Friday, November 21, 2014

NOT A JOKE...

Subject: WAL-MART VS. THE MORONS..(NOT A JOKE)

This is quite interesting.
Even if you do not forward it, read it all the way to the end...
1. Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart Every hour of Every day.
2. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute!
3. Wal-Mart will sell more from January 1 to St. Patrick's Day (March 17th) than Target sells all year.
4. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot + Kroger + Target +Sears + Costco + K-Mart combined.
5. Wal-Mart employs 1.6 million people, is the world's Largest private employer, and most speak English.
6. Wal-Mart is the largest company in the history of the World.
7. Wal-Mart now sells more food than Kroger and Safeway combined, and keep in mind they did this in only fifteen years.
8. During this same period, 31 big supermarket chains sought bankruptcy.
9. Wal-Mart now sells more food than any other store in the world.
10. Wal-Mart has approx 3,900 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are Super Centers; this is 1,000 more than it had Five years ago.
11. This year 7.2 billion different purchasing experiences Will occur at Wal-Mart stores.(Earth's population is Approximately 6.5 Billion.)
12. 90% of all Americans live within fifteen miles of a Wal-Mart.
You may think that I am complaining, but I am really laying the ground work for suggesting that MAYBE we
should hire the guys who run Wal-Mart to fix the economy.
This should be read and understood by all Americans?? Democrats, Republicans, EVERYONE!!
To: President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature It is now official that the majority of you are corrupt and ineffective:
a..The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775. You have had 237 years to get it right and it is broke.
b..Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 77 years to get it right And it is broke.
c..Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 74 years to get it right and It is broke.
d.. War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 48 years to get it right;$1 Trillion of our money is confiscated each year andTransferred to "the poor"
..........And they only want more.
e.. Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 47 years to get it right and they are broke.
f..Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 42Years to get it right And it is broke.
g.. The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen Our dependence on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000
Employees with a budget of $24 billion a year and we Import more oil than ever before. You had 35 years to get it right and
it is an abysmal failure.
You have FAILED in every "government service" you Have shoved down our Throats while overspending our tax dollars.
AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO BELIEVE YOUCAN BE
TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE
SYSTEM??
Folks, Keep this circulating. It is very well stated. Maybe it will end up in the e-mails of some
of our "duly elected' (they never read anything) and their staff will clue them in on how Americans feel.
AND We have lost our minds to "Political Correctness" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We're "broke" & can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, Homeless etc.,? BUT -- In the last months we have provided aid to Haiti , Chile , Japan
and Turkey ..And Pakistan........previous home of Bin Laden. Literally, BILLIONS of DOLLARS!!!
Our retired seniors living on a 'fixed income' receive no extra aid nor do they get any special breaks -- nadda beyond shopping discounts...
Now, it is estimated that 90,000 illegal alien children under the age of 16 will be in our country by the end of the year. We will feed them, provide health
and education and they will get everything a hard working American citizen gets - just for crossing the border illegally.
Obama is proposing we give millions of dollars to El Salvador, Hondouras and Guatamala to "help" the children. Do you really think this money
is going to get to the children that really need it? Meanwhile, Mexico is charging for allowing them to pass through Mexico to get to the US border,
paid for by the drug cartels. They are keeping the Border Guards busy changing diapers while the drug lords funnel tons of drugs into the
US to turn our children into zombies.
In GITMO, the 147 Muslim terrorists have one doctor for every prisoner, a state-of-the art hospital system, are provided Korans
and prayer rugs, food approved by the Koran, exercise and additional perks.
Our Veterans die waiting to see a VA doctor while the directors get bonuses.
AND Congress wants to freeze Social Security payments !



99% of people won't forward this. I'm one of the1% -- I Just Did

Sunday, November 16, 2014

HOW TO CONTROL A NATION...

Does this sound familiar to you? Think Obama administration.


Saul Alinsky died about 42 years ago, but his writings influenced those in political control of our nation today.......

Recall that Hillary did her college thesis on his writings and Obama writes about him in his books.

Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, Ca
Education: University of Chicago
Spouse: Irene Alinsky
Books: Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals

Anyone out there think that this stuff isn't happening today in the U.S. ?


All eight rules are currently in play.

How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky:

There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important.

1) Healthcare Control healthcare and you control the people

2) Poverty Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3) Debt Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5) Welfare Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)

6) Education Take control of what people read and listen to take control of what children learn in school.

7) Religion Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools.

8) Class Warfare Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

Does any of this sound like what is happening to the United States ?

Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin's original scheme for world conquest by communism, under Russian rule. Stalin described his converts as"Useful Idiots." The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control. It is presently happening at an alarming rate in the U.S.
If people can read this and still say everything is just finethey are useful idiots.
"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

ICE AGES


Pacific SEAPORT THAT HAD BEEN THRUST 12,000 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL.

Titicaca, at 12,000 feet altitude, it is the highest navigable lake in the world. But did you know that 12,000 years ago Titicaca was on sea level?

MOUNTAINS RAISED “RECENTLY”
It is popularly speculated that mountain uplifts occurred over millions of years, until about a million years ago. But listen to the eminent geologist Bailey Willis, regarding the Asian mountains: “The great mountain chains challenge credulity by their extreme youth.” (Bailey Willis, Research in Asia. II, p.24)

On the former surf line of the raised beaches at Valparaiso, Chile, now at 1,300 feet, the seashells are not even decayed - a clear indication of a “recent” up thrust. Geologist J.S. Lee reports convincing evidence that “the mountain ranges in western China have been elevated since the Glacial Age.” (J.S. Lee, The Geology of China, p.207)


In Kashmir, Helmut de Terra found deposits of a sea bottom at an elevation of 5,000 feet or more and tilted, at an angle of 40 degrees. And the shock is that: “These deposits contain Paleolithic [‘Old Stone Age’] fossils.” (Arnold Heim and August Gousser, The Throne of the Gods, An Account of the First Swiss Expedition to the Himalayas, p.218) The fact is that this change occurred in historical times, “however fantastic changes so extensive may seem to a modern geologist.”

Citing extensive evidence, Immanuel Velikovsky concludes that “the great massif of the Himalayas rose to its present height in the age of modern, actually historical man. . . With their topmost peaks the mountains have shattered the entire scheme of the geology of the ‘long, long ago’.” (Velikovsky, Earth in Upheaval, p.76)

A shock indeed! It can be demonstrated that the mountain chains of the Caucasus, China, Tibet, the Rockies, the Alps and the Andes all rose to their present heights in historical times. We have the same “late” dating from all parts of the earth.

THE ANDES RANGE
At 11,500 feet, a curious whitish streak runs along the side of the mountain range for over 300 miles. It is composed of the calcified remains of marine plants. This shows that these slopes were once part of the seashore. In fact, many lakes up in the Andes region are completely salt. One such lake is Titicaca.

A watermark of salt along the lake shore now runs at an angle to the water level. Originally it must have been horizontal. Clearly the land was not only thrust up to its present altitude, but was tilted in the process. Not only is the water saline. On the beach of this lake high in the mountains, there are seashells as well as traces of seaweed. The lake must have been a bay or inlet of the sea. Even today, various sea creatures (including sea horses) survive in the lake.

Today this lofty, almost sterile region is capable of sustaining only a scant population. Yet here we are confronted with a colossal mystery. Traces of a huge city lie at the southern side of the lake. In the fifteenth century, Spanish conquistador Cieca de Leon reported his astonishment at seeing ancient gateways hewn from solid stone 30 feet long and 15 feet high and pivoting.

These ruins of Tiahuanaco, in Bolivia, are extensive. It is obvious that a great city once existed here. But here is the mystery. At an altitude of 13,000 feet, maize will not bear fruit. Yet endless agricultural terraces, now abandoned, rise as high as 18,400 feet above sea level, and continue up under the snow to some unidentified altitude.

Such an abundance of cornfields must have supported a huge population. The region is too high and too barren to do this now. Could the site once have been lower? You see, if the Andes were 2- to 3,000 feet lower than now, maize would ripen around Lake Titicaca and the city of Tiahuanaco could support the large population for which it was evidently built.

ONCE A SEAPORT
But here is an even greater surprise… the remains of an ocean quay. That’s right, an ocean quay. It suggests that the city, when built, was at sea level - 12,500 feet lower! The remains near the stadium of Tiahuanaco show five distinct landing places. The harbors have dredged holes and a canal which heads inland. The docks are vast - and one wharf is big enough to take hundreds of ships. So we’re faced now with a sea harbor at 12,500 feet altitude and 200 miles inland! Staggering, isn’t it? Well, someone says, perhaps these gigantic docks were intended for ships on Lake Titicaca. Good try. But I’ll tell you why not.

You see, they face in the opposite direction from the lake. Not only that the mooring rings on the stone piers were so large that they could only have been used by ocean-liner sized vessels. This place - I tell you - was a seaport on the Pacific coast. AND IT WAS THRUST, SO TO SPEAK, TWO MILES INTO THE SKY! Now, how about that? You’ve probably heard it said that mountain making took “long ages”. That in the case of the Andes (the second highest mountain range on earth), it occurred more than a million years ago.

Well, I’m sorry to be a spoil sport. But the change in altitude occurred AFTER the city was built. I would suggest about 4,000 years ago. And since only a few intermediate surf lines can be detected, the elevation could not have proceeded little by little.

The explorer Colonel H.P. Fawcett, who travelled this region early last century, was persuaded by the evidence that Tiahuanaco had been destroyed by the terrible seismic upheavals which accompanied the raising of the Andes to their present height. (Fawcett, Exploration Fawcett: The Travel Diaries and Notes of Colonel H.P. Fawcett) And I believe he got that right.

WORK INTERRUPTED
There is some evidence that the monoliths of the city were not entirely finished when the catastrophe struck and suddenly raised the whole city and lake 12,500 feet. Cast-down builders’ tools were found in the ruins when the Spaniards came upon the place in the 16th century. The heaps of blocks of masoned stone bear evidence of sudden abandonment… men fleeing for their lives, taken by surprise.

After the disaster, the populace lay buried in gullies that had become mass graves, covered by silt. Fragments of skeletons, both of animals and men, lay scattered among the ruins. Jewels, pottery and tools were found mixed in utmost confusion. This massive uplifting exposed a continental shelf which is now the desert lowlands of Peru and northern Chile.

WITNESSED BY SURVIVORS
In the traditions of the Ugha Mongulala tribe of the western Amazon jungle, the South American continent was “… still flat and soft like a lamb’s back, … the Great River still flowed on either side.” But then came a cataclysm: “The Great River was rent by a new mountain range and now it flowed swiftly toward the East. Enormous forests grew on its banks… In the West, where giant mountains had surged up, people froze in the bitter cold of the high altitudes.” (Karl Brugger, The Chronicle of Akakor, 1977)

Upswellings of other mountains may have been as violent. These were never forgotten by the inhabitants.For example, the Washo Indians of California say their ancestors witnessed the uplifting of the North American sierras from the plains. Various other tribes of the Americas likewise recall in their oral history the memory of new mountains being raised and others flattened. (Velikovsky, Worlds in Collision, p.102)

RELIEF FROM STRESS CONTINUES
After the Great Flood of 2345 BC, it took the earth’s crust millennia to settle down. During the tectonic adjustments, lava continued to flow. Isolated areas of land were submerged or raised thousands of feet.

Today these effects are being felt only to a comparatively minor degree. Still, it should be mentioned that even in modern times, the ocean has been known to raise or lower its islands or its depths, as much as thousands of feet. No need to invoke long evolutionary periods. THE EARTH’S SURFACE CAN CHANGE RAPIDLY. There are many recent examples of rapid up or down thrusts.

LAND RISES 4,000 FEET - IN OUR 21ST CENTURY
During the earthquake which occurred off the northern tip of Sumatra on December 26, 2004, the sea bottom in the Straits of Malacca uplifted almost 4,000 feet in only about 3 minutes.
The US-based National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which analyses spy satellite imagery and produces maps and charts for the Defense Department, was reported to have received information that one area of the Straits of Malacca, which separates Malaysia from the Indonesian island of Sumatra had its depth cut from 4,060 feet to 105 feet.

In another affected area, a merchant marine ship logged that the depth was cut from 3,855 feet to just 92 feet. (Star newspaper, Kuala Lumpur, January. 13, 2005, quoting a report in the shipping journal, Portsworld.)

The US Navy reportedly sent two ships to re-chart the waters. Sonar images from British navy ship HMS Scott showed the massive uplift of a large area 10 kilometers wide and up to 1.5 kilometers high (4,800 feet plus).
Yes, land CAN rise or sink quickly… even in our day. It does NOT require millions of years. Besides various continents rising and falling 11,720 years ago, (date determined by two Norwegians  studying Antarctic Ice core graphs) The entire continent of Antarctic was pushed up several thousand feet, Additionally, heaps of bones were piled up on the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia. All the camels, horses and mastodons in North America were suddenly exterminated. There were no more horses in North America until the Spaniards brought them over in the 15th Century. Whole mastodons were quick-frozen with green food in their mouths and in their stomachs.
FROM A RADIO INVERVIEW I DID WITH Mark Schneider Ohio Exopolotics:

If we have time I also want to talk about Robert Shoch’s examination of the stone city near Lake Titicaca. He mentions several authors who have speculated about how the ancient cities were raised up over 11,000 feet… 

Tiahuanaco
Dr. Robert Schoch, Ph. D. (of Egyptian Sphinx dating fame) has become a regular contributor to Atlantis Rising magazine. In the May/June 2013 issue his article WHERE ATLANTIS MEETS LEMURIA he examines the ancient ruins of Tiahuanaco and Puma Punku.

“…there are also persistent stories of ancient, now extinct animals depicted in the carvings that decorate some of the stone work at Tiahuanaco. In particular, it is claimed that toxodons are depicted on the Sun gate/ this would be incredibly significant if true, as toxodons (an animal indigenous to South America that looked a bit like a cross between a rhinoceros and a hippo) are generally believed to have gone extinct about 14,500 years ago. (shortly before the close of the last ice age) but these supposed depictions of toxodon heads are not convincing to me. I am not sure what they represent.” 

“Other arguments for the extreme age of Puma Punku have been proposed by the archeolo-astronomical studies of Arthur Posnansky (1873 – 1946). In particular he was convinced that onf of the major structures at Tiahuanaco known as the Kalasasaya, was a solar temple.  He observed that when one )stands at the center of the west wall of Kalasasaya … the north and south pillars of the east wall are so located that the sun would rise at the solstices on the outer corners of these pillars . . . Now then if at the solstices, one observes the sunrise without the aid of instruments, it will be noted that it does indeed still come up on the corners of these pillars. However, if we examine this phenomenon with precision instruments, we note a difference of approximately eighteen minutes [of arc, or 0.3 degrees], which represents the change in the obliquity of the eclipse between that of the period in which the Kalasasaya was built and that which is has today” (see his 1945 book, Tiahuanaco The cradle of American man, vol. 2 p.88).
Using the best analysis of his day on the changing obliquity of the ecliptic, Posnansky estimated that his portion of Tiahuanaco dates back an astounding 17,000  (circa 15,000 BCE).

Dr. Schoch writes: “A single catastrophic event perhaps a fly-by or hit of an asteroid, could have shifted Earth’s axis and caused the discrepancy. Or if Lake Titicaca and Tiahuanaco were suddenly and catastrophically given a new geographic  and topographic position (FOR INSTAQNCE A SUDDEN DRAMATIC RISE OF THE Andes), then this could surely account for the “misalignment” of the temple.”

The German novelist, architect, and archeologist Edmond Kiss (1886 – 1969), and H. s. Belamy. (possibley a pseudonym if Han Schindler, (1901 – 1982) and his colleague Peter Allan, reinterpreted Tiwanaku in terms of geological  theories of Austrian engineer Hans Hoeberger (1860 – 1931). In his Wellteislehre (world Ice Theory); also known as Glazial Kosmogonie [Glacial Cosmology]), Horbiger postulated (among other things) that before Earth captured its present Moon, there were other satellites that acted as moons, each of which spiraled closer and closer to Earth over periods of millennia before exploding, disintegrating, or impacting Earth and causing cataclysms  on our planet. At different epochs with different “moons our Earth had different numbers of days in the year and differing numbers of revolutions of the then current moon around Earth.

I take it Robert Schoch hasn’t read my book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES where we used online computers to compute impact forces necessary to tilt Earth 23.5 degrees and raise Puma Punka up 12,000 feet from sea level in 15 minutes.

Furthermore, depending on the position of the current moon relative to Earth, it would affect ice accumulation (expanding ice ages), the levels of the oceans in different parts of the world due to gravitational effects, and so forth. All in all, those authors argued, Horbiger’s theory could explain the cataclysmic destruction of Tiahuanaco; and furthermore it would date the site to a much older period, a period prior to earth’s capture of our current Moon.

I concur with Robert Schoch’s analysis on this point. It took me three years of web searches to find the book IN THE BEGINNING by Immanuel Velikovski where the ancient Greeks talk about a time on Earth when there was no moon. (Chapter 3). To read the book type the first words of the bible into Google, “IN THE BEGINNING.”

Bellamy and Allan took the analysis even further. In two detailed monographics they analyzed the Sun Gate and the Great Idol (a magnificent monolithic, red sand-stone statue found in Tiwanaku which stands over seven meters [over 24-feet tall] as ancient calendars.

By their interpretations, the calendar on the sun gate records a time with a different satellite other than our Moon, when the year consisted of 290 days, whereas the calendar of the Great Idol records a yea consisting of 288 days. Utilizing various assumptions and extrapolations (see their 2959 book, The Great Idol of Tiahuanaco), Bellamy and Allan ultimately concluded that Tiahuanaco reached its height about twenty-seven thousand years ago and was destroyed when the then Moon disintegrated circa twenty-two-thousand years ago. This they refer to as the first civilization f humankind. In terms of our previous discussion, might we think of as the Lemurian Civilization.

Post Tiahuanaco time, Bellamy and Allan speculate that “The Second Civilization.” Which they explicitly suggest might be equated with Atlantis, developed during a period when Earth lacked a moon, circa twenty-two thousand years ago to around thirteen thousand five hundred – even eleven thousand five hundred, years ago.

[I agree with Robert Schoch on this as my research discovered where two Norwegians studying Antarctic ice core graphs came up with a time that Earth came out of the last Ice Age of 11,720 years ago. This fits within Bellamy and Allan’s time line.]          

“This period ended catastrophically with the capture of our present Moon, which marked the destruction of Atlantis, in terms of classical geology the end of the last Ice Age. Finally according to these authors, after a hiatus of thousands of years, “The third and last Civilization,” of which we are members, arose first in Egypt and Samaria bout 7,000 to 6,000 years ago.

Certainly these ideas are controversial, and I am not her endorsing them, but I find them fascinating and worthy of further consideration even if many of the details may be questionable. Robert Schoch writes, “I do not believe we have fully explained the mysteries of Tiahuanaco.”

I firmly believe Robert Schoch is on the right track. It is heartening to me to see other scientists trying to explain the mysteries of Puma Punku and Tiahuanaco. I hope to make him aware of my impact research and the light sources that take Earth out and in to Ice Ages…

Nothing in the main stream history books can explain all off these sudden cataclysmic events. I and several others don’t believe our Moon was not in the sky prior to 11,720 years ago.
Darwin also was convinced the Moon had not been up there for many millions of years and ran the math backward. He could get no closer to Earth than fifty miles. My co-author and I thought that the moon was actually bounced off the Earth and it had a 20-mile deep coating of ice covering the Maria. (The black Maria facing Earth have very few crater impacts so something was protecting them.)     

In my book COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES I used an online impact computer Arizona EDU/Impact effects. I put the mass of the Moon in there 7.35 e20 kilograms, the mass of the earth 5.98e24 kilograms, a speed of 2 kilometers per second and an angle of 11 degrees (space shuttle re-entry angle). The impact data that came back is it would depress the Earth’s crust five kilometers and it would bounce back up to 1.3 kilometers. The force of the impact would be about 700-terramegatons.

The average depth of the Arctic Ocean is 1.3 kilometers and there is one area that is 5 kilometers deep. The shape of the Arctic Ocean is roughly circular and one third the diameter of the Moon. The Moon impact would explain the extinction of all the animals in North America and the freezing of the mastodons.

Apparently we had summers and winters prior to the arrival of our modern Moon because the Earth was in a more elliptical orbit around the sun. The year was 360 days—the same number of degrees in a circle. Is this where the 360-degree circle came from? The Earth’s oceans weren’t very productive and there was little land available for large populations of humans and animals because it was in Ice Age. Ice caps extended down to northern Florida and Kansas. Ice covered the Greenland and the British Isles as far south as Spain. The California redwoods were spared and most of Alaska was not covered with ice as mastodons and horses roamed freely. The actual rotational pole was near the southern tip of Greenland. See the maps in my book COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES.
  
The force of the impact was transmitted around the liquid core of the earth forcing the continents of South America and Antarctica up several thousand feet in a few minutes.  

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Earth's finite resources

            Life-support shortage?

In 1600 Queen Elizabeth I and a few intimates founded the East India company. Exercising her crown privileges the Queen granted the company limited liability for losses on the part of the enterprise backers. They could lose their money if the ship were lost, but they could not be held liable for the lives of the sailors who were drowned. While the owners could insure and very greatly limit the magnitude of their losses, the sailors and their families could not.
“Ltd.”—limited, in England—and “Inc.”—incorporated in the U. S. A.—and other similar legal definitions in all capitalist countries constitute “for ages uncontested” –ergo, custom-validated and legal-judgments-upheld-royal decrees greatly favoring ig-money capitalism over the mortal, breadwinner-loss-taking vast majority of the poor.
Elizabeth’s East India Company scheme was to have her national navy (and armies) first win mastery of the world’s sea-lanes. This advantage would thereafter e exploited by her privately owned enterprise. This scheme became of the first of such national power structures bids for establishing and maintaining world-trade supremacy through dominance of the world’s ‘high seas’ ocean currents’, trade winds’, critical straits’, and only-seasonably-favorable passages’ world-around line of vital and desirable supplies. All the other world-power-stature individuals who vied for supreme mastery of the world’s high seas lines of supply also operated invisibly through monarchs and nations over whom they had sufficient influence.
Through such behind-the –throne influence the influenced nation’s resources could be politically maneuvered into paying for building and operation pf the navies and armies that would seek to establish and protect their respective privately owned enterprises.
With the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805 the British Empire won “the world’s power structures championship” and became historically the first empire “upon which” it is said, “the sun never sets”. This is because it was the first empire in history to embrace the entire spherical planet earth’s 71-percent maritime, 29-percent landed, wealth-producing activities. All precious empires—Genghis Khan’s, Alexander the Great’s, the Roman Empire, et al,-- were all land areas surrounded by the unknown. The British Empire was the world’s first spherically closed finite system.
Building and maintaining the world’s most powerful navy, The British Empire was to maintain its sovereignty of the world’s oceans for 113 years.
In 1800 Thomas Malthus, later professor of political economics of the East India Company College, was the first human in history to receive a comprehensively complete inventory of the world’s vital and economic statistics. The accuracy of the pre-Trafalgar 1800 inventory was verified by a similar world inventory taken by the East India Company in 1810. In a later post-Trafalgar—book Malthus confirmed in 1810 his 1800 finding that world-around humanity was increasing in numbers at a geometrical progression rate while increasing its life-support production at only an arithmetical progression rate, ergo, an increasingly majority of humans would have to live out their short years in want and misery.
“Pray all you want” said Malthus, “it will do you no good. There is no more”
A half-century later Darwin expounded his theory of evolution, assuming that nature’s inexorable processes were the consequences of “the survival only of the fittest species and individuals within those species.”
Karl Marx compounded Malthus’s and Darwin’s scientifically convincingly conclusions and said, in effect, “The worker is obviously the fittest to survive. He is the one who knows how to handle the tools and seeds to produce the life support. The opulent others are ‘parasites’.
The opulent others said, “We are opulent because we demonstrate Darwin’s ‘fittest to survive.’ The workers are dull and visionless. What is needed in this world is big-thinking enterprises, courage, cunning, and fighting skill.”
For the last two centuries these two ideologies have dominated the political affairs of world-around humanity. Each side says you may not like our system, but we are convinced we have the ‘fittest’, fairest, most ingenious, way of coping with the lethal inadequacy of life support operative on the planet, but because there are those who disagree diametrically on how to cope, only all-out war can resolve which system is fittest to survive.”
Those in supreme power politically and economically as of 1980 are as yet convinced that our planet Earth has nowhere nearly enough life support for all humanity. All books on economics have only one basic tenet—the fundamental scarcity of life support. The supreme political and economic powers as yet assume that is has to be either you or me. Not enough for both. The hat is why those in financial advantage fortify themselves even further, reasoning that unselfishness is suicidal. That is why the annual military expenditures of the U.S.S.R., representing socialism and the U.S.A. representing private enterprise have averaged over $200 billion a year for the last thirty years, doubling it to $400 billion –making a thus-far-total of six trillion, money spent in developing the ability to kill ever-more people, at ever-greater distances, in ever-shorter time.

If that money had been spent developing newer and better methods of agriculture and colonizing other planets such as Mars and the Moons of Jupiter there would be no threat of a life-support shortage. There is plenty of real-estate out there for those with enough ambition, intelligence and guts to go get it. Get up off your haunches…   

Saturday, November 8, 2014

YOUR MONEY IS UN-CONSTITUTIONAL...

Most people think that Federal Reserve notes are American money. But are they? Congress was created by several states of the Union, via the national Constitution, so it is SUBJECT to that Constitution. And while that Constitution gives it power to COIN MONEY, banknotes are NOT coins, and they're NOT money. They're a mere CURRENCY, and mere PROMISORY NOTES. Why do you think there's a signature of the US Treasurer and the secretary of the Treasury on them? Those signatures validate those notes as PROMISES to pay, by the two organizations that those two persons represent; Federal Reserve System and Dept. of Treasury.

So if Congress doesn't issue FRNs under its power to coin money, where does it get the authority to issue those? Some would want you to believe that since Congress has the Constitutional authority to borrow money on credit of United States, it also has power to emit bills (banknotes) into circulation using the borrowed money. But it CAN'T, since no such power was given to Congress. In fact that power was in Articles of Confederation, but WAS SPECIFICALLY REMOVED when Constitution was created (see below).

So the ONLY POSSIBLE power under which Congress could "emit bills" (based on the borrowed money) into circulation, is Congress's unlimited power over 10-square mile area of District of Columbia!!! So FRNs are PRIVATE "money" of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, A.K.A. the United States.
And that's FOREIGN to the United States of America (the Republic).

So I hope that you realize that Federal Reserve notes are:
1) Mere Promises to Pay
2) Issued by a PRIVATE bank
3) NOT American/national money of the Republic (lawful money)
4) Currency of the FEDERAL gov't, AKA the Legislative Democracy of the District of Columbia (legal tender)

So the ONLY way FRNs would be Constitutional, is if they're used in District of Columbia and territories. In states of the Union they're UNCONSTITUTIONAL, since they're FOREIGN CURRENCY.

If Federal Reserve is a central bank, not a national bank, then it only makes sense that FRNs are PRIVATE currency, not a national one. Furthermore where did Juilliard get the idea that power to borrow money on credit of US ALSO includes power to issue circulating notes on the money borrowed? It did NOT. The only way they could do that would be if those notes issued would be an INTERNAL currency between the banks, which I believe FRNs originally were (between 1913 and 1933), or were internal currency of D.C..

So Congress's power to borrow money on credit of US DOES NOT includes power to issue circulating notes on the money borrowed, as that power was SPECIFICALLY removed from the US Constitution, See below.

In other words, issuance of debt notes FRNs into circulation is unconstitutional, and would only be legal under Congress's unlimited power over areas under its exclusive jurisdiction, i.e. the District of Columbia. In other words, FRNs are a PRIVATE currency of the federal gov't, NOT a national currency of USA.

So FRNs are a currency of the federal gov't, so it is NOT American/national money, as America, which is a Union of 50 sovereign states, does NOT include the District of Columbia, That is just a separate territory (not a state), over which Congress has an EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction.

So they might be "lawful money" in federal areas (corporate Democracy), but not in states of the Union (dejure Republic). And by "lawful money" here I mean a valid currency, NOT real national lawful money.

In other words, FRNs are NOT national currency, but only a private (domestic) currency of District of Columbia, so if you're not a federal subject, AKA US person, you're entitled to redemption of that private scrip in national currency such as US notes.

Here's a short article that explains why Congress does NOT have power to 'emit bills' based on the borrowed money:
"The original draft of the Constitution reported to the convention by its Committee of Detail empowered Congress “To borrow money and emit bills on the credit of the United States.”625 When this section was reached in the debates, Gouverneur Morris moved to strike out the clause “and emit bills on the credit of the United States.” Madison suggested that it might be sufficient “to prohibit the making them a tender.” After a spirited exchange of views on the subject of paper money, the convention voted, nine States to two, to delete the words “and emit bills.626 Nevertheless, in 1870, the Court relied in part upon this clause in holding that Congress had authority to issue treasury notes and to make them legal tender in satisfaction of antecedent debts.627"

When it borrows money “on the credit of the United States,” Congress creates a binding obligation to pay the debt as stipulated and cannot thereafter vary the terms of its agreement. A law purporting to abrogate a clause in government bonds calling for payment in gold coin was held to contravene this clause, although the creditor was denied a remedy in the absence of a showing of actual damage.628
625 2 M. FARRAND, THE RECORDS OF THE FEDERAL CONVENTION OF 1787 144, 308–309 (rev. ed. 1937).
626 Id. at 310.
627 Knox v. Lee (Legal Tender Cases), 79 U.S. (12 Wall.) 457 (1871), overruling Hepburn v. Griswold, 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 603 (1870).
628 Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330, 351 (1935). See also Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571 (1934).
http://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-1/19-borrowing-power....

And it does seem to me that destroying US Notes or blocking them from circulation would be criminal, as it would deny people their right to PAY OFF the national debt, and thus leave them in a PERPETUAL DEBT, which equates to INVOLUNTARY SLAVERY.

I mean, if our use of FRNs makes us liable for the national debt, then we OBVIOUSLY should have the power to REPAY/REDUCE the principal of that loan from Federal Reserve, via the 12USC411 demand for lawful money.

And if the Treasury destroys US Notes, it FORCES on us a PERPETUAL DEBT that we're NOT ALLOWED to repay. And that IS SLAVERY.
***********************************

When you think about it, it's pretty obvious that FRNs are a PRIVATE currency, since it says "FEDERAL RESERVE notes", not "UNITED STATES notes". I.e. they're issued by Federal Reserve (a PRIVATE bank), and the Treasury seal on them just means that US is the COSIGNER for that negotiable instrument. It could also be a bill of exchange, but those usually don't have a signature of the Payor on them.

So it's just a PROMISORY NOTE issued by a PRIVATE bank, and cosigned by the Dept. of Treasury. Which means it is NOT lawful money or national currency, and no one can be forced to use it as money. And if you aren't liable to use it, you're entitled to redeem it in real, national money (gold and silver coins), or, if US is bankrupt, then in national currency which is backed by the US Treasury (thus making you a creditor of US, rather than the FedRes).

And obviously, when you sign a promisory note, you, or the organization you represent, is LIABLE to PAY IT ON DEMAND. And when you don't, you're basically a CRIMINAL, just as if you gave someone a check, well knowing that there's no money in the account to cover it.

***********************************




And here's how Congress deceived the American people by creating FEDERAL STATES such as CA, FL, TX, etc. and ZIP codes that also designate federal areas. In other words, Congress does NOT have jurisdiction in states of the Union (except for interstate commerce), so its agencies would have to REGISTER as FOREIGN AGENTS when operating in states of the Union. They don't register that way. And the way they get around that is by convincing everyone that they're living in CA, TX, WA, NY, etc. and in a federal ZIP code, which are federal areas, so they don't have to register as foreign agents, because YOU GRANT THEM JURISDICTION by admitting to live in CA, FL, NY, etc, and in a ZIP code (=federal area).

THE JOKE'S ON YOU...

The Clintons

Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 3:50 PM
Subject: Fw: FW: The Clintons

Clinton's 20 Acre - $11 million mansion Read how the joke's on us!
Hillary Rodham Clinton, as a New York State Senator now comes under this fancy
"congressional retirement staffing plan" which means that if she never
gets re-elected, she STILL receives her Congressional salary until she dies. If Bill out-lives her, he then inherits HER salary until he dies. He is already getting his Presidential salary until he dies. If Hillary out-lives Bill, she also gets HIS salary until she dies, Guess who pays for that? WE DO!
>>>>>>>> It is common knowledge that in order for her to establish NY residency,
they purchased a million dollar-plus house in upscale Chappaqua, New
York...makes sense. They are entitled to Secret Service protection for life. Still makes sense. Here is where it becomes interesting. Their mortgage payments hover around $10,000/month. But an extra residence had to be built by
the government on the acreage to house the Secret Service Agents. Any
improvement to the property is owned by the property owners...the
Clinton's. So...the Clinton's charge the federal government $10,000 monthly rent for the use of the extra residence to house the Secret Service staff which is just about equal to their mortgage payment.
>>>>>>>> He is the ONLY ex-president to use this loophole. This means that we, the taxpayers, pay the Clinton's, salary, mortgage, transportation, safety and security as well as the salaries for their 12 man staff and it is all perfectly
legal.
>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> When she runs for President, will you vote for her? How many people will YOU send this to?
May God supply you abundantly with His amazing grace.
blessings,
Cd 

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

A GERMAN'S VIEW ON ISLAM...

Hard to argue with this:
A German's View on Islam - worth reading.
This is
one of the best explanations of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. His references to past history are accurate and clear. Not long, easy to understand, and well worth the read.
The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist.
A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.

'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come.’ ‘My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'

‘We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is a religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff meant to make us feel better, and meant somehow to diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.’

‘The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honour-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.’

‘The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China 's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.’

‘The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda , which collapsed into butchery? Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

‘History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.’

‘Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.’

‘Now Islamic prayers have been introduced in Toronto and other public schools in Ontario , and, yes, in Ottawa , too, while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?). The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.’

‘In Australia , and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items have the halal emblem on them. Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food items in your local supermarket. Food on aircraft have the halal emblem just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding within the nation's shores.’

‘In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of "no-go" zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuse to acknowledge British law.’ ‘As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts - the fanatics who threaten our way of life.’

Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand.
Extend yourself a bit and send this on. Let us hope that thousands world-wide read this, think about it, and send it on before it's too late, and we are silenced because we were silent!!!

Monday, November 3, 2014

THE AFFECTS OF FLUORIDE TOOTHPASTE...


ONE Recently, when I went to McDonald's I saw on the menu that you could have an order of 6, 9 or 12 Chicken
McNuggets. I asked for a half dozen nuggets.
'We don't have half dozen nuggets,' said the teenager at the counter.
'You don't?' I replied.
'We only have six, nine, or twelve,' was the reply.
'So I can't order a half dozen nuggets, but I can order six?'
'That's right.'
So I shook my head and ordered six McNuggets (Unbelievable but sadly true...)
TWO
I was checking out at the local Walmart with just a few items and the lady behind me put her things on the
belt close to mine. I picked up one of those 'dividers' that they keep by the cash register and placed it between our things so they
wouldn't get mixed. After the girl had scanned all of my items, she picked up the 'divider', looking it all over for the bar code
so she could scan it. Not finding the bar code, she said to me, 'Do you know how much this is?'
I said to her 'I've changed my mind; I don't think I'll buy that today.'
She said 'OK,' and I paid her for the things and left. She had no clue to what had just happened.
THREE
A woman at work was seen putting a credit card into her floppy drive and pulling it out very quickly. When I inquired
as to what she was doing, she said she was shopping on the Internet and they kept asking for a credit card number, so she was using the ATM 'thingy.' (keep shuddering!!)
FOUR
I recently saw a distraught young lady weeping beside her car. 'Do you need some help?' I asked.
She replied, 'I knew I should have replaced the battery to this remote door unlocker. Now I can't get into my car. Do you think they
(pointing to a distant convenience store) would have a battery to fit this?'
'Hmmm, I don't know. Do you have an alarm, too?' I asked.
'No, just this remote thingy,' she answered, handing it and the car keys to me.
As I took the key and manually unlocked the door, I replied, 'Why don't you drive over there and check about the batteries. It's a long walk....'
PLEASE just lay down before you hurt yourself !!!
FIVE Several years ago, we had an Intern who was none too swift. One day she was typing and turned to a secretary and
said, 'I'm almost out of typing paper. What do I do?'
'Just use paper from the photocopier', the secretary told her. With that, the intern took her last remaining blank piece of paper, put it
on the photocopier and proceeded to make five 'blank' copies.
Brunette, by the way!!
SIX A mother calls 911 very worried asking the dispatcher if she needs to take her kid to the emergency room, the kid had
eaten ants. The dispatcher tells her to give the kid some Benadryl and he should be fine, the
mother says, 'I just gave him some ant killer......'
Dispatcher: 'Rush him in to emergency!'
Someone had to remind me, so I'm reminding you too. Don't laugh.....it is all true...
Perks of reaching 50 or being over 60 and heading towards 70!
01. Kidnappers are not very interested in you.
02. I n a hostage situation you are likely to be released first.
03. No one expects you to run--anywhere.
04. People call at 9 PM and ask,"did I wake you?"
05. People no longer view you as a hypochondriac.
06. There is nothing left to learn the hard way.
07. Things you buy now won't wear out.
08. You can eat supper at 4 PM.
09. You can live without sex but not your glasses.
10. You get into heated arguments about pension plans.
11. You no longer think of speed limits as a challenge.
· 12. You quit trying to hold your stomach in no matter who walks into the room.
13. You sing along with elevator music.
14. Your eyes won't get much worse.
15 . Your investment in health insurance is finally beginning to pay off.
16. Your joints are more accurate meteorologists than the national weather service.
17. Your secrets are safe with your friends because they can't remember them either.
18. Your supply of brain cells is finally down to manageable size.
19. You can't remember who sent you this list.
20. And you notice these are all in Big Print for your convenience.
Forward this to every one you can remember right now!
Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night 

Sunday, November 2, 2014

BOAT FOR SALE TO BUILD CHURCH...

I HAVE A 36-FOOT BRYANT FIBERGLASS LANDING CRAFT. I am over age 70 and too crippeled with arthritis to do much with the boat. It would make a lot of money chartered to one of the oil companies for standby oil spill cleanup. The doors open up in front to carry large objects.



It can carry a pickup truck or six four wheelers for a big cariboo hunt. You could load it up with deer meat on Kodiak Island or moose on the west side of Cook Inlet in Chinitna Bay or Point Harriet. It sleeps two but if you removed the engines and installed two large outboard motors you could extend the cabin aft to sleep six more people.


It is powered with two V-8, 350 cubic-inch, Chevys. I would install two 220 hp Cummings diesels or two 300 hp Yamaha outboard motors. 



It has a 12-mile radar, two VHF transmitters, two sounders, and a CB radio. It comes with lots of fishing gear and a fifty pound bucket of halibut jiggs. 



I want $35,000.00 and plan to use the money to build a church.
Call 907 740-0386
e-mail: hankkroll@yahoo.com

PS. We pressure washed the entire boat after the pictures were taken. To build a new landing craft like this one would cost you over $300,000.00.