in doubt.

But that doesn't mean the fight is over.

In December when I first alerted you to Lynch's impending nomination, insiders on Capitol Hill didn't seem to think she would have difficulty getting confirmed.

Then NAGR's more than four million members and supporters began to take action.

January, February and March passed.  Your calls, emails, fax petitions and letters didn't let up.

Last month, after Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell indicated there would be a vote to confirm Lynch, he had to back off because of your grassroots efforts, and the Senate adjourned for Easter without taking a vote.

But our work is far from over.

On Monday, Joe Biden sent out an angry directive to left-wing activists imploring them to do whatever must be done to get Lynch confirmed.

When the Senate returns in a little more than a week, expect this fight to heat up again.

Lynch's anti-freedom record is atrocious . . .

During her Capitol Hill confirmation hearings, she refused to answer direct questions about your Second Amendment rights, yet she called anti-gun provisions in the PATRIOT ACT, "constitutional and effective."

She served on an "Advisory Committee" to Eric Holder during his gun-smuggling operation, "Fast & Furious."

And while a U.S. Attorney in New York, she used a process known as civil asset forfeiture to seize private property -- a process that state has used to confiscate firearms from deceased concealed permit holders.

Now isn't the time to let up the heat on Republican Senators urging them to OPPOSE Lynch's nomination.

Don't wait until tomorrow to take action.

Please sign your BLOCK LORETTA LYNCH EMERGENCY FAX PETITION to be delivered by NAGR staff on Capitol Hill.

HOORAY 53 TO 46 Needs to go viral...

Both Washington Traitors voted against the Constitution. 

Good info!!!

Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 4:54:33 PM
Subject: Fwd: HOORAY – a 53-46 vote

---

Subject: Fwd: FW: HOORAY – a 53-46 vote

King George of England made a tactical error before the American Revolutionary War. 

He should have had British troops in the American colonies confiscate all the firearms of the American colonists starting in 1770 and he probably would have created the biggest British Colony  for England.

 

I wanted to pass this one on.  So important to protect our rights!   Have a great day.                                     

   

The U.N. Resolution 2117  lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most  interest is point number 11.   It: “CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all UN  countries”. 

 

By a 53-46 vote - The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution.   HOORAY !!!!!

 

This is that brief, glorious moment in history

when everyone stands around...reloading. 

 

Now, Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy Us? Well, let their names become known ! See below . If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46 traitors”… vote  against them. 

 

In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the Senate Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty."

 

The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the  import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all  private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry, now get this, on all private guns and ammo.

 

Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 united States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power.

 

Here are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.:

 

Baldwin (D-WI)         

Baucus          (D-MT)

Bennett          (D-CO)

Blumenthal    (D-CT) 

Boxer          (D-CA)

Brown          (D-OH)

Cantwell    (D-WA) In lock step with obama!

Cardin          (D-MD)

Carper          (D-DE)

Casey          (D-PA)

Coons          (D-DE)

Cowan          (D-MA)

Durbin          (D-IL)

Feinstein       (D-CA)

Franken          (D-MN)

Gillibrand       (D-NY)

Harkin          (D-IA)

Hirono          (D-HI)

Johnson          (D-SD)

Kaine          (D-VA)

King          (I-ME)

Klobuchar    (D-MN) 

Landrieu       (D-LA)

Leahy          (D-VT)

Levin          (D-MI)

McCaskill      (D-MO)

Menendez      (D-NJ)

Merkley          (D-OR)

Mikulski          (D-MD)

Murphy          (D-CT)

Murray     (D-WA) In lock step with obama!

Nelson          (D-FL)

Reed          (D-RI)

Reid          (D-NV)  Murray's best buddy!

Rockefeller  (D-WV)

Sanders       (I-VT)

Schatz          (D-HI)

Schumer      (D-NY)

Shaheen       (D-NH)

Stabenow     (D-MI) 

Udall          (D-CO)

Udall          (D-NM)

Warner       (D-VA)

Warren          (D-MA)

Whitehouse    (D-RI) 

Wyden          (D-OR)

 

Folks: This needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns. They need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed. 46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

 

Please send this to SOMEONE 

 

BOAT FOR SALE TO BUILD CHURCH...

I HAVE A 36-FOOT BRYANT FIBERGLASS LANDING CRAFT. I am over age 70 and too crippeled with arthritis to do much with the boat. It would make a lot of money chartered to one of the oil companies for standby oil spill cleanup. The doors open up in front to carry large objects.

It can carry a pickup truck or six four wheelers for a big cariboo hunt. You could load it up with deer meat on Kodiak Island or moose on the west side of Cook Inlet in Chinitna Bay or Point Harriet. It sleeps two but if you removed the engines and installed two large outboard motors you could extend the cabin aft to sleep six more people.

It is powered with two V-8, 350 cubic-inch, Chevys. I would install two 220 hp Cummings diesels or two 300 hp Yamaha outboard motors. 

It has a 12-mile radar, two VHF transmitters, two sounders, and a CB radio. It comes with lots of fishing gear and a fifty pound bucket of halibut jiggs. 

I want $35,000.00 and plan to use the money to build a church.
Call 907 740-0386
e-mail: hankkroll@yahoo.com

PS. We pressure washed the entire boat after the pictures were taken. To build a new landing craft like this one would cost you over $300,000.00. 

You got to send this to someone!!!

HOORAY a 53-46 vote:

It's about time a list of name of people in the Congress is made public who think up stupid things to put in law and vote for them.

DEAR FRIENDS,

HALLELUJAH... HALLELUJAH... HALLELUJAH.

HOORAY; a 53-46 vote.  Hooray nothing, that's 7 votes, these people have to go.  The U.N. Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most interest is point number 11.  It:“CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all UN countries”.

By a 53-46 vote - The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution.

HOORAY.

This is that brief, glorious moment in history while everyone stands around... reloading.

Now, Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy Us?  Well, let their names become known!  See below..  If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46 “legislators” vote against them.

In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the

United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

The Statement of Purpose from the Senate Bill reads:

“To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.”  The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the 0bama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms.  The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S.  and had language that would have implemented aninternational gun registry, now get this, on all private guns and ammo.

Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away your Constitutional rights to a foreign power.

Here are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.

Baldwin (D-WI)

Baucus (D-MT)

Bennett (D-CO)

Blumenthal (D-CT)

Boxer (D-CA)

Brown (D-OH)

Cantwell (D-WA)

Cardin D-MD)

Carper (D-DE)

Casey (D-PA)

Coons (D-DE)

Cowan (D-MA)

Durbin (D-IL)

Feinstein (D-CA)

Franken (D-MN)

Gillibrand (D-NY)

Harkin (D-IA)

Hirono (D-HI)

Johnson (D-SD)

Kaine (D-VA)

King (I-ME)

Klobuchar (D-MN)

Landrieu (D-LA)

Leahy (D-VT)

Levin (D-MI)

McCaskill (D-MO)

Menendez (D-NJ)

Merkley (D-OR)

Mikulski (D-MD)

Murphy (D-CT)

Murray (D-WA)

Nelson (D-FL)

Reed (D-RI)

Reid (D-NV)

Rockefeller (D-WV)

Sanders (I-VT)

Schatz (D-HI)

Schumer (D-NY)

Shaheen (D-NH)

Stabenow (D-MI)

Udall (D-CO)

Udall (D-NM)

Warner (D-VA)

Warren (D-MA)

Whitehouse (D-RI)

Wyden (D-OR)

What?  No Republicans????

Folks:

This needs to go viral.  These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns.

They need to lose their next election.  We have been betrayed.

46 Senators Voted to Give your Constitutional Rights guaranteed by the 2^nd Amendment to the U.N.

What constitutional right will be next??

Please send this to SOMEONE!

You could go to jail if you loan a gun to a friend...

The "most popular" part of the defeated-but-sure-to-come back Senate gun control bill (background checks) sounds like a good idea at first but is more restrictive than anyone anticipated and will have significant unintended consequences.

There is a huge push to get it through Congress before the public has a chance to consider its contents.

Common activities that we take for granted will become federal crimes. These are not irresponsible exaggerations. Please take a moment to review the requirements of the bill.

Here are a few examples of the restrictions in the bill:

EXAMPLE #1

Loaning your buddy a shotgun for a duck hunting trip will be considered a transfer. If the following requirements are not met, YOU HAVE BOTH COMMITTED A FEDERAL CRIME.

1. He must have already purchased his hunting license

2. Season is already open (and will not close before he returns it)

3. He cannot travel with the firearm through a county where season is not yet open or any area where hunting is prohibited and certainly not across a state line.

He CANNOT stop by your house on the day before season opens, pick up the shot gun, go to the sporting goods store to buy a license and shells then drive out to the hunting lease. In this scenario, YOU BOTH WOULD HAVE COMMITTED MULTIPLE FEDERAL CRIMES, YOUR WEAPONS WILL BE FORFEITED AND YOU WILL LOOSE YOUR RIGHT TO BUY OR OWN A FIREARM.

EXAMPLE #2

It appears that only you may relocate your weapons. If your weapon leaves your home without you, the new legislation considers it a transfer of possession. ALL transfers require going through a firearms dealer, paying the transfer fee and a background check for the transferee.

Putting the weapon, even temporarily in someone else's possession, requires a transfer through a dealer. There is no exception for putting them in a friend's truck while moving to your new house or packing them unloaded, locked in a gun safe into a moving truck.

Any scenario in which your weapon leaves your home without you is considered a transfer. Failure to properly transfer the weapon is a federal crime which can result in a prison term AND WILL RESULT IN THE FORFEITURE OF YOUR WEAPON.

In the scenario above, your buddy's truck was used to commit a federal crime and WILL BE CONFISCATED just like with current Fish and Game violations.

EXAMPLE #3

Infractions as above which involve 2 guns of any type are considered weapons trafficking. You will be prosecuted under the same federal laws as a terrorist arms dealer.

EXAMPLE #4

Any of the infractions above (or hundreds of other routine scenarios) may result in federal charges, confiscation of ALL your weapons and being prohibited, like all felons, from ever owning a weapon again.

Please read the text of the bill yourself. Most of it is boring legalese but the sections on transfers and trafficking are critical.

Take a minute to think about all the routine activities like those above that will make you a federal criminal and result in prison time plus the confiscation of your weapons and other property.

A link to the bill is included below on the official Senate website. See Section 122 "Firearms Transfers".

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113:S.649:

Read it and call your congressman's office. Talk to their staff. Tell them how you feel about this.

Keep in mind, none of the above would have stopped the tragedys in Columbine or Newtown . The proposed law makes you a criminal and opens the door for confiscation of your weapons and property for otherwise routine activities.

Think and act. Congress does not expect that you will do either.

If you found the patience to read the entire text, you also learned that exactly $100 million per year of your tax money is set aside to enforce these restrictions.

Finally, please forward this to your friends who may be affected.

Who were those guys with guns???

Subject: Who Were Those Bad Guys With Guns?

Commentary from Paul R. Beane on KFYO radio on 1/24/2013: Good afternoon, I'm Paul R. Beane, and I'm your right-wing gun nut. You know me and my fellow gun owners are responsible for all the carnage in our streets and our schools. Never mind that Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my entire collection of firearms. Most of which I have owned since childhood, when I saved my pennies and nickels in order to purchase them, and each and every one is in perfect working order. It is the responsible gun owners of today who are being blamed for all the shootings. Obama calls us the right-wing gun nuts, clinging to our guns and to our religion. But let's take a little closer look. The Fort Hood shooter is a Muslim and a registered Democrat. The Virginia Tech shooter wrote hate mail to George Bush and his staff and was a registered Democrat. Aurora Colorado shooter was a staff worker on the Obama campaign and took part in Occupy Wall Street. He was a progressive liberal and guess what? A registered Democrat. The Newtown, Conn, shooter hated Christians and was a registered Democrat. The Columbine highschool shooters were too young to vote, but both of their families were progressive liberals and registered Democrats. And one more thing...not a single one of these killers was a member of the National Rifle Association. So I have got it figured out how to make this country much safer; leave the guns alone and lock up all the Democrats! I'm Paul R. Beane, and that's the way I see it!