I WAS BRAINWASHED BY THE POLICE STATE LIKE EVERYONE ELSE...

Tinny Ray news.journalism@gmail.com via googlegroups.com	Mar 24 (1 day ago)
to libertarianism, rexy

Rex Curry, the historian referenced in your post, is a national treasure! It reminds me of this quote: "Remove the pledge from the flag; remove the flag from schools; remove schools from government." http://rexcurry.net Dr. Curry is the historian who showed that the American socialist Francis Bellamy's Pledge of Allegiance to the US flag was the origin of the Nazi salute and Nazi behavior (e.g. robotic chanting to flags) under Hitler's German socialism. German socialists used the Nazi flag's symbol to represent crossed "S" letters for their socialism (that is another one of Dr. Curry's jaw-dropping discoveries).

  Good to hear that Dr. Curry is cited above. Thanks for    the post and good luck Pointer Institute for Media          Studies!

      On Monday, December 26, 2005 at 3:34:53 PM UTC-5,         Pointer Institute for Media Studies wrote:

More people are joining http://rexcurry.net/pledge-lawyer.html and taking
the "pledge not to pledge" (allegiance to the flag).  It is unfortunate that
modern flag Nazis still persecute people about the pledge in the USA's
growing police state.
http://rexcurry.net/pledge-of-allegiance-flag-nazis.htmlNews reports from December 23, 2005 state that Cameron Frazier refused to
stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance at Boynton Beach High School and
it sparked a Constitutional battle against his teacher and the Palm Beach
County School Board. The 17-year-old junior claims in a federal lawsuit that
he was ridiculed and punished Dec. 8 when he twice refused to stand for the
pledge during his fourth-period algebra class.
News reports from March 1, 2005 stated that an incident occurred in Brick
Township, New Jersey. A video of the shocking behavior is at
http://rexcurry.net/pledge-of-allegiance-mantel.wmv  Similar to some other
states, NJ has a morning paramilitary drill that includes chanting the
Pledge of Allegiance and the "National Anthem."  A videotape was made by a
student in the class of Stuart Mantel. The class started out that morning
with Mantel yelling "I don't want to hear a sound! Not a sound! Morning
exercises will come on, you will stand, you will stand quietly, you will pay
attention! Any Questions!? ... Now stand up and keep your mouths shut!"
Students stood up as the national anthem began playing.  In the middle of
the "The Star-Spangled Banner," Mantel walked over to Jay and demanded that
he stand up. Jay silently refused, and Mantel yelled again, "Stand up!" Jay
then said "I don't have to stand up." To which Mantel insisted "You have to
stand." Jay said, "No I don't." Mantel then reached over and pulled Jay's
chair out from under him. Jay responded to Stuart Mantel's outrageous
behavior by asking Mantel "Are you serious?", to which Mantel yelled "I am
damn well serious." Superintendent Thomas L. Seidenberger  held office at
the time.
stop the pledge of allegiance and what it causes
The Pledge has a long history of persecution and violence.  Francis Bellamy
(the Pledge's author) supported a government takeover of education.  The
government's schools imposed segregation by law and taught racism as
official policy.  The USA's behavior was an example for three decades before the Nazis. 

As under Nazism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, and blacks and the Jewish and others in the USA attended government schools that dictated segregation, taught racism, and persecuted children who refused to perform the straight-arm salute and robotically chant the Pledge. 

There were acts of student violence, teacher violence, police violence and mob violence. There were arrests and prosecutions. Children were taken away from their parents on the government's claim of unfit parenting if the children were not forced to pledge. Some kids were expelled from government schools and had to use the many better alternatives. The government schools then persecuted those non-government schools.

 The Pledge routines are part of the USA's growing police-state.  The insane government in the U.S. could cause comatose persons to Pledge dis-allegiance, desecrate the flag, and recite a declaration of independence. Remove the Pledge from the flag, remove flags from schools, remove schools from government. 

Fight the flag hags and their flag fetish. Government's schools should not teach kids to verbally fellate flags each morning. It is like a brainwashed cult of the omnipotent state. For adults it is childish. Remove the Pledge from the flag, remove flags from schools, remove schools from government. Shocking facts were exposed by the historian Rex Curry about the Pledge's putrid past. As a libertarian lawyer, Curry provides pro bono services at schools and events nationwide to educate the public about the news.
1. Dr. Rex Curry showed that the USA's first Pledge of Allegiance used a straight-arm salute and it was the origin of the salute of the monstrous National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis). Professor Curry helped to establish that it was not an ancient Roman salute, and that the "ancient Roman salute" is a myth. http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html
2. The Pledge began with a military salute that then stretched out toward the flag. Historic photographs are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html and
at http://rexcurry.net/pledge_military.html   Due to the way that both gestures were used, the military salute led to the Nazi salute. The Nazi salute is an extended military salute.
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html
3. Francis Bellamy (author of the "Pledge of Allegiance") and Edward Bellamy (author of the novel "Looking Backward") and Charles Bellamy (author of "A Moment of Madness") were socialists.  Edward and Charles were brothers, and Francis was their cousin. Francis and Edward were both self-proclaimed National Socialists and they supported the Nationalism" movement in the USA, the "Nationalist" magazine, the "Nationalist Educational Association," and their dogma of "military socialism," and Edward inspired he "Nationalist Party" (in the USA) and their dogma influenced socialists in Germany, and the Pledge was the origin of the Nazi salute. "Nazi" means "National Socialist German Workers' Party." 

A mnemonic device is the swastika. Although the swastika was an ancient symbol, Professor Curry discovered that it was also used sometimes by German National Socialists to represent "S" letters for their "socialism." Curry changed the way that people view the symbol of the horrid National Socialist German Workers' Party.  Hitler altered his own signature to use the same stylized "S" letter for "socialist" and similar alphabetic symbolism still shows on Volkswagens.
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-swastika.html
Dr. Curry showed that many modern myths about swastikas are based on the false belief that Nazis called their symbol a "swastika."  German National
Socialists did not use the word "swastika," but called their symbol a "Hakenkreuz."  Professor Curry showed that many modern myths rely on a false
belief that Nazis called themselves "Nazis" or used some other term (Party members referred to themselves as "National Socialists" and did not use the term "Nazis").

Hooray for Putin!!

Why can’t our leaders say this? by David Robinson

Subject: Message from Vladimir Putin to Muslims.
No wonder he was selected by Forbes as the most powerful person in the world.
This is one time our elected leaders should pay attention to the advice of Vladimir Putin.
I would suggest that not only our leaders but every citizen of USA should pay attention to this advice. How scary is that?
It is a sad day when a Communist Leader makes more sense than
our LEADERS here in the U.S.A. but here it is!
Vladimir Putin's speech - SHORTEST SPEECH EVER.
On August 04, 2013, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed the Duma, (Russian Parliament), and gave a speech about the tensions with minorities in Russia:
"In Russia, live like Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, it should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws. If they prefer Sharia Law, and live the life of Muslim's then we advise them to go to those places where that's the state law.
"Russia does not need Muslim minorities. Minorities need Russia, and we will not grant them special privileges, or try to change our laws to fit their desires, no matter how loud they yell 'discrimination'. We will not tolerate disrespect of our Russian culture. We better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation. The Muslims are taking over those countries and they will not take over Russia. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with the lack of culture or the primitive ways of Sharia Law and Muslims.
"When this honorable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have in mind the Russian national interest first, observing that the Muslims Minorities Are Not Russians."
The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a five minute standing ovation.

 

David Robinson | March 19, 2015 at 10:19 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL:http://wp.me/p3Zawk-Ry

GOVERNMENT CENSORS PROTESTS ON YOUTUBE

Consciousness TV | Government Orders YouTube To Censor Protest Videos

• 4 Comments

i

1 Vote

In a frightening example of how the state is tightening its grip around the free Internet, it has emerged that You Tube is complying with thousands of requests from governments to censor and remove videos that show protests and other examples of citizens simply asserting their rights, while also deleting search terms by government mandate.

The latest example is You Tube’s compliance with a request from the British government to censor footage of the British Constitution Group Lawful Rebellion protest, during which they attempted to civilly arrest Judge Michael Peake at Birkenhead county court.

Peake was ruling on a case involving Roger Hayes, former member of UKIP, who has refused to pay council tax, both as a protest against the government’s treasonous activities in sacrificing Britain to globalist interests and as a result of Hayes clearly proving that council tax is illegal.

Hayes has embarked on an effort to legally prove that the enforced collection of council tax by government is unlawful because no contract has been agreed between the individual and the state. His argument is based on the sound legal principle that just like the council, Hayes can represent himself as a third party in court and that “Roger Hayes” is a corporation and must be treated as one in the eyes of the law.

The British government doesn’t want this kind of information going viral in the public domain because it is scared stiff of a repeat of the infamous poll tax riots of 1990, a massive tax revolt in the UK that forced the Thatcher government to scrap the poll tax altogether because of mass civil disobedience and refusal to pay.

When viewers in the UK attempt to watch videos of the protest, they are met with the message, “This content is not available in your country due to a government removal request.”

We then click through to learn that, “YouTube occasionally receives requests from governments around the world to remove content from our site, and as a result, YouTube may block specific content in order to comply with local laws in certain countries.”

You can also search by country to discover that Google, the owner of You Tube, has complied with the majority of requests from governments, particularly in the United States and the UK, not only to remove You Tube videos, but also specific web search terms and thousands of “data requests,” meaning demands for information that would reveal the true identity of a You Tube user. Google claims that the information sent to governments is “needed for legitimate criminal investigations,” but whether these “data requests” have been backed up by warrants is not divulged by the company.

“Between July 1 and Dec. 31 (2009), Google received 3,580 requests for user data from U.S. government agencies, slightly less than the 3,663 originating from Brazil,” reports PC World. “The United Kingdom and India sent more than 1,000 requests each, and smaller numbers originated from various other countries.”

With regard to search terms, one struggles to understand how a specific combination of words in a Google search can be considered a violation of any law. This is about government and Google working hand in hand to manipulate search results in order to censor inconvenient information, something which Google now freely admits to doing.

You Tube’s behavior is more despicable than the Communist Chinese, who are at least open about their censorship policies, whereas You Tube hides behind a blanket excuse and doesn’t even say what law has been broken.

Anyone who swallows the explanation that the videos were censored in this case because the government was justifiably enforcing a law that says scenes from inside a court room cannot be filmed is beyond naive. Court was not even in session in the protest footage that was removed, and the judge had already left the courtroom.

The real reason for the removal is the fact that the British government is obviously petrified of seeing a group of focused and educated citizens, black, white, old and young, male and female, go head to head with the corrupt system on its own stomping ground.

In their efforts to keep a lid on the growing populist fury that has arrived in response to rampant and growing financial and political tyranny in every sector of society, governments in the west are now mimicking Communist Chinese-style Internet censorship policies in a bid to neutralize protest movements, while hypocritically lecturing the rest of the world on maintaining web freedom.

Via a combination of cybersecurity legislation and policy that is hastily introduced with no real oversight, governments and large Internet corporations are crafting an environment where the state can simply demand information be removed on a whim with total disregard for freedom of speech protections.

This was underscored last year at the height of the Wikileaks issue, when Amazon axed Wikileaks from its servers following a phone call made by Senator Joe Lieberman’s Senate Homeland Security Committee demanding the website be deleted.

Lieberman has been at the forefront of a push to purge the Internet of all dissent by empowering Obama with a figurative Internet kill switch that he would use to shut down parts of the Internet or terminate websites under the guise of national security. Lieberman spilled the beans on the true reason for the move during a CNN interview when he stated “Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too.”

Except that China doesn’t disconnect the Internet “in case of war,” it only ever does so to censor and intimidate people who express dissent against government atrocities or corruption, as we have documented. This is precisely the kind of online environment the British and American governments are trying to replicate as they attempt to put a stranglehold on the last bastion of true free speech – the world wide web.