MOON DEPOSITS FROZEN METHANE?
Scientists would like to have everything fit into neat little packages so they say that all the planets in our solar system were all formed at the same time when the sun was formed. So far everything astronomers have looked at in our solar system is different from everything else. Everything looks like it was brought in from some other system. Obviously planet swapping is a common thing. The scientific paradigm is being broken every day. This latest moon theory of mine will put me in the loony bin for sure. Pun intended! ☺The real funny part is that my friend, Brad Guth and several other people who I have showed the data to agree with me.
After studying the May 2006 issue of National Geographic ® map some more the question came to mind:
"How did all that frozen methane get down there under the earth's crust?" "How did the frozen methane get buried under the ocean floors all over the world?" There is no way methane could freeze and stay frozen on the earth's surface. How can it remain frozen when it is buried deep in the earth's crust where it is supposed to be hot? It had to be brought in from some place else. It has been noted that some of the moons in our solar system are covered with a thick layer of methane ice.
Europa orbits Jupiter once in exactly the same amount of time that it takes to complete one rotation and therefore keeps a single face toward the planet at all times. Does this sound like our moon? It is estimated that Europa is covered with a 100 kilometer deep ocean of slushy ice. The moon's orbit is not a completely smooth ellipse because Europa is pulled by the gravity as it passes by the nearby moons Ganymede and Io, other moons around Jupiter. Gravitational forces flex the interior thus keeping it warm.
Pictures taken by the Galileo Orbiter indicate that geysers erupt along the cracks in the ice suggesting that Europa has an ocean of water underneath and scientists think that Europa may actually harbor life in its' deep ocean. The spacecraft's magnetometer recorded regular changes in the direction of Europa's magnetic field that correspond to fluctuations in Jupiter's magnetic field according to it position. This suggests that Europa has an underlying material that conducts electricity, such as a salty ocean! There is more than one salty moon in our solar system and where did they come from? Given the aforementioned data there is a good chance that our moon may have had a salty ocean before it collided with earth and since our moon is bigger than Europa it could have had a thicker coating of ice-in the neighborhood of 200 kilometers.
ICE ON OTHER PLANETS AND MOONS
There are ice rings around the planet Saturn. There are also ice rings around Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune. The asteroid Vesta, is the brightest. It is so shiny that it must be covered with ice. Saturn and Uranus also have icy satellites. Comets, like Halley's Comet, have very long and elliptical orbits. Nereid, one of Neptune's moons, has a very elliptical orbit.
Saturn's moon, Enceladus that is 310 miles in diameter erupts plums of water vapor and ice particles that smooth its surface and replenishes the E-ring. Thethys, Dione, and Rhea also have thick coatings of ice. Titan which is much larger than Mercury may have a rocky core, possibly surrounded by a "mantel" and "crust." In other words, is may exhibit a structure similar to that of Earth. It has a dense atmosphere, weather erosion, and pools of liquid methane. In fact, it is the only known planetary satellite with a dense atmosphere-possibly denser that that of Earth. -[Science from New Worlds, NASA CORE Central Operation of Resources for Educators slide program and script.]
Our moon's mass is 7.35E22 kg and is about 384,000 km from the earth. These figures were from http://www.seds.org/billa/tnp/datamax.html.
FROZEN METHANE IS NOT FROM THIS PLANET
The only way to make frozen methane on a small planet or moon is to create a strong methane and water atmosphere using anaerobic microorganisms. Then put that planet out into the vast cold of space so the atmosphere freezes into ice. If someone has a better solution we would like to hear it.
My French, Scientist and Chemist friend, Jean Linares writes, "I have read attentively your very interesting document about where the moon came from. I share with you the fact that the frozen methane is not from this planet and your explanation about the probable process (a combination of helium-4 with carbon during the gigantic impacts of the icy moon is correct-by transmutation of chemical elements (Kervran Effect)."
A PLANETARY CRIME
Our moon came in at a low angle to earth of ten to twenty degrees, looking much like Europa; a ball of rock 2160 miles in diameter covered with a layer of frozen methane and saltwater 150 kilometers deep, with a thick methane atmosphere of its own. At this point in time the earth's atmosphere was somewhat thicker. Brad Guth found a mention that early earth billions of years ago had an atmospheric pressure of 50 bars, which is 725 pounds per square inch. We mention early on in this book that scientists measured the chest cavities of dinosaurs to discover that they could not exist in today's atmosphere because their lung capacity was too small for their body mass. It was then postulated that the atmospheric pressure had to have been around thirty pounds per square inch at the time of the dinosaurs 140 to 160-million years ago. After reviewing the ancient atmospheric pressure figures it become apparent that earth is loosing its atmosphere.
As our icy moon came into the thick atmosphere of earth the moon's ice covering would have cushioned the blow. The polar icecap on earth would also have had some cushioning effect. The heat from atmospheric friction pealed off massive chunks of ice the size of West Virginia, Rhode Island and New York striking the earth creating the long chain of lakes as it traveled northwest into Canada. Giant "spaceburgs" of methane and water fell off the moon making Lake Superior, Lake Winnipeg, Lake Churchill, Lake Athabasca, Great Slave Lake and Great Bear Lake. These huge lakes were laid down in a slightly curved line to the southeast due to the moon's parabolic ascent into orbit. This curve is more evidence that they were made by falling spaceburgs because the angel of climb lessened as it departed earth. All the lakes are irregular in shape with sharp edges as if made by large chunks of ice. If they were made by glaciers the corners would be rounded. Shards of methane and water ice dropped at low altitude made these lakes.
There is some glacier material laying on the surface but this may have been deposited by ice ages that covered the northern hemisphere at a later date. We need to determine the depth of these lakes and compare them with each other to see if they were formed in the same way. If they are the approximately the same depth to width ratio then there is a good possibility they were formed the same way and there may even be frozen methane underneath.
If the chain of lakes extending from the Arctic Ocean to the Great Lakes is a result of the southern extent of the polar ice cap as most geologists say and not the result of falling ice then one can determine where the north rotational pole was during the ice age by placing a drawing compass on a globe. You open the compass up to the point where the radius of the compass matched the curve of the lakes and place the other end on the globe. The north rotational pole was 23.5 degrees further south placing it very near Iceland. By tilting the Earth it doubled the amount of grazing land and increased the productivity of the world's oceans by 100 %.
Please review copy of map with North Pole on the coast of Greenland east of Iceland. If you subtract 23.5 degrees inclination from 90 degrees present position of the pole it comes out to where the old rotational pole of the earth was near the Arctic Circle west of Iceland on the Greenland coast. I wanted to know where the rotational pole was before the moon hit so I took child's circle maker-compass and lined up the circle with the radius of the Great Lakes, Great Bear Lake and Lake Victoria which geologists say was the southern extent of the ice sheet during the last ice age. If you put the center of the circle maker west of Iceland at 23.5 south and continue round it pretty much matches the southern extent of the ice during the last ice age in Europe as well.
Several years after I wrote the book more data came out about the southern extent of the ice during the last Ice Age. The ice cap extended south as far as Georgia and northern Florida but the California coast redwood trees were spared. The high altitude mountain ranges were covered with glaciers but the coastal areas of Alaska and interior were open grass land. Small salmon runs spawn at the mouth of rivers. I have stone tools and chisels that were made by giant humans that lived at the mouth of these small streams during the last Ice Age. In one area there is a stone house with a stone table and stone chairs. The chairs are much to big for modern humans to sit in because your legs wouldn't touch the floor. Sea levels were 300-feet lower at the time so it would be possible for people to walk the coastline from Russia to the Americas.
The vacuum behind the moon as it came in must have exceeded 800 mile per hour ripping up many thousands of square miles of forests. Any tribes of hunter-gatherers living in the area were buried alive along with tons of trees and other debris. The Navajo and Sioux tribes in the southwest who were in a position to observe and understand what was happening to them went underground to avoid the catastrophe. Tribal legends speak of living underground for a very long time and coming back to the surface when the cataclysm was over. Five and a half thousand years passed before the first archaeological records show human habitation on Kodiak Island in Alaska.
After our moon plunged into the Arctic Ocean (creating the Arctic Ocean) there was total chaos for several thousand years such as extreme earthquakes and volcanism all over the earth. Vast herds of animals were picked up by the wind and dumped in heaps while others were flash-frozen with green leaves still in their mouths while looking up to the sky. They actually found quick frozen mamoths with buttercup flowers in their mouths.
While building the Alcan Highway to Alaska, construction workers found flash-frozen mammoths buried standing up with green food still in their stomachs. Recently I have had this verified first hand by oil workers digging on the North Slope who had dug up similar finds. Several native Alaskans from northern Alaska told me personally of finding musk ox, bison and mammoths found flash-frozen standing up and looking up in the sky with green food still in their mouths. Another well-documented story in books about the building of the Alcan Highway to Alaska tells about road crews discovering frozen meat buried in permafrost for thousands of years. The camp cook served up some of the 12,000-year-old quick-frozen, mammoth meat.
After the Moon hit the earth was suddenly plunged into darkness lasting several hundred years while dirty snow began a new mini ice age that lasted two-thousand years. A meteorite (possibly ice from the Moon) fell into the south Atlantic about the same time threw whales up into the mountains of New York State and the Carolina s I believe this event happened about the same time as when the mastodons and other animals were quick-frozen in northern Canada and Alaska.
This is planetary forensics. Where did the bullet go? There was an old mystery book where a person was murdered and they couldn't prosecute the killer because they couldn't find the bullet. It turned out that the bullet was made of ice and had simply melted. In this case the bullet could have been frozen methane.
When the moon hit earth with a force of 650-tera-mega-tons it compressed the Arctic Ocean flattening the crust of the earth at the pole to a depth of 5 kilometers. The sea floor bounced back up to 3 kilometers and filled in with sediment to an average depth of 1.3 kilometers. Hydrographic maps of the Arctic Ocean confirm these depths with the deepest measured at 5 kilometers. The impact knocked earth's rotational pole 23.5 degrees from the middle of the continent of Greenland to its present position in relation to the sun giving earth summer and winter seasons. Before the moon hit the earth there were only small seasons due to Earths elliptical orbit around the sun.
MOON RESPONSIBLE FOR EQUATORIAL BULGE
The moon's collision at the pole may have created the earth's equatorial bulge. Impact craters are usually ten times the diameter of the meteor but when you slow an object down it doesn't hold true. When you have two atmospheres acting as buffers plus (by Brad's shallow, moon-meteor-crater calculations) 253 kilometers of ice to cushion the blow it would have depressed the crust of the earth to a depth of 5.3 kilometers. Our moon would have had to come in at a low angel and bounced off at the 27,000 miles-hour, escape velocity (possibly much less due to its large mass) in order to go in orbit around earth.
The minimum distance it would have to bounce out into space to still remain in orbit would be the geosynchronous orbit point of 28,000 miles. This is the point above the earth where a satellite will remain over one place on earth because its orbit speed matching the rotational speed of the earth. Remaining in the geosynchronous orbit wouldn't help keep earth warm nor would it create tides to oxygenate the oceans so its impact speed had to have exceeded escape velocity.
After the impact there would have been helices tides thousands of feet high as the moon made several highly elliptical orbits around earth. It eventually settled into its present orbit with one side facing earth. Noah would have had one heck of a wild ride...
Where it impacted the North Slope it drove tons of methane ice underground and chemically altered the existing oil strata and squeezed it into pockets. The water brought in was enough to raise sea levels more than 300 feet. I say this because archeologists looking for human habitation that existed before 13,000 years ago are finding ancient beaches and artifacts at that level. Most of the earth was made uninhabitable for three thousand years. It would have been a rough time for any life to exist on earth because the volcanism and resultant atmospheric dust pumped into the stratosphere would have blotted out the sun for a long time.
I call on my readers to find the fingerprint on the moon. There should be a negative replica of the undersea ridges of the Arctic Ocean imprinted on the moon someplace. Take a polar projection relief map of the ocean bottom, make a negative of it and make it the same scale as your map of the moon and compare the fingerprint. The deepest part of the Arctic Ocean is the Canadian Basin just north of the Brooks Range. Going northwest it shallows up considerably to what they call the Northwind Escarpment and the Chukchi Plateau. Another 500 miles north is the Mendeleyev Plain and the Mendeleyev Ridge then the Pole Plain. Heading South toward Russia is the Lomosov Ridge. Brad Guth recently found a large crater on the bottom of the moon that fits the profile.
How much DNA did the moon drop off on earth? Given the volume of ice and water there is a very good chance that it dropped off quite a bit. Life coming in from space was first envisioned by the theory of Transthermia where scientists theorize that many forms of life including the common cold viruses are brought in from space.
In 2001 a meteorite exploded above India depositing an estimated 50 tons of material on earth. It rained red material over a small area which appeared to be growing. Scientists gathered up quite a bit of this material and put it in culture mediums. It grew and appeared to be alive but it has no DNA. They still have the material. Could it be some kind of chemical life form?
How many whales and porpoise and carp did the moon drop off? There could have been a whole plethora of DNA seeded to earth at this time. How many sturgeon, trout, cod and northern pike were released into our ecosystem?
Currently there is enough water on earth to cover the surface to an average depth of 8000 feet-that is if the earth were perfect sphere. Some of the water on our planet could have come from our moon during that collision.
If there was 163 kilometers of ice on our moon before it collided with earth it would have brought in 1/4 of our water. It would be Kevin Costner's Water World © for sure. I think a good portion of the ice was frozen methane. If we knew the water-ice methane ratio on Europa then we might get a better handle on the math.
One side of the Moon is all beat to Hell with meteorites while the side facing us is relatively smooth. The giant maria have very few meteor creators. What protected them from meteor impacts? Were they covered with ice sheets 13,000 years ago. Why is their color so dark? Is it possible that the darkness is salt residu? What causes the thousand-mile-long rills?
The area of a sphere is 4pi radius squared. The radius of earth is 3962 miles to its area works out to 197-million square miles. The Moon's radius is 1080 miles and its surface area is 14, 657, 724 square miles. The earth has 13.457 times more surface area than the moon. If you took the 88-mile thick ice on the moon and spread it over the earth it would cover the earth with a 6.5-mile-thick coating of ice. The moon could very well have brought half the water into earth and then some but a good portion of the ice was frozen methane. After it hit about 10 percent of the methane was trapped underground on earth. This then would agree with what we are seeing on earth today. Some of the water may have been lost into space when the moon came in and more when it departed. Some of the methane and water is still stored in vast underground oceans here on earth and some was created by the meteor impact.
According to the managers of the major, oil companies here in Alaska there is 37 trillion cubic feet of gas on the North Slope and another 14 trillion cubic feet yet to be discovered. Most oil fields are ancient meteor impact zones. It takes a little more oomph to united the hydrogen in deep underground water reserviors with the carbon to make hydrocarbons. However some oil is created when limestone plates are being subducted along the ring of fire. The oil perculates up into pools near the surface like in the Los Angeles Basin.
Our moon theory opens up a new Pandora's Box of questions such as: "When did this happen?" and "Was this the event that occurred 12,718 years ago that instantly froze wooly mammoths in the standing position with green food still in their mouths?" When I mentioned this theory to Brad he got so excited that you could hear the enthusiasm in his voice over the phone. He instantly started measuring the radius of the Brooks Range to compute the size of the object to see if it would compare with our moon. The reason there are no moons around the inner planets is because friction from the solar wind slows them down to where they impact their planets or go off into the sun.
Apparently there are many kinds of icy moons out there. Europa is slightly smaller than our moon with a layer of ice 100 kilometers thick. Sedna, a newly-discovered planet in our Kuppier belt beyond Pluto, has a density of two grams per cubic centimeter. It is also slightly smaller than our moon and is red in color due to iron oxides. It is believed to be covered with a layer of ice. It can be detected by amateur astronomers with good backyard telescopes because its precise location is known.
We used an interactive, impact calculator to calculate the force of meteorite impacts. www.Arizona.edu/impacteffects
You simply put in the size of the earth 5.98 E 24 the mass of the moon 8.5E 22 along with the angel of 11 degrees and a velocity of 2 kilometers per second which is the minimum we figured to get the moon back into orbit.. FYI: all these figures including the mass of the Sun, Moon and stars are available by Google search. Please look these things up yoursel and do the math to see if we are correct.
With an incoming velocity of 2 kilometers per second, which is slightly more than the moons current speed coming in at a ten degree angel it would release a force of 600 to 650 terra megatons of energy. The size of the crater would be 1170 miles in diameter or about 1800 kilometers. The depth of the crater would be 5 kilometers and bounce back up to 2.86 kilometers. The average depth of the Arctic Ocean is 1.3 kilometers however it is considerably deeper north of Prudo Bay-up to five kilometers. Additionally it is about 1800 kilometers across!
The above figures are based on the moon being solid rock and not methane and water. The web site has formulas for water impacts but it takes some rearranging of the internal navigation. The figures are also based on today's atmosphere being 14.5 pounds per square inch instead of a more realistic 25 pounds per square inch. Such conditions would slow the incoming moon down considerably. Normally, meteorites within our solar system come in at velocities between fifty thousand to one hundred thousand miles per hour. The moon's current orbital speed is 19,051 miles per hour. Given an original velocity of 70,000 miles per hour and mitigating circumstances of a thick layer of ice, a thicker layer of atmosphere and the amount of salt in the seas, plus a salty lunar atmosphere our lunar impact theory appears to be a strong possibility.
Brad Guth thinks my figures are off and is insistent that the moon came in at a lower entry angle with a speed of only two kilometers per second. He says it lost very little of its initial speed after the impact due to its large mass and the fact that large masses are harder to slow down. It's the "Q-ball effect." Brad's moon figures would have caused less devastation to earth's ecosystem and I have to admit he could be right.
Tiauanaco was at sea level was pushed up 13,000 feet and the earthquake resistant stone strucures held together with bronze pins was left in ruins.
People were living at the advanced city complex or Tiawanaku (Tiahuanaco, Tihunacu) and Puma Punku 15,000 years ago. This was one giant city complex at one time but was put up to the 13,000 foot level by some giant cataclysm. I now believe it was the Moon impacting the Earth that depressed the Earth's crust at the North Pole 5-kilometers that raised up the entire Continent of Antarctica several thousand feet along with parts of South America.
We can't cut such perfect stone blocks used in the construction and made of diorite, a substance as hard as granite. Perfectly strait saw cuts 1/8-inch wide and small holes were drilled through this very hard stone... Obviously they were more advanced than we are today. Dr. Robert M. Shoch places the time of this sudden rise in elevation at 9600 BCE. This agrees with Antarctic ice core data analyzed by two Norwegians as to when Earth came out of the last Ice Age and it also agrees with my estimation of when the Moon was brought into orbit around Earth 12.718 years ago. So we are off by 118 years. The calendars are probably off by that much.
If we had access to information about how long ice will last in the vacuum of space we might be able to tie up a few of the loose ends but there is absolutely no data available. You would think that since water and ice means everything to humanity they would do something about getting data on this subject but no! NASA has no information about ice in space. No experiments were ever done and no experiments are planned. No funding, no research, no nothing. Wouldn't it be interesting to see what would happen to an ice cube on the moon? It's a good thing they didn't do the ice cube experiment because it would probably explode killing one of the astronauts. An ice cube put in a near total vacuum and subjected to extreme radiation would instantly turn to steam. Never once has anyone put an ice cube in space so we are completely in the dark. We need to know how long a cubic meter of ice will last in space. All the science about icy moons and comets is meaningless because all they can do is guess and they are putting the guesses in NASA's Koran as absolute.
After the collision the moon would have had enough speed left over to go back into orbit (escape velocity is 11.2 kilometers per second). Currently the moon is receding from earth a little over one inch per year and traveling at a speed of 980 kilometers per second or 19,051.2 miles per hour around the earth-that is if the earth were not rotating. Because the earth is rotating slightly slower than the moon's orbital speed the moon appears to travel from east to west.
NOTE THE BEARDED ANUNNAKI GUYS ARE TEXTING WITH THEIR I PHONES WHILE THE DUMB HUMAN IS WORSHIPING THEM... THEY DIDN'T HAVE LAWS BACK THEN LIKE: NO TEXTING WHILE FLYING!... ONE CYLINDER IS BROKEN. They need Bazaliel to fix it. I believe the three cylinder engine was needed to keep it inflated. It may have run on hydrogen. The hydrogen could have been produced with electrolisis using windmills.
INSIDE A FLYING SAUCER: DOES IT LOOK FAMILIAR?
The evidence is clear that we are being terra-formed.... Most scientists will now tell you Earth had experienced at least six major extinctions. Life had to have been reseeded after each one. Evolution did not produce the incredible diversity of life we have on Earth today. Evolution takes a very long time and does not produce impractical or improbable creatures that serve no real purpose. Earth had to have been reseeded. The present ongoing Alien DNA harvest is probably necessary to reseed the Earth after the next big one.
A higher intelligence would not want to cause and extinction do to the risk of demolishing the planet; and they would be limited to the amount and type of ammunition (moons) on hand. Is it coincidence that the moon's diameter as seen from earth exactly matches the diameter of the sun during an eclipse? Is it coincidence that the moon always shows one side toward earth? If the moon had hit near earth's equator would it have stopped earth's rotation? Is all this further evidence of terra-forming?
The amount of ice on the Moon raised sea levels 300 feet?
This may be about the most astonishing thing you ever heard - A CITY 6,000 FEET UNDER THE SEA! But if you'll be patient with me, there's something else you may be interested in first...
The Swedish research ship "Albatross" had just returned from a peaceful reconnaissance in the South Atlantic.
Had you peeped through a lattice window in a little house outside Stockholm, you might have seen two men, one of them bearded, huddled across a table, engaged in lively talk.
One of them, in fact, looked almost wild-eyed. But, knowing him as a well-balanced, sober man, you would have to admit that whatever it was that now had him so excited must be something extraordinary.
"I swear to you, it's incredible! Do you know, we were sounding the seabed 700 miles east of Brazil. And we brought up core samples of fresh-water plants! Can you believe that! And do you know how deep they were? Three thousand meters!"
The speaker was Professor Hans Pettersson, who had led the expedition.
And he added: "These samples actually contained micro- organisms, twigs, plants and even tree bark."
Within a similar time frame, discussion was hot in London. Coral had been recovered from depths of over 3,000 feet (1,000 meters) in mid-Atlantic Ocean sites. Now we all know that coral grows only close to sea level.
So in London, England, someone else was making a chilling diagnosis: "Either the seabed dropped thousands of feet or the sea rose mightily."
AND STILL ANOTHER
Meanwhile, at Columbia University in the U.S.A., Professor Maurice Ewing, a prominent marine geologist, was reporting on an expedition that had descended to submerged plateaus at a depth of 5,000 feet.
"It's quite amazing," he said. "At 5,000 feet down, they discovered prehistoric beach sand. It was brought up in one case from a depth of nearly three and one half miles, far from any place where beaches exist today.
"One deposit was 1,200 miles from the nearest land."
As we all know, sandy beaches form from waves breaking on the edge of the coastal rim of the seas. Beach sand does not form deep down on the ocean bottom.
Then Ewing dropped his bombshell: "Either the land must have sunk 2 or 3 miles or the sea must have been 2 or 3 miles lower than now. Either conclusion is startling."
WHAT THIS MEANS
These facts mean one of two things: either there was a mighty ocean bed subsidence (unexplainable by orthodox science), or a huge (likewise unexplained) addition of water to the ocean.
Note above how the time between Ice Ages decreases as you go back in time. This is an indication that our sun is in orbit around something that imparts additional light and heat. Note also how the Ice Ages are smaller and less severe 700-hundred thousand years back in time.
Note also that these are Antarctic Ice core samples and Antarctica is much colder than the rest of the world so the temperature does not reflect the actual average global temperatures. For the most part, Antarctica has had ice caps for a very long time.
Let's briefly consider these.
1. Sudden subsidence: Much of the landscape that is now drowned by the ocean still has sharp, fine profiles. But these sharp, fine profiles would have been eroded, and the lava covering the ocean floor would have decayed if all this rocky terrain had been immersed in sea water for more than 15,000 years.
You see, chemical and mechanical forces are very destructive. Sharp edges and points can be ground down and blunted by abrasion, erosion, and the action of waves.
But the entire seabed below the present surf zone has retained its sharpness of profile. Had the subsidence taken place gradually, chemical and other forces would have ground down this sharp profile within a few hundred years.
If the land had sunk slowly, even the surf would have worn away these profiles. No, it was a rapid subsidence, if a subsidence it was.
This sudden collapse of an area covering many millions of square miles does not support a gradual sinking, but rather a cataclysmic event.
Such subsidence is perfectly in keeping with the centuries-long adjustments that occurred after the Great Flood trauma.
2. Pre-Flood sea level lower however, some of the data strongly suggest that the sea level actually was several thousand feet lower than at present - that there was LESS WATER in the ocean at one time. These discoveries suggest that we are uncovering evidence of a former sea level!
But this would call for a relatively sudden increase of 30 percent in the volume of the ocean. The compelling question is, WHERE DID THIS WATER COME FROM? Few geologists can bring themselves to answer this.
Note above that the temperature was much higher in the Vostock Region of Antarctica millions of years ago. Antarctica was still very cold compared to the rest of the globe but average global temperatures were actually over 60 F until about three million years. Suddenly after the Banard's Loop explosion in Orion the average global temperatures suddenly dropped down to around 32 degree F. or zero C and stayed there.
Obviously, melting ice sheets could never have contained enough water to raise the ocean level thousands of feet. So we can forget melting ice sheets being the cause. Could it have come from the Moon?
CITY ON THE SEABED?
Now for another surprise. This time the excitement was in the Pacific. The year was 1965. A research vessel named "Anton Brunn" was investigating the Nazca Trench, off Peru.
The sonar operator called for the captain.
"I don't know what to make of this," he murmured. "Around here, the ocean floor is all mud bottom. But just take in these sonar recordings... unusual shapes on the ocean floor! I'm puzzled."
"Better lower a camera," came the order.
At a depth of 6,000 feet a photograph revealed huge upright pillars and walls, some of which seemed to have writing on them. In other nearby locations, apparently artificially shaped stones lay on their sides, as though they had toppled over.
The crew rubbed their eyes and kept staring. Could this really be? ...the remains of a city under a mass of water more than a mile deep!
Was it overwhelmed suddenly by some gigantic disaster? And now it was buried under 6,000 feet of ocean.
Another explanation for a city being 6000 feet below the sea: When the Moon was brought in hitting the Arctic Ocean the earth being a liquid ball the impact forced some land masses up while others were submerged. Antarctica, for example has an average height above sea level of 7,500 feet. I don't think it was always that highbecause the ancients mapped the sea coast very accurately. Its average elevation is now over a mile high. That is why is has such a massive ice cap. Antarctica being on the exact opposite side of the Moon impact was pushed up. People were living at Teajunaco which was at sea level. There are boat moorings 13,000 feet above sea level. Lake Titikaka was once part of the atlantic Ocean. There are old sea shells buried in the mud. I know this is all hard to accept but one has to look at the facts.
Interstellar travel requires massive radiation shielding (not to mention dust and meteor shielding) and it stands to reason that they came here inside a hollow moon or were shielded from cosmic rays and meteorites by a moon. It can't be done any other way by our known science. If it was brought here at on a long journey throught space with a speed of say, 100 kilometers per second aft side would collect methane ice with the side facing the direction of travel the front would take a lot of hits. It would have a tremendous amount of craters much like the back side of the moon today. Negative mascons or large caves on the back of the moon would explain why it orbits with one side always facing toward earth.
All the resources on mars have been stripped. It's as if the populations that lived there took everything and left.
NOTE THAT MARS HAS A THICKER ATMOSPHERE THAN NASA WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE. IT HAS CLOUDS AND STORMS.