Showing posts with label Al Gore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al Gore. Show all posts

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Anthony Scalia opposed CLIMATE CHANGE INITIATIVE>murdered?

Obama was put into office for one reason and one reason only. He was put into office to end capitalism, private property ownership and the individual’s right to self-determination. This is all accomplished through Agenda 21 and ultimately what Patrick Wood calls technocracy. Technocracy is the take over of all energy use, thus, ultimately, all finance, through programs such as capping CO2 emission, Cap and Trade, etc.  Carbon credits, under this system is destined to become the new currency.
     When Obama was first elected, he attempted to introduce legislation into the Senate which would have reduced energy output for the United States by 80%. Even the then liberal Senate promptly rejected his proposal. That defeat set Obama into another strategy of implementation, it would have to happen piecemeal and some of the change would have to be implemented at the local level (eg California’s Cap and Trade program). However, the change for this President’s ego did not come fast enough because we are in the final year of Obama’s presidency and he has not completed his main task and HIS ENTIRE CLIMATE CHANGE INITIATIVE WAS REJECTED BY THE CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF THE SUPREME COURT BY A 5-4 DEFEAT!!! Scalia was the main opponent.
     This defeat of Obama’s entire climate change initiative should not be overlooked as it puts the United States in direct collision course with the United Nations’ recent COP 21 agreements in Paris, which was blocked in a 5-4 vote by the Supreme Court, only last week. Again, Justice Scalia was the main opponent. This fact alone should have provided the impetus to conduct an INDEPENDENT autopsy on Scalia’s body.


But as they say in the infomercials, there’s more….
Following the Gulf oil explosion in 2010, I wrote a seven part series entitled The Great Gulf Coast Holocaust. It was in that series that I discovered the unmistakable reason that Obama was made president.
Obama (when he was still a still a State Senator in Illinois), Valerie Jarrett and Al Gore headed a group known as the Joyce Foundation. The Joyce Foundation was designed to promote acceptance for carbon trading schemes which could be linked back to George Soros and Al Gore. The intent, as I have previously mentioned was to gain control over the entire economy. The Joyce Foundation eventually set up the Chicago Climate Exchange which was nation’s first bona fide carbon trading company. When Obama’s original carbon trading scheme was rejected in the Senate in 2009, the organization collapsed financially. But Obama’s dream of technocracy did not die with it.
The Joyce Foundation was also instrumental in bringing together NALCO, Goldman Sachs and the EPA in allowing the oil dispersant, Corexit, to be used in the Gulf even though, for health reasons, it had been banned by virtually the entire G20 nations. The conspiracy trail is mighty when it comes to Obama and his pre-presidential years and his complicity into the climate change issue. It was when Obama first became involved in the Joyce Foundation that George Soros, David Rockefeller and company backed this relative unknown for President. By the way, the late Bob Chapman and I both covered how Obama benefited from the use of Corexit through his Vanguard Investment funds (I and II). The link to this claim is listed above.
After I read volumes of material on the Joyce Foundation, it was easy to conclude that Obama was chosen to be President because he would virtually hand over the entire economy to a few wealthy bankers under the guise of climate change. The historical parallel matches why the banksters in 1912 backed Woodrow Wilson for President. The following year, the nation’s banking system was handed over the Rockefellers and their merry gang of banksters and the rest is history.
Conclusion

Scalia was the major impediment to Obama completing his legacy of ushering in technocracy. This, alone, is motive for murder. And when an autopsy is not conducted on a Supreme Court Justice, and then his “Catholic” body is cremated, we should all be more than suspicious.

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/02/16/the-motive-behind-the-murder-of-justice-scalia/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-motive-behind-the-murder-of-justice-scala.

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

RISING SEA LEVELS IN EQUATORIAL REGIONS?

I took the NOAA tide web sites (below) over to my engineer friend. He went into NOAA's tide data further looking at other places around the world. It appears that in most Northern and southern latitudes the sea levels are falling. Norway and New Zeland tide levels are falling but around the Tropic of Cancer and equatorial regions the sea levels are rising. Interesting!!

As the Earth spins the tide water is moving toward the equator? What's up with that? What does have to do with global warming or cooling??? Maybe as the oceans heat up at the Equator the water expands slightly and becomes lighter causing sea levels to rise? Are underwater volcanoes causing the water to heat up. Is this a normal occurrence caused by El Nino?

Is the Earth spinning faster due to a galactic time shift? Is the Moon's gravity increasing? Who can shed some light on this? 


TIDE LEVELS FALLING 3-FEET IN 100-YEARS.










Mean Sea Level Trend
9455500 Seldovia, Alaska

The mean sea level trend is -10.24 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 0.82 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from
1964 to 2014 which is equivalent to a change of -3.36 feet in 100 years.


Mean Sea Level Trend
9455760 Nikiski, Alaska

The mean sea level trend is -10.52 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 1.11 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from
1973 to 2014 which is equivalent to a change of -3.45 feet in 100 years


Mean Sea Level Trend
9457292 Kodiak Island, Alaska

The mean sea level trend is -10.77 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 0.91 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from
1975 to 2014 which is equivalent to a change of -3.53 feet in 100 years.

Sunday, September 6, 2015

DO YOU BELIEVE SEA LEVELS ARE RISING???

GO TO THESE WEB SITES TO CHECK IT OUT YOURSELF...

TIDE LEVELS FALLING 3-FEET IN 100-YEARS. Its about big corporations making billions constructing bogus sea walls etc.. and taking money from you. 








Mean Sea Level Trend
9455500 Seldovia, Alaska

The mean sea level trend is -10.24 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 0.82 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from
1964 to 2014 which is equivalent to a change of -3.36 feet in 100 years.


Mean Sea Level Trend
9455760 Nikiski, Alaska

The mean sea level trend is -10.52 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 1.11 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from
1973 to 2014 which is equivalent to a change of -3.45 feet in 100 years


Mean Sea Level Trend
9457292 Kodiak Island, Alaska


The mean sea level trend is -10.77 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 0.91 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from
1975 to 2014 which is equivalent to a change of -3.53 feet in 100 years.

FYI CO2 is a trace gas at .033% of our Atmosphere. If humans could some how double it would be .066% and still be a trace gas necessary to grow food.


Tuesday, September 3, 2013

DEFINITELY WORTH READING...

Subject: Fw: CO2 - worth a read
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 17:23:44 -0700

Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne, professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide, and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies. He has published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopedia of Geology.
These are his extensive credentials.
Born12 February 1946 (age 67)
ResidenceAustralia
NationalityAustralian
Fields
Institutions
Alma mater
ThesisThe pipe deposits of tungsten-molybdenum-bismuth in eastern Australia (1976)
Notable awardsEureka Prize (1995, 2002),Centenary Medal(2003), Clarke Medal (2004)
Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From?
Professor Ian Plimer's book in a brief summary.



PLIMER: "Okay, here's the bombshell. The volcanic eruption in Iceland . Since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet - all of you.
Of course, you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress - it’s that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.
I know....it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kids "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad,nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50 cent light bulbs with $10.00 light bulbs.....well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.
The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes, FOUR DAYS - by that volcano in Iceland has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time - EVERY DAY.
I don't really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the volcano Mt Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.
Yes, folks, Mt Pinatubo was active for over One year - think about it.
Of course, I shouldn't spoil this 'touchy-feely tree-hugging' moment and mention the effect of solar and cosmic activity and the well-recognized 800-year global heating and cooling cycle, which
keeps happening despite our completely insignificant efforts to affect climate change.
And I do wish I had a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud, but the fact of the matter is that the bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.
Just remember that your government just tried to impose a whopping carbon tax on you, on the basis of the bogus 'human-caused' climate-change scenario.
Hey, isn’t it interesting how they don’t mention 'Global Warming' anymore, but just 'Climate Change' - you know why?
It’s because the planet has COOLED by 0.7 degrees in the past century and these global warming bullshitartists got caught with their pants down.
And, just keep in mind that you might yet have an Emissions Trading Scheme - that whopping new tax - imposed on you that will achieve absolutely nothing except make you poorer.
It won’t stop any volcanoes from erupting, that’s for sure.
But, hey, .....go give the world a hug and have a nice day.

Saturday, August 24, 2013

1947 ~ 1948 UFO's

1947-1948
The year was 1947. Some of you will recall that on July 8, 1947, a little more than 65 years ago, numerous witnesses claim that an Unidentified Flying Object, (UFO), with five aliens aboard, crashed onto a sheep and mule ranch just outside Roswell , New Mexico .

This is a well-known incident that many say has long been covered-up by the U.S. Air Force, as well as other Federal Agencies and Organizations .

However, what you may NOT know is that in the month of April, year 1948, nine months after the historic day, the following people were born:

Barrack Obama Sr.

Albert A. Gore, Jr.

Hillary Rodham

William J. Clinton

John F. Kerry

Howard Dean

Nancy Pelosi

Dianne Feinstein

Charles E. Schumer

Barbara Boxer

Joe Biden


This is the obvious consequence of aliens breeding with sheep and jack-asses

I truly hope this bit of information clears up a lot of things for you. It certainly did for me.

And now you can stop wondering why they support the bill to help all Illegal Aliens.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

HOW TO DESTROY AMERICA ~ Ronald Reagan...

We know Dick Lamm as
the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are
particularly poignant. Last
week there was an
immigration overpopulation conference in Washington, DC., filled to capacity
by many of America's
finest minds and leaders. A
brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about
his latest book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and
illegal was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would
march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American
Dream.

Moments later, former
Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how
to destroy
America.


The audience sat spell
bound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United
States. He said, "If you
believe that America is too
smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not
that hard to do. No
nation in history has
survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great
civilizations rise and fall
and that ‘An autopsy of
history would show that all great nations commit
suicide.’”


"Here is how they do
it," Lamm said.

"First, to destroy
America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural
country. History shows that no
nation can survive the
tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and
cultures. It is a bless-
ing for an individual to be bilingual; however,
it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar,
Seymour
Lipset, put it
this way: ‘The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not
assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.’ Canada, Belgium,
Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which
minorities
press for
autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria
suppressed an ethnic rebellion.
France faces difficulties
with Basques, Bretons, Corsicans and Muslims."


Lamm went
on:

"Second, to destroy
America, invent 'multi-culturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain
their culture. Make it
an article of belief that
all cultures are equal; that there are no cultural differences. Make it an
article of faith that
the Black and Hispanic
dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the
majority. Every other
explanation is out of
bounds."

"Third, we could make
the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to
celebrate diversity
rather than unity. As
Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent
success of our own multi-
ethnic and multicultural experiment might have
been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the domin-
ance
that once dictated ethnocentrism and what it meant to be an American, we are
left with only tolerance and plural-
ism to hold us together.' Lamm said,
"I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I
would
replace the
melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure
that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their
differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their
similarities."

"Fourth, I would make
our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a
second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our
population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% drop
out rate
from high school."

"My fifth point for destroying America
would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of
money.
I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult
of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that
their lack of success was
the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all
minority failure on the majority
placation."

"My sixth plan for America's downfall
would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would
celebrate
diversity
over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse
people worldwide are mostly engaged
in hating each other - that
is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable
society is against
most
historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation
together. Look at the ancient Greeks.
The Greeks believed that they
belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature;
and they
worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic
games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their
liberty. Yet all these bonds
were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and
geographical condi-
tions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell.
"E. Pluribus Unum" - From many, one. In that historical reality, if
we
put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will "
Balkanize " America as surely as
Kosovo."

"Next to last, I would place all
subjects off limits. Make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult
of 'diversity.' I
would
find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like
'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt
discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country,
having establish-
ed multi-culturalism, having the large foundations fund
the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible
to enforce our immigration
laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for
America, it
must always
be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the
cumulative impact of millions
of
them."

In the last minute of his
speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he
said, "Lastly, I
would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book 'Mexifornia.'
His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If
you feel America deserves to
be destroyed, don't read that
book."

There was no applause. A
chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the
conference.
Every
American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding
methodically, quietly, darkly,
yet pervasively across the
United States today. Discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are
ripping the
foundation
of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Even barbaric cultures
that practice female genital
mutilation are growing as we
celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as
corporations
create a
Third World in America. Take note of California and other states. To date,
ten million illegal aliens and growing
fast. It is reminiscent of
George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in
the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and
"Ignorance is strength."

Governor Lamm walked back to
his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the
future of this
great
democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this
immigration monster stopped within three
years, it will rage like a
California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The
American Dream.

If you care for and love our
country as I do, take the time to pass this on just as I did for you.
Nothing is going to happen
if you
don't!


"If we ever forget
that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under"
~Ronald Reagan~

Monday, April 15, 2013

Cosmological Ice Ages.


MOON DEPOSITS FROZEN METHANE?

Scientists would like to have everything fit into neat little packages so they say that all the planets in our solar system were all formed at the same time when the sun was formed. So far everything astronomers have looked at in our solar system is different from everything else. Everything looks like it was brought in from some other system. Obviously planet swapping is a common thing. The scientific paradigm is being broken every day. This latest moon theory of mine will put me in the loony bin for sure. Pun intended! ☺The real funny part is that my friend, Brad Guth and several other people who I have showed the data to agree with me.

After studying the May 2006 issue of National Geographic ® map some more the question came to mind:
"How did all that frozen methane get down there under the earth's crust?" "How did the frozen methane get buried under the ocean floors all over the world?" There is no way methane could freeze and stay frozen on the earth's surface. How can it remain frozen when it is buried deep in the earth's crust where it is supposed to be hot? It had to be brought in from some place else. It has been noted that some of the moons in our solar system are covered with a thick layer of methane ice.

Europa orbits Jupiter once in exactly the same amount of time that it takes to complete one rotation and therefore keeps a single face toward the planet at all times. Does this sound like our moon? It is estimated that Europa is covered with a 100 kilometer deep ocean of slushy ice. The moon's orbit is not a completely smooth ellipse because Europa is pulled by the gravity as it passes by the nearby moons Ganymede and Io, other moons around Jupiter. Gravitational forces flex the interior thus keeping it warm.


Pictures taken by the Galileo Orbiter indicate that geysers erupt along the cracks in the ice suggesting that Europa has an ocean of water underneath and scientists think that Europa may actually harbor life in its' deep ocean. The spacecraft's magnetometer recorded regular changes in the direction of Europa's magnetic field that correspond to fluctuations in Jupiter's magnetic field according to it position. This suggests that Europa has an underlying material that conducts electricity, such as a salty ocean! There is more than one salty moon in our solar system and where did they come from? Given the aforementioned data there is a good chance that our moon may have had a salty ocean before it collided with earth and since our moon is bigger than Europa it could have had a thicker coating of ice-in the neighborhood of 200 kilometers.

ICE ON OTHER PLANETS AND MOONS
There are ice rings around the planet Saturn. There are also ice rings around Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune. The asteroid Vesta, is the brightest. It is so shiny that it must be covered with ice. Saturn and Uranus also have icy satellites. Comets, like Halley's Comet, have very long and elliptical orbits. Nereid, one of Neptune's moons, has a very elliptical orbit.

Saturn's moon, Enceladus that is 310 miles in diameter erupts plums of water vapor and ice particles that smooth its surface and replenishes the E-ring. Thethys, Dione, and Rhea also have thick coatings of ice. Titan which is much larger than Mercury may have a rocky core, possibly surrounded by a "mantel" and "crust." In other words, is may exhibit a structure similar to that of Earth. It has a dense atmosphere, weather erosion, and pools of liquid methane. In fact, it is the only known planetary satellite with a dense atmosphere-possibly denser that that of Earth. -[Science from New Worlds, NASA CORE Central Operation of Resources for Educators slide program and script.]

Our moon's mass is 7.35E22 kg and is about 384,000 km from the earth. These figures were from http://www.seds.org/billa/tnp/datamax.html.

FROZEN METHANE IS NOT FROM THIS PLANET
The only way to make frozen methane on a small planet or moon is to create a strong methane and water atmosphere using anaerobic microorganisms. Then put that planet out into the vast cold of space so the atmosphere freezes into ice. If someone has a better solution we would like to hear it.
My French, Scientist and Chemist friend, Jean Linares writes, "I have read attentively your very interesting document about where the moon came from. I share with you the fact that the frozen methane is not from this planet and your explanation about the probable process (a combination of helium-4 with carbon during the gigantic impacts of the icy moon is correct-by transmutation of chemical elements (Kervran Effect)."

A PLANETARY CRIME
Our moon came in at a low angle to earth of ten to twenty degrees, looking much like Europa; a ball of rock 2160 miles in diameter covered with a layer of frozen methane and saltwater 150 kilometers deep, with a thick methane atmosphere of its own. At this point in time the earth's atmosphere was somewhat thicker. Brad Guth found a mention that early earth billions of years ago had an atmospheric pressure of 50 bars, which is 725 pounds per square inch. We mention early on in this book that scientists measured the chest cavities of dinosaurs to discover that they could not exist in today's atmosphere because their lung capacity was too small for their body mass. It was then postulated that the atmospheric pressure had to have been around thirty pounds per square inch at the time of the dinosaurs 140 to 160-million years ago. After reviewing the ancient atmospheric pressure figures it become apparent that earth is loosing its atmosphere.
As our icy moon came into the thick atmosphere of earth the moon's ice covering would have cushioned the blow. The polar icecap on earth would also have had some cushioning effect. The heat from atmospheric friction pealed off massive chunks of ice the size of West Virginia, Rhode Island and New York striking the earth creating the long chain of lakes as it traveled northwest into Canada. Giant "spaceburgs" of methane and water fell off the moon making Lake Superior, Lake Winnipeg, Lake Churchill, Lake Athabasca, Great Slave Lake and Great Bear Lake. These huge lakes were laid down in a slightly curved line to the southeast due to the moon's parabolic ascent into orbit. This curve is more evidence that they were made by falling spaceburgs because the angel of climb lessened as it departed earth. All the lakes are irregular in shape with sharp edges as if made by large chunks of ice. If they were made by glaciers the corners would be rounded. Shards of methane and water ice dropped at low altitude made these lakes.

There is some glacier material laying on the surface but this may have been deposited by ice ages that covered the northern hemisphere at a later date. We need to determine the depth of these lakes and compare them with each other to see if they were formed in the same way. If they are the approximately the same depth to width ratio then there is a good possibility they were formed the same way and there may even be frozen methane underneath.

If the chain of lakes extending from the Arctic Ocean to the Great Lakes is a result of the southern extent of the polar ice cap as most geologists say and not the result of falling ice then one can determine where the north rotational pole was during the ice age by placing a drawing compass on a globe. You open the compass up to the point where the radius of the compass matched the curve of the lakes and place the other end on the globe. The north rotational pole was 23.5 degrees further south placing it very near Iceland. By tilting the Earth it doubled the amount of grazing land and increased the productivity of the world's oceans by 100 %.

Please review copy of map with North Pole on the coast of Greenland east of Iceland. If you subtract 23.5 degrees inclination from 90 degrees present position of the pole it comes out to where the old rotational pole of the earth was near the Arctic Circle west of Iceland on the Greenland coast. I wanted to know where the rotational pole was before the moon hit so I took child's circle maker-compass and lined up the circle with the radius of the Great Lakes, Great Bear Lake and Lake Victoria which geologists say was the southern extent of the ice sheet during the last ice age. If you put the center of the circle maker west of Iceland at 23.5 south and continue round it pretty much matches the southern extent of the ice during the last ice age in Europe as well.
.
Several years after I wrote the book more data came out about the southern extent of the ice during the last Ice Age. The ice cap extended south as far as Georgia and northern Florida but the California coast redwood trees were spared. The high altitude mountain ranges were covered with glaciers but the coastal areas of Alaska and interior were open grass land. Small salmon runs spawn at the mouth of rivers. I have stone tools and chisels that were made by giant humans that lived  at the mouth of these small streams during the last Ice Age. In one area there is a stone house with a stone table and stone chairs. The chairs are much to big for modern humans to sit in because your legs wouldn't touch the floor. Sea levels were 300-feet lower at the time so it would be possible for people to walk the coastline from Russia to the Americas.

The vacuum behind the moon as it came in must have exceeded 800 mile per hour ripping up many thousands of square miles of forests. Any tribes of hunter-gatherers living in the area were buried alive along with tons of trees and other debris. The Navajo and Sioux tribes in the southwest who were in a position to observe and understand what was happening to them went underground to avoid the catastrophe. Tribal legends speak of living underground for a very long time and coming back to the surface when the cataclysm was over. Five and a half thousand years passed before the first archaeological records show human habitation on Kodiak Island in Alaska.

After our moon plunged into the Arctic Ocean (creating the Arctic Ocean) there was total chaos for several thousand years such as extreme earthquakes and volcanism all over the earth. Vast herds of animals were picked up by the wind and dumped in heaps while others were flash-frozen with green leaves still in their mouths while looking up to the sky. They actually found quick frozen mamoths with buttercup flowers in their mouths.

While building the Alcan Highway to Alaska, construction workers found flash-frozen mammoths buried standing up with green food still in their stomachs. Recently I have had this verified first hand by oil workers digging on the North Slope who had dug up similar finds. Several native Alaskans from northern Alaska told me personally of finding musk ox, bison and mammoths found flash-frozen standing up and looking up in the sky with green food still in their mouths. Another well-documented story in books about the building of the Alcan Highway to Alaska tells about road crews discovering frozen meat buried in permafrost for thousands of years. The camp cook served up some of the 12,000-year-old quick-frozen, mammoth meat.
After the Moon hit the earth was suddenly plunged into darkness lasting several hundred years while dirty snow began a new mini ice age that lasted two-thousand years. A meteorite (possibly ice from the Moon) fell into the south Atlantic about the same time threw whales up into the mountains of New York State and the Carolina s  I believe this event happened about the same time as when the mastodons and other animals were quick-frozen in northern Canada and Alaska.

This is planetary forensics. Where did the bullet go? There was an old mystery book where a person was murdered and they couldn't prosecute the killer because they couldn't find the bullet. It turned out that the bullet was made of ice and had simply melted. In this case the bullet could have been frozen methane.




When the moon hit earth with a force of 650-tera-mega-tons it compressed the Arctic Ocean flattening the crust of the earth at the pole to a depth of 5 kilometers. The sea floor bounced back up to 3 kilometers and filled in with sediment to an average depth of 1.3 kilometers. Hydrographic maps of the Arctic Ocean confirm these depths with the deepest measured at 5 kilometers. The impact knocked earth's rotational pole 23.5 degrees from the middle of the continent of Greenland to its present position in relation to the sun giving earth summer and winter seasons. Before the moon hit the earth there were only small seasons due to Earths elliptical orbit around the sun.

MOON RESPONSIBLE FOR EQUATORIAL BULGE
The moon's collision at the pole may have created the earth's equatorial bulge. Impact craters are usually ten times the diameter of the meteor but when you slow an object down it doesn't hold true. When you have two atmospheres acting as buffers plus (by Brad's shallow, moon-meteor-crater calculations) 253 kilometers of ice to cushion the blow it would have depressed the crust of the earth to a depth of 5.3 kilometers. Our moon would have had to come in at a low angel and bounced off at the 27,000 miles-hour, escape velocity (possibly much less due to its large mass) in order to go in orbit around earth.

The minimum distance it would have to bounce out into space to still remain in orbit would be the geosynchronous orbit point of 28,000 miles. This is the point above the earth where a satellite will remain over one place on earth because its orbit speed matching the rotational speed of the earth. Remaining in the geosynchronous orbit wouldn't help keep earth warm nor would it create tides to oxygenate the oceans so its impact speed had to have exceeded escape velocity.

After the impact there would have been helices tides thousands of feet high as the moon made several highly elliptical orbits around earth. It eventually settled into its present orbit with one side facing earth. Noah would have had one heck of a wild ride...

Where it impacted the North Slope it drove tons of methane ice underground and chemically altered the existing oil strata and squeezed it into pockets. The water brought in was enough to raise sea levels more than 300 feet. I say this because archeologists looking for human habitation that existed before 13,000 years ago are finding ancient beaches and artifacts at that level. Most of the earth was made uninhabitable for three thousand years. It would have been a rough time for any life to exist on earth because the volcanism and resultant atmospheric dust pumped into the stratosphere would have blotted out the sun for a long time.
I call on my readers to find the fingerprint on the moon. There should be a negative replica of the undersea ridges of the Arctic Ocean imprinted on the moon someplace. Take a polar projection relief map of the ocean bottom, make a negative of it and make it the same scale as your map of the moon and compare the fingerprint. The deepest part of the Arctic Ocean is the Canadian Basin just north of the Brooks Range. Going northwest it shallows up considerably to what they call the Northwind Escarpment and the Chukchi Plateau. Another 500 miles north is the Mendeleyev Plain and the Mendeleyev Ridge then the Pole Plain. Heading South toward Russia is the Lomosov Ridge. Brad Guth recently found a large crater on the bottom of the moon that fits the profile.

How much DNA did the moon drop off on earth? Given the volume of ice and water there is a very good chance that it dropped off quite a bit. Life coming in from space was first envisioned by the theory of Transthermia where scientists theorize that many forms of life including the common cold viruses are brought in from space.

In 2001 a meteorite exploded above India depositing an estimated 50 tons of material on earth. It rained red material over a small area which appeared to be growing. Scientists gathered up quite a bit of this material and put it in culture mediums. It grew and appeared to be alive but it has no DNA. They still have the material. Could it be some kind of chemical life form?

How many whales and porpoise and carp did the moon drop off? There could have been a whole plethora of DNA seeded to earth at this time. How many sturgeon, trout, cod and northern pike were released into our ecosystem?

Currently there is enough water on earth to cover the surface to an average depth of 8000 feet-that is if the earth were perfect sphere. Some of the water on our planet could have come from our moon during that collision.

If there was 163 kilometers of ice on our moon before it collided with earth it would have brought in 1/4 of our water. It would be Kevin Costner's Water World © for sure. I think a good portion of the ice was frozen methane. If we knew the water-ice methane ratio on Europa then we might get a better handle on the math.

One side of the Moon is all beat to Hell with meteorites while the side facing us is relatively smooth. The giant maria have very few meteor creators. What protected them from meteor impacts? Were they covered with ice sheets 13,000 years ago. Why is their color so dark? Is it possible that the darkness is salt residu? What causes the thousand-mile-long rills?

The area of a sphere is 4pi radius squared. The radius of earth is 3962 miles to its area works out to 197-million square miles. The Moon's radius is 1080 miles and its surface area is 14, 657, 724 square miles. The earth has 13.457 times more surface area than the moon. If you took the 88-mile thick ice on the moon and spread it over the earth it would cover the earth with a 6.5-mile-thick coating of ice. The moon could very well have brought half the water into earth and then some but a good portion of the ice was frozen methane. After it hit about 10 percent of the methane was trapped underground on earth. This then would agree with what we are seeing on earth today. Some of the water may have been lost into space when the moon came in and more when it departed. Some of the methane and water is still stored in vast underground oceans here on earth and some was created by the meteor impact.

According to the managers of the major, oil companies here in Alaska there is 37 trillion cubic feet of gas on the North Slope and another 14 trillion cubic feet yet to be discovered. Most oil fields are ancient meteor impact zones. It takes a little more oomph to united the hydrogen in deep underground water reserviors with the carbon to make hydrocarbons. However some oil is created when limestone plates are being subducted along the ring of fire. The oil perculates up into pools near the surface like in the Los Angeles Basin.

Our moon theory opens up a new Pandora's Box of questions such as: "When did this happen?" and "Was this the event that occurred 12,718 years ago that instantly froze wooly mammoths in the standing position with green food still in their mouths?" When I mentioned this theory to Brad he got so excited that you could hear the enthusiasm in his voice over the phone. He instantly started measuring the radius of the Brooks Range to compute the size of the object to see if it would compare with our moon. The reason there are no moons around the inner planets is because friction from the solar wind slows them down to where they impact their planets or go off into the sun.

Apparently there are many kinds of icy moons out there. Europa is slightly smaller than our moon with a layer of ice 100 kilometers thick. Sedna, a newly-discovered planet in our Kuppier belt beyond Pluto, has a density of two grams per cubic centimeter. It is also slightly smaller than our moon and is red in color due to iron oxides. It is believed to be covered with a layer of ice. It can be detected by amateur astronomers with good backyard telescopes because its precise location is known.

We used an interactive, impact calculator to calculate the force of meteorite impacts. www.Arizona.edu/impacteffects
You simply put in the size of the earth 5.98 E 24 the mass of the moon 8.5E 22 along with the angel of 11 degrees and a velocity of 2 kilometers per second which is the minimum we figured to get the moon back into orbit.. FYI: all these figures including the mass of the Sun, Moon and stars are available by Google search. Please look these things up yoursel and do the math to see if we are correct.

With an incoming velocity of 2 kilometers per second, which is slightly more than the moons current speed coming in at a ten degree angel it would release a force of 600 to 650 terra megatons of energy. The size of the crater would be 1170 miles in diameter or about 1800 kilometers. The depth of the crater would be 5 kilometers and bounce back up to 2.86 kilometers. The average depth of the Arctic Ocean is 1.3 kilometers however it is considerably deeper north of Prudo Bay-up to five kilometers. Additionally it is about 1800 kilometers across!

The above figures are based on the moon being solid rock and not methane and water. The web site has formulas for water impacts but it takes some rearranging of the internal navigation. The figures are also based on today's atmosphere being 14.5 pounds per square inch instead of a more realistic 25 pounds per square inch. Such conditions would slow the incoming moon down considerably. Normally, meteorites within our solar system come in at velocities between fifty thousand to one hundred thousand miles per hour. The moon's current orbital speed is 19,051 miles per hour. Given an original velocity of 70,000 miles per hour and mitigating circumstances of a thick layer of ice, a thicker layer of atmosphere and the amount of salt in the seas, plus a salty lunar atmosphere our lunar impact theory appears to be a strong possibility.
Brad Guth thinks my figures are off and is insistent that the moon came in at a lower entry angle with a speed of only two kilometers per second. He says it lost very little of its initial speed after the impact due to its large mass and the fact that large masses are harder to slow down. It's the "Q-ball effect." Brad's moon figures would have caused less devastation to earth's ecosystem and I have to admit he could be right.

Tiauanaco was at sea level was pushed up 13,000 feet and the earthquake resistant stone strucures held together with bronze pins was left in ruins.












People were living at the advanced city complex or Tiawanaku (Tiahuanaco, Tihunacu) and Puma Punku 15,000 years ago. This was one giant city complex at one time but was put up to the 13,000 foot level by some giant cataclysm. I now believe it was the Moon impacting the Earth that depressed the Earth's crust at the North Pole 5-kilometers that raised up the entire Continent of Antarctica several thousand feet along with parts of South America.

We can't cut such perfect stone blocks used in the construction and made of diorite, a substance as hard as granite. Perfectly strait saw cuts 1/8-inch wide and small holes were drilled through this very hard stone... Obviously they were more advanced than we are today. Dr. Robert M. Shoch places the time of this sudden rise in elevation at 9600 BCE. This agrees with Antarctic ice core data analyzed by two Norwegians as to when Earth came out of the last Ice Age and it also agrees with my estimation of when the Moon was brought into orbit around Earth 12.718 years ago. So we are off by 118 years. The calendars are probably off by that much.


If we had access to information about how long ice will last in the vacuum of space we might be able to tie up a few of the loose ends but there is absolutely no data available. You would think that since water and ice means everything to humanity they would do something about getting data on this subject but no! NASA has no information about ice in space. No experiments were ever done and no experiments are planned. No funding, no research, no nothing. Wouldn't it be interesting to see what would happen to an ice cube on the moon? It's a good thing they didn't do the ice cube experiment because it would probably explode killing one of the astronauts. An ice cube put in a near total vacuum and subjected to extreme radiation would instantly turn to steam. Never once has anyone put an ice cube in space so we are completely in the dark. We need to know how long a cubic meter of ice will last in space. All the science about icy moons and comets is meaningless because all they can do is guess and they are putting the guesses in NASA's Koran as absolute.
After the collision the moon would have had enough speed left over to go back into orbit (escape velocity is 11.2 kilometers per second). Currently the moon is receding from earth a little over one inch per year and traveling at a speed of 980 kilometers per second or 19,051.2 miles per hour around the earth-that is if the earth were not rotating. Because the earth is rotating slightly slower than the moon's orbital speed the moon appears to travel from east to west.

NOTE THE BEARDED ANUNNAKI  GUYS ARE TEXTING WITH THEIR I PHONES WHILE THE DUMB HUMAN IS WORSHIPING THEM... THEY DIDN'T HAVE LAWS BACK THEN LIKE: NO TEXTING WHILE FLYING!... ONE CYLINDER IS BROKEN. They need Bazaliel to fix it. I believe the three cylinder engine was needed to keep it inflated. It may have run on hydrogen. The hydrogen could have been produced with electrolisis using windmills.

































INSIDE A FLYING SAUCER: DOES IT LOOK FAMILIAR?












The evidence is clear that we are being terra-formed.... Most scientists will now tell you Earth had experienced at least six major extinctions. Life had to have been reseeded after each one. Evolution did not produce the incredible diversity of life we have on Earth today. Evolution takes a very long time and does not produce impractical or improbable creatures that serve no real purpose. Earth had to have been reseeded. The present ongoing Alien DNA harvest is probably necessary to reseed the Earth after the next big one.

A higher intelligence would not want to cause and extinction do to the risk of demolishing the planet; and they would be limited to the amount and type of ammunition (moons) on hand. Is it coincidence that the moon's diameter as seen from earth exactly matches the diameter of the sun during an eclipse? Is it coincidence that the moon always shows one side toward earth? If the moon had hit near earth's equator would it have stopped earth's rotation? Is all this further evidence of terra-forming?

The amount of ice on the Moon raised sea levels 300 feet?

This may be about the most astonishing thing you ever heard - A CITY 6,000 FEET UNDER THE SEA! But if you'll be patient with me, there's something else you may be interested in first...
The Swedish research ship "Albatross" had just returned from a peaceful reconnaissance in the South Atlantic.

Had you peeped through a lattice window in a little house outside Stockholm, you might have seen two men, one of them bearded, huddled across a table, engaged in lively talk.
One of them, in fact, looked almost wild-eyed. But, knowing him as a well-balanced, sober man, you would have to admit that whatever it was that now had him so excited must be something extraordinary.

"I swear to you, it's incredible! Do you know, we were sounding the seabed 700 miles east of Brazil. And we brought up core samples of fresh-water plants! Can you believe that! And do you know how deep they were? Three thousand meters!"

The speaker was Professor Hans Pettersson, who had led the expedition.
And he added: "These samples actually contained micro- organisms, twigs, plants and even tree bark."

ANOTHER DISCOVERY
Within a similar time frame, discussion was hot in London. Coral had been recovered from depths of over 3,000 feet (1,000 meters) in mid-Atlantic Ocean sites. Now we all know that coral grows only close to sea level.
So in London, England, someone else was making a chilling diagnosis: "Either the seabed dropped thousands of feet or the sea rose mightily."

AND STILL ANOTHER
Meanwhile, at Columbia University in the U.S.A., Professor Maurice Ewing, a prominent marine geologist, was reporting on an expedition that had descended to submerged plateaus at a depth of 5,000 feet.

"It's quite amazing," he said. "At 5,000 feet down, they discovered prehistoric beach sand. It was brought up in one case from a depth of nearly three and one half miles, far from any place where beaches exist today.

"One deposit was 1,200 miles from the nearest land."
As we all know, sandy beaches form from waves breaking on the edge of the coastal rim of the seas. Beach sand does not form deep down on the ocean bottom.
Then Ewing dropped his bombshell: "Either the land must have sunk 2 or 3 miles or the sea must have been 2 or 3 miles lower than now. Either conclusion is startling."

WHAT THIS MEANS
These facts mean one of two things: either there was a mighty ocean bed subsidence (unexplainable by orthodox science), or a huge (likewise unexplained) addition of water to the ocean.













Note above how the time between Ice Ages decreases as you go back in time. This is an indication that our sun is in orbit around something that imparts additional light and heat. Note also how the Ice Ages are smaller and less severe 700-hundred thousand years back in time. 

Note also that these are Antarctic Ice core samples and Antarctica is much colder than the rest of the world so the temperature does not reflect the actual average global temperatures. For the most part, Antarctica has had ice caps for a very long time.

Let's briefly consider these.

1. Sudden subsidence: Much of the landscape that is now drowned by the ocean still has sharp, fine profiles. But these sharp, fine profiles would have been eroded, and the lava covering the ocean floor would have decayed if all this rocky terrain had been immersed in sea water for more than 15,000 years.
You see, chemical and mechanical forces are very destructive. Sharp edges and points can be ground down and blunted by abrasion, erosion, and the action of waves.
But the entire seabed below the present surf zone has retained its sharpness of profile. Had the subsidence taken place gradually, chemical and other forces would have ground down this sharp profile within a few hundred years.
If the land had sunk slowly, even the surf would have worn away these profiles. No, it was a rapid subsidence, if a subsidence it was.
This sudden collapse of an area covering many millions of square miles does not support a gradual sinking, but rather a cataclysmic event.
Such subsidence is perfectly in keeping with the centuries-long adjustments that occurred after the Great Flood trauma.

2. Pre-Flood sea level lower however, some of the data strongly suggest that the sea level actually was several thousand feet lower than at present - that there was LESS WATER in the ocean at one time. These discoveries suggest that we are uncovering evidence of a former sea level!
But this would call for a relatively sudden increase of 30 percent in the volume of the ocean. The compelling question is, WHERE DID THIS WATER COME FROM? Few geologists can bring themselves to answer this.



Note above that the temperature was much higher in the Vostock Region of Antarctica millions of years ago. Antarctica was still very cold compared to the rest of the globe but average global temperatures were actually over 60 F until about three million years. Suddenly after the Banard's Loop explosion in Orion the average global temperatures suddenly dropped down to around 32 degree F. or zero C and stayed there. 







Obviously, melting ice sheets could never have contained enough water to raise the ocean level thousands of feet. So we can forget melting ice sheets being the cause. Could it have come from the Moon?

CITY ON THE SEABED?
Now for another surprise. This time the excitement was in the Pacific. The year was 1965. A research vessel named "Anton Brunn" was investigating the Nazca Trench, off Peru.
The sonar operator called for the captain.
"I don't know what to make of this," he murmured. "Around here, the ocean floor is all mud bottom. But just take in these sonar recordings... unusual shapes on the ocean floor! I'm puzzled."
"Better lower a camera," came the order.

At a depth of 6,000 feet a photograph revealed huge upright pillars and walls, some of which seemed to have writing on them. In other nearby locations, apparently artificially shaped stones lay on their sides, as though they had toppled over.
The crew rubbed their eyes and kept staring. Could this really be? ...the remains of a city under a mass of water more than a mile deep!
Was it overwhelmed suddenly by some gigantic disaster? And now it was buried under 6,000 feet of ocean.

Another explanation for a city being 6000 feet below the sea: When the Moon was brought in hitting the Arctic Ocean the earth being a liquid ball the impact forced some land masses up while others were submerged. Antarctica, for example has an average height above sea level of 7,500 feet. I don't think it was always that highbecause the ancients mapped the sea coast very accurately. Its average elevation is now over a mile high. That is why is has such a massive ice cap. Antarctica being on the exact opposite side of the Moon impact was pushed up. People were living at Teajunaco which was at sea level. There are boat moorings 13,000 feet above sea level. Lake Titikaka was once part of the atlantic Ocean. There are old sea shells buried in the mud. I know this is all hard to accept but one has to look at the facts. 



RADIATION SHIELDING
Interstellar travel requires massive radiation shielding (not to mention dust and meteor shielding) and it stands to reason that they came here inside a hollow moon or were shielded from cosmic rays and meteorites by a moon. It can't be done any other way by our known science. If it was brought here at on a long journey throught space with a speed of say, 100 kilometers per second aft side would collect methane ice with the side facing the direction of travel the front would take a lot of hits. It would have a tremendous amount of craters much like the back side of the moon today. Negative mascons or large caves on the back of the moon would explain why it orbits with one side always facing toward earth.
All the resources on mars have been stripped. It's as if the populations that lived there took everything and left.
NOTE THAT MARS HAS A THICKER ATMOSPHERE THAN NASA WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE. IT HAS CLOUDS AND STORMS.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Bogus Global Warming

The multinational global climate change meetings are not based on fact. Its all about "societal manipulation" to make you live in a smaller house, drive a smaller car or bicycle, change your diet, reduce your standard of living, control the number of children you will have and reduce world populations so they enslave you more. Al Gore and Bill Clinton made millions selling phoney carbon credits to big corporations. Scientists are being paid to spread this disinformation and I am irate about all the dis-ingenuousness, controlling elite. 

Study shows Alaska got colder from 2000-2010
Published: January 5, 2013 Updated 6 hours ago2013-01-06T19:47:38Z
By MIKE DUNHAMAnchorage_Daily_News

By MIKE DUNHAM — mdunham@adn.com
The overwhelming majority of Alaska is getting colder and has been since 2000, according to a study by researchers with the Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. But the authors stop short of saying the lower temperatures contradict that idea that the earth, and Alaska in particular, is warming. Instead, they conclude that the findings show a temporary variation.
The scientists with the Geophysical Institute's Alaska Climate Research Center looked at temperatures recorded at 20 "first-order meteorological stations" in Alaska from 2000 to 2010. The stations were spread from Annette in Southeast to Barrow on the Arctic Ocean to Cold Bay at the southwest tip of the Alaska Peninsula. All are operated by professional meteorologists with the National Weather Service, use similar or identical equipment and follow uniform operating procedures.
Every station pointed to a cooling trend, except Barrow.
The mean cooling for the average of all 20 stations was 2.34 degrees Fahrenheit. The chilling trend was most pronounced in the Bering Sea region, with King Salmon recording a drop of 4.42 degrees in the first decade of the new century.
The Anchorage average went down by 2.7 degrees over the 10 years, Fairbanks lost about 1.8 degrees and Southeast stations dropped by a degree or less.
The report, produced by a team headed by professor emeritus of geophysics Gerd Wendler, is titled "The First Decade of the New Century: A Cooling Trend for Most of Alaska." It was published in The Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2012.
A map in the report traces a line across the top of Alaska, starting at Point Hope and generally running across the crest of the Brooks Mountain Range to Canada. All portions of the state south of that line recorded colder temperatures and all places north recorded warmer.
The authors looked into sunspot activity and determined that it was not related to the trend. They did find a correlation with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, or PDO, a shift in warm waters from the eastern to the western side of the Pacific Ocean not unlike the El Nino warming pattern. But while El Nino shifts over months, the PDO moves much more slowly, staying put for years or decades.
Wendler has previously taken part in research that showed that a long warming period in Alaska, starting in 1977, was influenced by the PDO.
The PDO affects the ongoing low pressure system -- or "semi-permanent cyclone" -- in the Aleutians. In the present configuration, the PDO is causing the Aleutian Low to weaken. That means decreased wind speeds, resulting in less warm air from south of the Aleutians mixing with colder air in the Bering Sea, which leads to chillier temperatures on the west coast of the state.
The Arctic Ocean coast, far from the Aleutians, is not significantly affected by this phenomenon. Barrow showed an increase of 3.04 degrees over the decade, which the authors called substantial.
The report notes previous cooling periods, including a span of some 30 years that began in the 1940s, and says it is too early to decide whether the widespread Alaska cooling trend "is a climatic shift" or merely a blip. Its summary reads: "The long term observed warming of Alaska of about twice the global value. . . . is sometimes temporarily modified or even reversed by natural decadal variations."
The authors acknowledge, however, that the overall statewide drop of 2.34 degrees is a lot for one decade.
Reach Mike Dunham at mdunham@adn.com or 257-4332.

Read more here: http://www.adn.com/2013/01/05/2743379/study-shows-alaska-got-colder.html#storylink=cpy