I find it very difficult to explain the concepts in my book. I am hoping that this will clear the air...
The Moon is owned by the Anunnaki and is Nibiru.
The Anunnaki own the Moon and it is Nibiru
NOMOON UNTIL 12,713 YEARS AGO
Giordano Bruno (a 16th century Italian philosopher) is reputed to have written in De Immenso: (Bk IV, x, pp. 56-57): “There are those who have believed that there was a certain time (as our Mythologian says) when the moon, which was believed to be younger than the sun, was not yet created. The Arcadians, who dwelt not far from the Po, are believed to have been in existence before it (the moon).” “Theodorus writes in his first book that the moon had appeared a little while before the war which was fought by Hercules against the giants. Aristochius and Dionysius Chalcidensis, in the first of their works, confirm the same.” “Mnaseas said that the Arcadians were born before the moon, and so they were called ‘proselenian’; meaning, ‘before the moon’.” [1]
Bruno goes on to step upon the sensibilities of future scholars by noting that, “the earth, which is of the same species as the moon, is of creatable and destructible substance, and is truly animal and even mortal, although divine. Therefore, the planets (worlds) are able to be created and destroyed, and it is not possible that they have been eternal, since we have proved them to be alterable and consisting of changing parts.” [1] [emphasis added]
Velikovskyhas discussed this same idea by noting that one of the most remote recollections of mankind is in regard to the period of Earth’s history when it was Moonless. Velikovsky quotes everyone from Democritus and Anaxagoras to Aristotle and Apollonius of Rhodes to show that such a pre-Hellenic time existed. Those humans living at the time were called Pelasgians, Proselenes (“before the Moon”), and Arcadians (pre-Danai and pre-Deukalion). They were said to have dwelt in the mountains, fed on acorns, and lived as aborigines. [See below.]
Plutarch, Hippolytus, Censorinus, and a doubting Lucian wrote of pre-Lunar people, as did Ovid, who said that the Arcadians possessed their land before the birth of Jove, and were older than the Moon. There are even Biblical references (Job 25:5 and Psalm 72:5) which allude to a Moonless Earth -- or at least can be so interpreted. Finally, the memory of a Moonless Earth is contained in the oral traditions of such Indians as those of the Bogota highlands in the eastern Cordilleras of Columbia, i.e. according to tribesmen of Chibchas, “In the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens.”
The references to the aboriginal nature of the pre-Moon folk, and the fact they lived before “the birth of Jove” is particularly noteworthy. While Velikovsky and those scholars suggesting a Moonless Earth time, have never made the apparent connection to Sumerian records and the Anunnaki, many of whom of the latter have a date of birth (or arrival in the environs of Earth) which would have occurred after the time of some of Earth’s original aborigines. In fact, the time of a Moonless Earth might likely correspond to the time when Homo Erectus was roaming about the planet, dwelling in mountains, eating acorns, and becoming the archetype for future aborigines. The possible assumption that the Arcadians were a civilization is without confirming evidence. In addition, the habit of Sumerians to consider civilization and the world as an interchangeable term, does not eliminate an Arcadian “civilization” as being essentially an aboriginal one. Meanwhile, all the histories tie together, all the pieces of the puzzle fit -- provided, of course, there is no recarving of the puzzles to make them fit in an incorrect position.
Given the distinct possibility of the Moon being a relative newcomer to its orbit around the Earth, an arrival apparently prior to the Anunnaki of Sumerian history, one might even consider seriously the even more radical suggestion of the Moon being artificial. In the section on Lunatics, we considered this possibility of a Moon being the ideal space ship, wherein one has all the comforts of home (including a vast collection of kitchen sinks), and at the same time, can enjoy an observational status wherein no one else (in particular, arrogant humans) even suspects the existence of a nearby extraterrestrial intelligence.
Is it possible that the Moon arrived with the Anunnaki -- either initially, or later when it was apparent that an off-planet base was essential? Is this their “home away from home”, from which they could observe the going ons down below, while still enjoying a privacy from prying human eyes? Zecharia Sitchin [2] and others have noted that there were Anunnaki “watchers” in the space surrounding the Earth -- and while it might be assumed they were in artificial satellites in near-Earth orbit, no one appears [until the writing of this essay] to have considered that the artificial satellite upon which the Anunnaki were doing their watching (and administering the trans-shipments of Gold back to Nibiru) was in fact the Moon! And yet it makes total sense.
Adam and Eve being Lunatics is one case in point, where perhaps the genetic work of Enki and Ninki was being conducted in an off-Earth-site location. The fact that Adam may have been preaching a worship of the Moon is just more evidence of his possible birthplace, and the location of his acknowledged creators.
Richard Hoaglandhas suggested that the distinct differences between the near and far sides of the Moon may be the result of interplanetary (or interstellar) war damages -- one side being blasted into “seas”, while the far side has no such, similar “damage”! There is also the War of the Titans, and all sorts of warfare going on among the Anunnaki, especially Enki and Enlil, in the earlier times.
The reason the near side of the Moon is relatively smooth with few new craters is due to the fact that it was covered with over 200 kilometers of ice accumulated during its long space long voyage to Earth. When it was bounced off Earth the ice was knocked off raising sea levels on Earth 300 feet 11,713 years ago taking Earth out of the Ice Age.
It might appear ancient history has not even begun to scratch the surface of possibilities of Anunnaki residing on the Moon in the early days (as well as now?), in a continuing series of “Prime Directive” Violations. It is even possible that Hoagland’s lunar anomalies are the remnants of that Anunnaki war, and that there is still Anunnaki in residence on “our” Moon. Suddenly, the “Man in the Moon” takes on a greater credibility.
Furthermore, an Anunnaki controlled artificial Moon might have allowed them to use it in some fashion to cause the E.DIN conditions of a “perpetual dawn” on planet Earth. The Moon could even be where Enoch (Thoth) might have gone for his schooling at Anunnaki University. [One wonders what the prerequisites are, or if the admission requirements are really tough. A rampant curiosity might be important.]
When the Anunnaki discovered Earth 12,000 years ago it had already lost 98% of its atmosphere down from a high of 750 PSI down to 14 PSI. Earth was in an Ice Age with huge ice caps on both poles and it had little arable land. The oceans were not very productive because the sun beat down on the Equator all the time. It was cold because most of the sunlight was reflected off the Ice Caps back into space. The only way to revive Earth and replenish the atmosphere for larger populations of humans and animals was to tilt it 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun’s rays and increased volcanism with the Moon’s gravity. This released more CO2 into the atmosphere. Obviously they had done this before.
Bringing the Moon in by bouncing it off the Arctic Ocean tilted the Earth 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun's rays which doubled arable land and doubled the plankton growth in the oceans to replenish the oxygen. The book is: Cosmological Ice Ages.
My co-author and I used an online impact computer, Arizona.edu/impact effects. We put the mass of the Moon in there, 8.35 E 22 kilograms (this number included the 200-kilometer-thick coating of ice), the mass of the Earth 5.98 E 24 kilograms, an angel of 11 degrees and a speed of 2.5 kilometers per second. The resulting numbers that came back was that the Moon would depress Earth’s crust five kilometers. The Arctic Ocean is five kilometers deep above Alaska. The force of impact was 700 terra-megatons. It killed off all the tribes, horses, camels and mastodons in North America at a time when there were few humans living there. Mastodons were found with quick frozen with green food in their mouths caused by winds of 200+ miles per hour and temperatures of -200 degrees Fahrenheit caused by the vacuum of space behind the Moon.
There is only one object up there in space close to Earth with enough mass to tilt Earth 23.5 degrees and that object is the Moon. This had to be done to extend the life of the planet a few extra thousand years to enable humans to become conscious and become a type one civilization. (We are still a type zero.)
Finally, while the Anunnaki might have been the Gods and Goddesses of Sumerian and other ancient civilizations, it is also possible that the Anunnaki themselves might have had others to look up to and revere as superior beings. That may also be why they preferred the relative anonymity of having a natural looking space ship. Why not?----Especially after terra-forming Earth to suit their needs. To talk about this more call: (907) 283-1456 www.AlaskaPublishing.com and www.GuardDogBooks.com
NOMOON UNTIL 12,713 YEARS AGO
Giordano Bruno (a 16th century Italian philosopher) is reputed to have written in De Immenso: (Bk IV, x, pp. 56-57): “There are those who have believed that there was a certain time (as our Mythologian says) when the moon, which was believed to be younger than the sun, was not yet created. The Arcadians, who dwelt not far from the Po, are believed to have been in existence before it (the moon).” “Theodorus writes in his first book that the moon had appeared a little while before the war which was fought by Hercules against the giants. Aristochius and Dionysius Chalcidensis, in the first of their works, confirm the same.” “Mnaseas said that the Arcadians were born before the moon, and so they were called ‘proselenian’; meaning, ‘before the moon’.” [1]
Bruno goes on to step upon the sensibilities of future scholars by noting that, “the earth, which is of the same species as the moon, is of creatable and destructible substance, and is truly animal and even mortal, although divine. Therefore, the planets (worlds) are able to be created and destroyed, and it is not possible that they have been eternal, since we have proved them to be alterable and consisting of changing parts.” [1] [emphasis added]
Velikovsky
Plutarch, Hippolytus, Censorinus, and a doubting Lucian wrote of pre-Lunar people, as did Ovid, who said that the Arcadians possessed their land before the birth of Jove, and were older than the Moon. There are even Biblical references (Job 25:5 and Psalm 72:5) which allude to a Moonless Earth -- or at least can be so interpreted. Finally, the memory of a Moonless Earth is contained in the oral traditions of such Indians as those of the Bogota highlands in the eastern Cordilleras of Columbia, i.e. according to tribesmen of Chibchas, “In the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens.”
The references to the aboriginal nature of the pre-Moon folk, and the fact they lived before “the birth of Jove” is particularly noteworthy. While Velikovsky and those scholars suggesting a Moonless Earth time, have never made the apparent connection to Sumerian records and the Anunnaki, many of whom of the latter have a date of birth (or arrival in the environs of Earth) which would have occurred after the time of some of Earth’s original aborigines. In fact, the time of a Moonless Earth might likely correspond to the time when Homo Erectus was roaming about the planet, dwelling in mountains, eating acorns, and becoming the archetype for future aborigines. The possible assumption that the Arcadians were a civilization is without confirming evidence. In addition, the habit of Sumerians to consider civilization and the world as an interchangeable term, does not eliminate an Arcadian “civilization” as being essentially an aboriginal one. Meanwhile, all the histories tie together, all the pieces of the puzzle fit -- provided, of course, there is no recarving of the puzzles to make them fit in an incorrect position.
Given the distinct possibility of the Moon being a relative newcomer to its orbit around the Earth, an arrival apparently prior to the Anunnaki of Sumerian history, one might even consider seriously the even more radical suggestion of the Moon being artificial. In the section on Lunatics, we considered this possibility of a Moon being the ideal space ship, wherein one has all the comforts of home (including a vast collection of kitchen sinks), and at the same time, can enjoy an observational status wherein no one else (in particular, arrogant humans) even suspects the existence of a nearby extraterrestrial intelligence.
Is it possible that the Moon arrived with the Anunnaki -- either initially, or later when it was apparent that an off-planet base was essential? Is this their “home away from home”, from which they could observe the going ons down below, while still enjoying a privacy from prying human eyes? Zecharia Sitchin [2] and others have noted that there were Anunnaki “watchers” in the space surrounding the Earth -- and while it might be assumed they were in artificial satellites in near-Earth orbit, no one appears [until the writing of this essay] to have considered that the artificial satellite upon which the Anunnaki were doing their watching (and administering the trans-shipments of Gold back to Nibiru) was in fact the Moon! And yet it makes total sense.
Adam and Eve being Lunatics is one case in point, where perhaps the genetic work of Enki and Ninki was being conducted in an off-Earth-site location. The fact that Adam may have been preaching a worship of the Moon is just more evidence of his possible birthplace, and the location of his acknowledged creators.
Richard Hoagland
The reason the near side of the Moon is relatively smooth with few new craters is due to the fact that it was covered with over 200 kilometers of ice accumulated during its long space long voyage to Earth. When it was bounced off Earth the ice was knocked off raising sea levels on Earth 300 feet 11,713 years ago taking Earth out of the Ice Age.
It might appear ancient history has not even begun to scratch the surface of possibilities of Anunnaki residing on the Moon in the early days (as well as now?), in a continuing series of “Prime Directive” Violations. It is even possible that Hoagland’s lunar anomalies are the remnants of that Anunnaki war, and that there is still Anunnaki in residence on “our” Moon. Suddenly, the “Man in the Moon” takes on a greater credibility.
Furthermore, an Anunnaki controlled artificial Moon might have allowed them to use it in some fashion to cause the E.DIN conditions of a “perpetual dawn” on planet Earth. The Moon could even be where Enoch (Thoth) might have gone for his schooling at Anunnaki University. [One wonders what the prerequisites are, or if the admission requirements are really tough. A rampant curiosity might be important.]
When the Anunnaki discovered Earth 12,000 years ago it had already lost 98% of its atmosphere down from a high of 750 PSI down to 14 PSI. Earth was in an Ice Age with huge ice caps on both poles and it had little arable land. The oceans were not very productive because the sun beat down on the Equator all the time. It was cold because most of the sunlight was reflected off the Ice Caps back into space. The only way to revive Earth and replenish the atmosphere for larger populations of humans and animals was to tilt it 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun’s rays and increased volcanism with the Moon’s gravity. This released more CO2 into the atmosphere. Obviously they had done this before.
Bringing the Moon in by bouncing it off the Arctic Ocean tilted the Earth 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun's rays which doubled arable land and doubled the plankton growth in the oceans to replenish the oxygen. The book is: Cosmological Ice Ages.
My co-author and I used an online impact computer, Arizona.edu/impact effects. We put the mass of the Moon in there, 8.35 E 22 kilograms (this number included the 200-kilometer-thick coating of ice), the mass of the Earth 5.98 E 24 kilograms, an angel of 11 degrees and a speed of 2.5 kilometers per second. The resulting numbers that came back was that the Moon would depress Earth’s crust five kilometers. The Arctic Ocean is five kilometers deep above Alaska. The force of impact was 700 terra-megatons. It killed off all the tribes, horses, camels and mastodons in North America at a time when there were few humans living there. Mastodons were found with quick frozen with green food in their mouths caused by winds of 200+ miles per hour and temperatures of -200 degrees Fahrenheit caused by the vacuum of space behind the Moon.
There is only one object up there in space close to Earth with enough mass to tilt Earth 23.5 degrees and that object is the Moon. This had to be done to extend the life of the planet a few extra thousand years to enable humans to become conscious and become a type one civilization. (We are still a type zero.)
Finally, while the Anunnaki might have been the Gods and Goddesses of Sumerian and other ancient civilizations, it is also possible that the Anunnaki themselves might have had others to look up to and revere as superior beings. That may also be why they preferred the relative anonymity of having a natural looking space ship. Why not?----Especially after terra-forming Earth to suit their needs. To talk about this more call: (907) 283-1456 www.AlaskaPublishing.com and www.GuardDogBooks.com
Monday, December 14, 2009
NO GW/GC Earth is currently in an ice age.
There is no global warming or global cooling. There is no global warming or cooling. If you take a look at the Antarctic ice core graphs can see a history of earth temperature, Co2, methane, and dust dating back about three million years. There is one graph of benethic carbonate (carbon deposition on the sea floor) dating back 6-million years. Increased carbon deposition is an indication of increased light to Earth to cause plants to grow in the oceans.
Early Earth had a 750 PSI atmosphere. It was also in the Heronian Glaciation over one billion years. Such an atmosphere would extend over 2,500 feet above the Earth's surface. There was no way sunlight could break through such an atmosphere to thaw out the mile-deep sheets of ice over the oceans and get life started. Our Sun drifted near the ancient Procyon and Sirius multiple-star systems.
Note below how the average global temperature is the freezing point...
It was the additional light and heat from Sirius A and B that took Earth out of the billion-year Heronian Glaciation. Earth has lost over98% of its atmosphere. It was laid down as coal, oil and limestone from the invisible UV light from Sirius B in the 350 to 400 nanometer range. During this 650-million-year warm period Earth did not have ice caps. Then, about 2.5 million years ago an explosion in Orion caused our sun to loose its tractor beam with Sirius B and started making ellipses around this star system. The ellipses steadily grew to now we go out to nine light years and Ice Ages last 105,000 years.
We are now 8.5 light years from Sirius and heading toward it at 7.5 kilometers per second. Back Cover Text: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES God gave us a brain and if we refuse to use it he will be greatly disappointed. The authors solve the greatest mystery of all time by plotted our sun’s course from its birthplace in Orion. Little Sirius B with 1.5 times the gravity of our sun grabbed hold of us putting us into orbit around Sirius A. Our sun’s fortunate capture by the Sirius system took Earth out of a billion-year Ice Age with additional light and heat.
It took the power of a white dwarf putting out hundreds of times more UV than our sun to break through early Earth’s 1400 PSI C02 atmosphere and get life started on the surface of the waters. The invention of non-cyclic photosynthesis created eight times more food production that allowed predators to exist and gave us our free oxygen coal, oil and limestone made from carbon dioxide (Co2). Global warming is a hoax. Our sun doesn’t have enough power to keep us out of Ice Ages otherwise we wouldn’t have them! We are in an Ice Age! During all previous geologic ages when the majority of the coal, oil and limestone were made from Co2 Earth’s average temperature was 50 to 80 degrees Fahrenheit. The average temperature on Earth is now 32 degrees.
A stellar explosion three million years ago blasted our sun into an elliptical orbit where we go out to nine light years below the galactic plane. Co2 is plant food! Without Co2 everything on the planet dies and you can’t grow food. Our atmosphere is depleted to .033 % Co2 and our government wants to take your tax dollars to pump it underground???? Given the fact that 90% of our atmosphere is gone and that the major producer of free oxygen “diatoms” are disappearing; will stupid humans keep on burning things? We need to get a handle on this and start using sources of energy that don’t consume oxygen like geothermal, solar, wind and tide. This book is about the conscious enlightenment of humanity necessary to save itself from extinction.
www.alaskapublishing.com
GW/GC RELIGIOUS FREAKS IGNORE BASIC FACTS: EARTH IS AN ICE AGE WITH AN AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OF 32 DEGREES. The comments I get refuting basic logic that is available to all is evidence that something is wrong with the curriculums. Much of what we are taught was engineered for societal manipulation to keep us focused on the wrong things such as GW and GC.
I find it amusing when I get feedback about trees not growing above a certain level because there isn't enough Co2 plant food. Where do you think the carbon come from that makes carbon based life forms like THE SHEETROCK ON THE WALL? GW/GC nuts refuse to look up the facts. Co2 is plant food! Without Co2 the planet dies and you will starve to death. Co2 is a trace gas! It accounts for only .033% of our atmosphere.
If mankind were to some how able to double the amount of Co2 it would still be a trace gas at .066%. Co2 is also heavy. It is twice as heavy as oxygen and about 1/3 heavier than nitrogen so human release of Co2 is partially responsible for smog around cities because it tends to hang below the 3000-foot level until the wind mixes it up. Check out the specific gravity of Co2 compared with nitrogen and oxygen to verify this fact! Because Co2 is heavy, trees don't grow above a certain level because there isn't enough Co2 food for them to grow.. That is why there is a timberline duhh! Co2 is an extremely valuable resource. You got two oxygen atoms and one carbon atom. If you were smart you could burn it in your car or heat your home with it! The sheetrock on the wall of your house was made from Co2 using UV light from space.
The coal that heats your house and gives you electricity was made from Co2 using invisible UV light from space in the invisible 350 to 400 nanometer range. The oil and makes your car go down the road was made from Co2 and hydrogen. If anyone is interested where the energy came from to make our carbon resources read my book: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES or if you have no interest in where the free oxygen came from you are currently sucking into your lungs you can go on my web site and order a book about Sarah Palin or books about Barack Obama or John McCain all of which will not alter human release of Co2 in any way. Now methane! That's another story.
www.GuardDogBooks.com www.HankKroll.com also: www.AlaskaPublishing.com
Monday, December 7, 2009
Bogus GW/GC Earth is in an Ice Age
Al Gore made millions sellling phoney carbon credits. he money was supposed to be used to plant trees and other things that mop up CO2.
Check out the Al-stars video on the ‘new’ geology of the earth! This is the guy who is leading down the ‘global warming’ road!
Al Gore: Earth's Interior 'Extremely Hot, Several Million Degrees'
And yet he's STILL one of the liberal's top 'authorities' . . . facts don't matter, as long as you're appropriately liberal in your message . . . Al Gore: Earth's Interior 'Extremely Hot, Several Million Degrees'
By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
November 18, 2009 - 10:27 ET
For several years as uneducated sycophants in the media gushed and fawned over every utterance from former Vice President Al Gore, News Busters has informed readers of just how absurd the junk science he's peddling really is.
Last Thursday, NBC "Tonight Show" viewers got a perfect example of how the Nobel Laureate basically makes things up, and that his poor grades in college were quite an indicator of just how little he understands about science.
So egregious was his departure from reality that the following clip should be mandatory viewing for all his fans in the media who seem to be just as scientifically-challenged (video embedded below the fold with partial transcript,
Hot Air):
CONAN O'BRIEN, HOST: Now, what about ... you talk in the book about geothermal energy...
AL GORE, NOBEL LAUREATE: Yeah, yeah.
O'BRIEN: ...and that is, as I understand it, using the heat that's generated from the core of the earth ...
GORE: Yeah.
O'BRIEN: ...to create energy, and it sounds to me like an evil plan by Lex Luthor to defeat Superman. Can you, can you tell me, is this a viable solution, geothermal energy?
GORE: It definitely is, and it's a relatively new one. People think about geothermal energy - when they think about it at all - in terms of the hot water bubbling up in some places, but two kilometers or so down in most places there are these incredibly hot rocks, 'cause the interior of the earth is extremely hot, several million degrees, and the crust of the earth is hot ...
On Tuesday, National Review's John Derbyshire noted:
The geothermal gradient is usually quoted as 25-50 degrees Celsius per mile of depth in normal terrain (not, e.g., in the crater of Kilauea). Two kilometers down, therefore, (that's a mile and a quarter if you're not as science-y as Al) you'll have an average gain of 30-60 degrees - exploitable for things like home heating, though not hot enough to make a nice pot of tea. The temperature at the earth's core, 4,000 miles down, is usually quoted as 5,000 degrees Celsius, though these guys claim it's much less, while some contrarian geophysicists have posted claims up to 9,000 degrees. The temperature at the surface of the Sun is around 6,000 degrees Celsius, while at the center, where nuclear fusion is going on bigtime, things get up over 10 million degrees.
If the temperature anywhere inside the earth was "several million degrees," we'd be a star.
The physics and astronomy website Physlink also contests Gore's absurd claim:
It is approximately 4000°C at the centre of the Earth. To put this in context:
1. The centre of the Sun is approximately 15 million°C
2. The surface of the Sun is 5500°C
3. Iron melts at 1535°C (when at atmospheric pressure)
4. Water boils at 100°C (when at atmospheric pressure)
5. Human skin is comfortable with temperatures up to about 60°C
6. The highest temperature recorded on the Earth's surface is 58°C (Libya 1922)
It is not possible to directly measure the temperature at the centre of the Earth and four thousand degrees is nothing more than our most well-established piece of guesswork to date. Most modern calculations rely on the fact that we believe the inner core to be made up of iron and nickel that is just about at melting point. It is under a lot of pressure, which prevents it from melting, even at such high temperatures. There is also a lot of evidence regarding how the outer core of the Earth convects and that helps to establish the temperature. However, recently British scientists have suggested that the temperature of the Earth's core may in fact be as high as the surface of the Sun, so the question is still open.
As such, whether it's 4,000 or 6,000 degrees, Gore's claim of "several million" is absurdly preposterous and not based on ANY scientific fact.
As Ed Morrissey observed Wednesday:
[A]nyone who followed the controversy over Gore's piece of cinematic fantasy An Inconvenient Truth knows that Gore tells a lot of very convenient untruths in his quest to create a market for his carbon-trading company. However, this is just flat-out ignorance that with any other person in any other context would destroy their credibility. This is worse than Tom Cruise telling Matt Lauer that he can debunk the entire psychiatric field because he's read a few books. If Gore can't get this rather basic fact right, why should he be believed on anything else in the energy field?
This raises an obvious question: in a world where media fact-check a comedy skit and a book written by a former governor, shouldn't they equally scrutinize statements being made by a man who's actively pushing for the passage of economically impactful legislation currently before Congress?
Or is that asking too much from so-called journalists?
Consider that if Gore was a Republican, his numerous departures from fact would have so discredited him years ago that he would now be considered a total joke.By contrast, because he's a Democrat who preaches liberal gospel, he can say whatever he wants without any regard for its accuracy and not only receive media's praise for his inexcusable errance, but an Oscar and a Nobel Peace Prize to boot.
As the Russian comedian Yakov Smirnoff was famous for saying years ago, "America -- what a country!"
*****Update: NewsBusters reader Eric Peterkofsky pointed out at Facebook that Newsweek recently called Gore "The Thinking Man's Thinking Man."
Check out the Al-stars video on the ‘new’ geology of the earth! This is the guy who is leading down the ‘global warming’ road!
Al Gore: Earth's Interior 'Extremely Hot, Several Million Degrees'
And yet he's STILL one of the liberal's top 'authorities' . . . facts don't matter, as long as you're appropriately liberal in your message . . . Al Gore: Earth's Interior 'Extremely Hot, Several Million Degrees'
By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
November 18, 2009 - 10:27 ET
For several years as uneducated sycophants in the media gushed and fawned over every utterance from former Vice President Al Gore, News Busters has informed readers of just how absurd the junk science he's peddling really is.
Last Thursday, NBC "Tonight Show" viewers got a perfect example of how the Nobel Laureate basically makes things up, and that his poor grades in college were quite an indicator of just how little he understands about science.
So egregious was his departure from reality that the following clip should be mandatory viewing for all his fans in the media who seem to be just as scientifically-challenged (video embedded below the fold with partial transcript,
Hot Air):
CONAN O'BRIEN, HOST: Now, what about ... you talk in the book about geothermal energy...
AL GORE, NOBEL LAUREATE: Yeah, yeah.
O'BRIEN: ...and that is, as I understand it, using the heat that's generated from the core of the earth ...
GORE: Yeah.
O'BRIEN: ...to create energy, and it sounds to me like an evil plan by Lex Luthor to defeat Superman. Can you, can you tell me, is this a viable solution, geothermal energy?
GORE: It definitely is, and it's a relatively new one. People think about geothermal energy - when they think about it at all - in terms of the hot water bubbling up in some places, but two kilometers or so down in most places there are these incredibly hot rocks, 'cause the interior of the earth is extremely hot, several million degrees, and the crust of the earth is hot ...
On Tuesday, National Review's John Derbyshire noted:
The geothermal gradient is usually quoted as 25-50 degrees Celsius per mile of depth in normal terrain (not, e.g., in the crater of Kilauea). Two kilometers down, therefore, (that's a mile and a quarter if you're not as science-y as Al) you'll have an average gain of 30-60 degrees - exploitable for things like home heating, though not hot enough to make a nice pot of tea. The temperature at the earth's core, 4,000 miles down, is usually quoted as 5,000 degrees Celsius, though these guys claim it's much less, while some contrarian geophysicists have posted claims up to 9,000 degrees. The temperature at the surface of the Sun is around 6,000 degrees Celsius, while at the center, where nuclear fusion is going on bigtime, things get up over 10 million degrees.
If the temperature anywhere inside the earth was "several million degrees," we'd be a star.
The physics and astronomy website Physlink also contests Gore's absurd claim:
It is approximately 4000°C at the centre of the Earth. To put this in context:
1. The centre of the Sun is approximately 15 million°C
2. The surface of the Sun is 5500°C
3. Iron melts at 1535°C (when at atmospheric pressure)
4. Water boils at 100°C (when at atmospheric pressure)
5. Human skin is comfortable with temperatures up to about 60°C
6. The highest temperature recorded on the Earth's surface is 58°C (Libya 1922)
It is not possible to directly measure the temperature at the centre of the Earth and four thousand degrees is nothing more than our most well-established piece of guesswork to date. Most modern calculations rely on the fact that we believe the inner core to be made up of iron and nickel that is just about at melting point. It is under a lot of pressure, which prevents it from melting, even at such high temperatures. There is also a lot of evidence regarding how the outer core of the Earth convects and that helps to establish the temperature. However, recently British scientists have suggested that the temperature of the Earth's core may in fact be as high as the surface of the Sun, so the question is still open.
As such, whether it's 4,000 or 6,000 degrees, Gore's claim of "several million" is absurdly preposterous and not based on ANY scientific fact.
As Ed Morrissey observed Wednesday:
[A]nyone who followed the controversy over Gore's piece of cinematic fantasy An Inconvenient Truth knows that Gore tells a lot of very convenient untruths in his quest to create a market for his carbon-trading company. However, this is just flat-out ignorance that with any other person in any other context would destroy their credibility. This is worse than Tom Cruise telling Matt Lauer that he can debunk the entire psychiatric field because he's read a few books. If Gore can't get this rather basic fact right, why should he be believed on anything else in the energy field?
This raises an obvious question: in a world where media fact-check a comedy skit and a book written by a former governor, shouldn't they equally scrutinize statements being made by a man who's actively pushing for the passage of economically impactful legislation currently before Congress?
Or is that asking too much from so-called journalists?
Consider that if Gore was a Republican, his numerous departures from fact would have so discredited him years ago that he would now be considered a total joke.By contrast, because he's a Democrat who preaches liberal gospel, he can say whatever he wants without any regard for its accuracy and not only receive media's praise for his inexcusable errance, but an Oscar and a Nobel Peace Prize to boot.
As the Russian comedian Yakov Smirnoff was famous for saying years ago, "America -- what a country!"
*****Update: NewsBusters reader Eric Peterkofsky pointed out at Facebook that Newsweek recently called Gore "The Thinking Man's Thinking Man."
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Greatest Mystery of All Time Solved
Cosmological Ice Ages
by Henry Kroll 384 pages 8.5 by 11; quality trade paperback (softcover); Catalog #08-0164; ISBN 1-4251-7062-5; US$31.35, C$31.35, EUR21.42, £16.19
About the Book
I plotted our sun’s course through space to discover that our sun was born in the constellation Orion. After the planets were formed Earth was covered with a five-mile-thick coating of ice one billion years. We eventually drifted near the Sirius multiple star system and little Sirius B (1.5 solar masses) grabbed hold of our sun putting it in orbit around Sirius A.
The Horse Head nebuls is located in Orion--possible birthplace of our sun....................................................
Sirius B is the only object in the neighborhood that could possibley break through early earth's 750 PSI atmosphere to get plants to grow in the oceans and release free oxygen.
Our sun does not have enough power to keep us out of the ice ages otherwise we wouldn’t have them! It was the additional light and heat from Sirius star system that melted the ice caps and got life started in the oceans.
Earth is losing its atmosphere. During the rein of the dinosaurs the atmospheric pressure was around 30 pounds per square inch. Now it is down to 14.5 pounds per square inch. Before our sun was captured by the Sirius system earth had an atmosphere of 750 pounds per square inch. Over time and it was laid down as coal, oil and limestone using photosynthesis and light from these giant stars. We have a limited time to get our act together and get off the planet to seed life in other biospheres.
http://www.guarddogbooks.com/http://www.alaskapublishing.com/
http://www.guarddogbooks.com/http://www.alaskapublishing.com/
