> Electing Hillary Clinton president would be like granting Satan
> absolution and giving him the keys to heaven!
> Amazing to me how much I have forgotten!
> When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority
> over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she
> couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress. This
> fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for
> studies, promotion, and other efforts.
> Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female
> attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba
> Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration.
> Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her selection as “my
> worst mistake.”
> Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh
> and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in
> dozens of deaths of women and children.
> Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of
> the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her selection. When a
> little probing led to the discovered of Ms. Guanier’s radical views,
> her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.
> Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some
> more recommendations.
> She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department,
> Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the
> Treasury Department.
> Her selections went well:
> Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and
> Kennedy was forced to resign.
> Many younger voters will have no knowledge of “Travelgate.” Hillary
> wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry
> Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She
> managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their
> reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month
> Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the
> enormous crime of mixing
> Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend
> a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director
> of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the
> improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate)
> and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary
> and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course,
> denied knowledge of drug use in the White House.
> Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office
> after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.
> Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual
> harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the
> “bimbo eruption” and scandal defense. Some of her more notable
> decisions in the debacle was: She urged her husband not to settle the
> Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with
> Ms. Jones. She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led
> to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80
> million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led
> to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting
> his affairs.
> Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to
> practice law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury and then his
> subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.
> Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice
> during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have
> no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under
> After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an
> estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that
> she had stolen. What a swell party – ready for another four or eight
> year of this type low-life mess?
> Now we are exposed to the destruction of possibly incriminating emails
> while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of
> the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next. But
> to her loyal fans - “what difference does it make?”