LIVE TO AGE 200 AND BEYOND...

The article I recently found recently may be the answer to the chronic diseases we are experiencing in this country.

Twenty-five years ago I wrote a book titled, PHILOSOPHERS STONE. Its about bypassing the plant to take the trace minerals and ORMES out of certain soils that contain a lot of the trace minerals. Soils around the Phoenix Arizona and the Middle East areas used to be covered with an ocean at one time and the sea water evaporated leaving all the minerals and ORMES in the soil. Its the same process that plants use to take minerals out of the soil to grow. You're just bypassing the plant and you don't have to wait several months for your garden to grow. The ancient peoples did it by boiling the dirt in alkaline spring water for six days and then reducing the pH with vinegar. It explains it in the book...  

You can also use the recipes in my book to take the minerals out of Dead Sea salt, sea water, granite powder and especially limestone that was grown in shallow seas by plants. The technology has been around for thousands of years and my book contains some of the history and use of the white-powder-of-gold as as its known today ORMUS or ORMES, (orbitally rearranged monatomic elements). 

My book, Philosophers Stone contains six recipes developed by Pfizer Pharmaceutical. It only cost $15.00 and can be ordered by calling 1-877-buy book, or by going to my web sites: www.GuardDogBooks.com and or www.AlaskaPublishing.com and clicking on the picture of the book.    

Can we live to be 200 but feel and look like 21? This doctor says Yes! Commentary by G. Edward Griffin Some people think Dr. Ed Park is crazy. I guess that makes me crazy, too, because I think he might be right ˗ and, if he is right, I want to be in on it. I met Dr. Park as a result of reading an article on the new science of age reversal. Yes, you read that correctly. I didn't say slowing. I said reversal. Before getting into the story, I must tell you that this report is a bit long. That's because there are so many mind-boggling issues that almost every statement will raise questions, and I would rather try to answer them as we go instead of publishing a shorter version and then having to answer questions by email forevermore. THE QUEST FOR AGE REVERSAL In the last twenty years, there has been a surge of research into the mechanism of cellular aging with the intent of finding ways to reverse the process. This seemingly impossible goal turns out to be less impossible than one might expect when we consider that, in our bodies, there already are cells (called stem cells) that never age. Stem cells have the capacity, not only to replace themselves should they become damaged, but they also are the parent cells that produce all other cells. They can create any type of cell that needs to be repaired or replaced, anything from skin to heart muscle to liver. In the early stages of pregnancy, the most fundamental type of stem cells, called diploid totipotent cells, divide and subdivide to create the entire embryo. They carry within them the entire genetic code for all cells and organs. IMMORTAL CELLS There is reason to believe that stem cells can live indefinitely. In one experiment, cultures of these cells, which are nourished in a laboratory petri dish, are still alive after seventy years with no signs of aging. Scientists refer to these as immortal cells. Most of our cells, although produced from stem cells, are not stem cells themselves and, therefore, are subject to aging. When muscles, nerves, and vital organs finally wear out, stem cells die also, not because they have grown old, but because they are no longer nourished by the rest of the body. Normal cells wear out and replace themselves, on average, about every seven years. In the early stages of life, their replicas are nearly identical to the originals but, with the passage of time, the replicas become less vigorous and acquire flaws. Hair turns grey or falls out, skin becomes wrinkled, muscles atrophy, and organs lose efficiency. It's called aging. CHROMOSOMES, DNA, AND TELOMERESTo understand why this occurs, we must know that all cells hold strands ofDNA that provide biological instructions for the cell's function. At the tips of chromosomes are small structures, like plastic caps at the ends of shoelaces, that protect them from unraveling and fusing with other chromosomes. These protective structures are called telomeres. Every time a normal cell replicates itself, the new cell is a complete copy of the old one ˗ with one exception: The telomeres in the new cells are slightly shorter than in the previous version. There are only so many times cells can replace themselves before telomeres become so short they can no longer protect the chromosomes. When that happens, chromosomes begin to deteriorate, make imperfect copies, and eventually fail to replicate. It is as though there is a built-in expiration date, and many have assumed that there is nothing we can do about it. When you're out of telomeres, your time is up. WHY DO STEM CELLS GROW TELOMERES BUT OTHER CELLS DON'T? The quest, therefore, has been to discover what it is about stem cells that allows them to keep their long telomeres regardless of how many times they replace themselves. Could that process be made to happen also in normal cells and, if so, would they, too, become immortal? The first part of that question was answered in 2009 when the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Elizabeth Blackburn, Carol Greider, and Jack Szostak for their discovery of the mechanism by which cells make copies of themselves. (See Nobel Prize press release here.) They demonstrated that telomere growth is stimulated by an enzyme called telomerase, and that the reason stem cells preserve their telomere length indefinitely is that they produce this enzyme, but normal cells do not. Finally, the mechanism was understood. The next task was to put telomerase into normal cells to see if they, too, will re-grow telomeres and become immortal. The challenge was how to get telomerase into normal cells. THE SOLUTION WAS FOUND IN NATURE Actually, the solution was already known. In 2007, the research team at Sierra Sciences, under the direction of Dr. Bill Andrews, succeeded in isolating a single molecule from the root of an herbal plant called Atragalus Membranaceus (also known as Astragalus Propinquus) that eliminates the need to deliver telomerase throughout the body, because it activates normal cells to produce their own telomerase on the spot. In other words, it causes normal cells to mimic stem cells in this regard. Amazing! A telomerase activator was found in nature. PROOF OF CONCEPT So, does it actually work according to theory? The evidence so far is impressive. In his book, Curing Aging*, doctor Andrews described the following studies: ► In 1990, scientists at the Geron Corporation found that adding telomerase to human cells "produced a line of cells that was able to divide indefinitely... [and] did not show any signs of losing growth control." (p. 49) ► "In 1999, researchers at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute ... produced mice with telomeres short enough to show many of the classic hallmarks of human aging: graying hair, frailness, spontaneous malignancies, and a reduced capacity for wound healing. This indicated clearly that these classic symptoms of aging are the result of telomere shortening in humans, and that our 'natural aging process' had its roots in short telomeres." (pp. 49, 50) ► "In 2000, Geron Corporation ... cultured human skin cells... so their telomeres would be as short as those of the elderly. ... As expected, the skin showed the hallmarks of 'old' skin, such as fragility and subepidermal blistering. It looked, to the naked eye, like the skin of an elderly person. The team then added the telomerase gene to a second batch of the old skin cells. ... The telomerized skin visually resembled young skin and it also shared the same gene expression profile as the young skin. By all available measurements, telomerizing the skin had actually reversed the aging of the skin itself." (p. 50.) ► "In 2003, a team at the University of Utah ... found that the mortality rate of individuals with shorter telomeres was nearly twice as high as those with longer telomeres, and that mortality as a result of heart disease was over three times higher in individuals with shorter telomeres. This provided solid evidence of a correlation between telomere shortening and death from old age or age-related diseases in humans." (pp. 51, 52) ► In November 2010, a team of scientists at Harvard Medical School altered the telomerase gene in a group of mice so that telomeres became short enough to display human-like symptoms of aging. Then they activated the production of telomerase within their cells. "This treatment successfully decreased the abundance of cells with critically short telomeres in these mice and caused a 33% increase in telomere length. More significantly, it allowed resumption of cell proliferation and eliminated the symptoms of degeneration across multiple organs, including the testes, spleens, and intestines. The mice experienced a restoration of fertility, of spleen size, of sense of smell, and of brain size and function. These were results that, if seen in elderly humans, would constitute successful reversal of the aging process." (pp. 52, 53) LIFE EXTENSION MAGAZINE WEIGHS IN The following summary of the Harvard study was published in the April, 2011, edition of Life Extension Magazine: After only 30 days, there was a reversal of the degenerative changes in every system the researchers tested. The brains of the treated mice, not only started growing new neurons, but began to thicken the protective myelin sheath surrounding existing neurons. As one of the researches was quoted, they were able to "reverse neurodegeneration." The treated mice produced new viable sperm, their spleen atrophy and intestinal damage were reversed, and even their sense of smell was restored (indicating restored olfactory function in their brains). ... In humans, this would be like restoring the health and vigor of a sickly 80-year-old to that of a young adult! Incidentally, there is a blood test for measuring telomere length, and it has been shown conclusively that patients who undertake telomerase activation therapy, experience a significant increase in the length of their telomeres BUT DOES IT WORK WITH HUMANS? Very impressive, indeed, but forget petri dishes, mouse studies, and blood tests. Does telomerase activation extend the lifespan of humans? The answer is that it is too soon to know for sure. It has been theorized that users might grow one day younger for each day of use. It could take ten years to knock off ten years from one's biological age, and it probably will take that long to know for sure if longer telomeres really equate to longer human lifespan. In the meantime, users report deeper sleep with vivid dreams, better energy and stamina, elevated mood, and mental clarity. Those who have been users for more than a few months often report improvement in skin color, reduction in wrinkles, fading of age spots, and darkening of hair. Bear in mind, however, that these are anecdotal reports. There have been no controlled studies so far. In fact, there may never be any, because this comes from nature and cannot be patented. Manufacturers will not spend millions of dollars for controlled studies when competitors can benefit without bearing any of the cost. It may take years before the empirical evidence will tell us for sure if human age reversal is really happening. CAN ONLY THE SUPER WEALTHY AFFORD THIS? The telomerase-activator was developed by Geron Corporation and branded as TA65. It became available in 2005 for those with deep pockets. In the beginning, a year's supply cost $25,000 plus travel to New York. Since then, the price has fallen dramatically, but is still beyond the reach of most people. Currently, a 90-capsule bottle of TA65 sells for $500. But do not despair. A chemical analysis by The American Analytical Chemistry Laboratories in Champaign, IL, showed that more than 95% of TA65 is Cyloastragenol, which is the technical name for the unique molecule found to be the telomerase activator. Since then, other producers have entered the market with what they claim is the generic form of TA65 at lower cost. But here is where the plot thickens. At this early phase of development, there is considerable confusion regarding the quality, purity, and even the identity of what is in these brands. The lowest Internet price is attached to a product made in China, and there is some question about what really is in the bottle. Health food stores sell various brands of Astragalus, the herb from which Cycloastagenol is taken, but that is not even close to the substance that activates telomerase. It is merely the ground up root. Some products claim they contain Astragalus extracts, some as high as 25:1 concentration, but that still is not Cycloastragenol. I am told that it would take bushels of these herbal products to produce thirty tablets of the real thing. ENTER, DR. PARK Which brings us back to Dr. Park. When I decided to try TA65, I searched the Internet for a reliable source and found that, not only was he one of those first users I mentioned previously, but he was the first medical doctor to use telomerase activation in his practice, so I purchased my first supply from him and, soon thereafter, met him in person. Ed Park, MD, is an expert on telomerase activation. In 1989, he graduated from Harvard University with a BA degree in Biological Anthropology. In 1993, he received his MD degree from Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, and a Master's degree in Public Health also from Columbia. In 1997, he completed internship and residency at Beth Israel Hospital, a teaching hospital of the Harvard Medical School. He is the author of Telomere Timebombs,** and his private practice is located in Costa Mesa, California. MY INTERVIEW WITH DR. PARK To provide further information about this topic, we produced a video interview with Dr. Park entitled The New Science of Age Reversal. The 40-minute DVD is sold at The Reality Zone here, but we also made a shorter version just for this announcement. It can be viewed for free here. I was delighted to learn that Dr. Park, building on what he has learned about anti-aging, has crafted his own nutriceutical, called Recharge, and that the price is significantly lower. Because of his knowledge in this field, I have confidence in the quality of his product, so I decided to tell everyone about it and add it to our online store. The price is still quite steep but it keeps coming down and, as the user base grows, that trend surely will continue. WAIT AND SEE ˗ OR TAKE THE PLUNGE? To be on the frugal and cautious side, it makes sense to wait a few years for the price to drop further and to see if users really experience unmistakable age reversal. However, if you are like I am, you may decide that waiting is too expensive in terms of continued aging and lost opportunity to beat the clock. Will this really work? Frankly, I don't know, but the science is sound, and I think it could. For my part, I would hate to find out that it does but I missed the boat. * Bill Andrews, PhD, Curing Aging (Reno, Nevada, Sierra Sciences: 2014) ** Ed Park, MD, Telomere Timebombs; Defusing the Terror of Aging (Costa Mesa, California, Telomere Timebombs Publishing: 2013) ******* The label recommends taking 1 to 5 capsules daily, preferably at bedtime, along with a fatty bedtime snack or after a fatty evening meal. Cellular regeneration is more active during sleep, and fats improve absorption. FREE BONUS WITH AUTO-SHIP A free DVD of The New Science of Age Reversal, the full interview of Dr. Park by G. Edward Griffin, will be sent to those who select the auto-ship option. Recharge HP03T_single_bottle_30capsules$129.00

		HP03T_per_bottle_if_order_2_or_more$109.00

		AUTOSHIP: The quantity you enter for your initial order will be sent immediately. After that, the same quantity will be shipped to arrive at approximately the same time of the month that you received your first shipment. If you would like an autoship quantity different from the initial order or if you want it to arrive at a different time of the month, please specify in the comment section of the order form. HP03T_per_bottle_if_autoship_any_quantiy$97.00

If the 2-or-more quantity price is selected but only one bottle is ordered, the single-bottle price will apply even though the discount appears in the shopping cart. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Does Cycloastragenol cause cancer?  The cancer question was a theoretical concern in the beginning, because one of the characteristics of cancer cells is that they produce telomerase, and it was theorized that anything that activates the production of telomerase might, thereby, cause normal cells to become cancer. Now that the product has been used for almost ten years, that speculation has been disproved. There are no reports of cancer occurring or being aggravated by Cycloastragenol. In fact, just the opposite has been the case. Cancers have gone into remission after taking Cycloastragenol. Studies have shown that those with longer telomeres are much less likely to develop cancer than those with short telomeres, and some researchers now are viewing telomerase activators, not only as agents for age reversal but also for cancer therapy. The following references on this topic are recommended: Curing Aging, by Bill Andrews, Ph.D., pp. 58-63. Telomere Timebombs, by Ed Park, M.D., pp. 78, 164. Is there any toxicity associated with Cycloastragenol?  Since products found in nature cannot be patented, there is no motivation for companies to spend the millions of dollars required to conduct FDA-approved tests for toxicity, because their competitors then could ride on the back of their research without contributing to its cost. So, there have been no definitive tests that deal with this question. However, after more than ten years of actual use by thousands of individuals, many of whom are in the medical profession, there have been no reports of toxicity or any other negative side effects. The worst complaint I have seen after scouring the literature is that, in some cases, people occasionally wake up in the middle of the night, fully alert, ready to start the day, but then have no trouble going back to sleep again. That's it. Cycloastagenol appears to be about as non-toxic as anything can be. Nevertheless, it is just common sense not to exceed recommended dosage levels and to be alert to negative reactions, including those related to allergies. What are the ingredients in Recharge? Because the manufacturers of TA65 were the first to use Cycloastragenol for telomerase activation, they have taken the stance that this gives them an exclusive right to use those words. Therefore, Dr. Park has informed us he is concerned about legal action if he says that Recharge contains Cycloastragenol or that it works as a telomerase activator. Nevertheless, laboratory tests confirm that the primary ingredient is, indeed, Cycloastragenol (8mg, which is the same as in TA65). The Recharge label refers to this as Astragalus propinquus extract. Technically, that is correct, but Cycloastragenol is a very small (and very expensive) component ofAstragalus propinquus extract. Usually, the word extract refers only to a distillate of the source material (the root of the Astragalus plant) that is not even close to the high potency of pure Cycloastragenol. Dr. Park hopes to overcome this barrier eventually but, at present, there is a legal issue regarding what he can put on the label. He now takes Recharge instead of TA65, and so do I. At present, the label provides the following information:Astragalus propinquus extract, 8 mg.Curcuma longa extract, 34 mg. Ocimumtenuflorum, 21 mg. Rhodiola rosea, 13 mg. Is there any reason for young people to take a telomerase activator? There are two reasons for taking a telomerase activator. The one that has received the most publicity is to achieve age reversal. Those under the age of thirty or thirty-five may not be motivated by that purpose. The other reason is to increase resistance to chronic and communicable diseases. There is a proven correlation between telomere length and good health, even at younger ages. Would I have to take this product for the rest of my life? The process of telomere shortening and re-growing is a slow process. It takes many years to age, and it probably will take the same number to un-age. Having to consume the product for the rest of one's life begs the question of how long that life is. If you want to live for 200 years in good health,  you would be well advised to take this substance for as long as you want the effects it brings. However, if you decide that you have had enough of life and good health, you could simply stop taking it. Theoretically, that would put you back on the original track of telomere shortening and the gradual advance of old age. So the short answer is: No, you don't have to. Would it be dangerous to take this product for a while and then stop? I have no idea if this process could be turned on, then off, and then on again. Theoretically, it could, and I cannot think of any reason that doing so would be dangerous, but only time will tell. Is this product enough by itself for good health? Absolutely not. Young people become ill even with long telomeres. The body needs a wide spectrum of nutrients, micronutrients, nutritional co-factors, and clean air and water. Even fresh fruits and vegetables may not be enough, because most of them come from mineral-depleted soil, are soaked with toxic pesticides, or have been genetically modified. Don't abandon high quality supplements, exercise, and healthy lifestyle. Long telomeres are not enough.

Cosmological Ice Ages.

MOON DEPOSITS FROZEN METHANE?

Scientists would like to have everything fit into neat little packages so they say that all the planets in our solar system were all formed at the same time when the sun was formed. So far everything astronomers have looked at in our solar system is different from everything else. Everything looks like it was brought in from some other system. Obviously planet swapping is a common thing. The scientific paradigm is being broken every day. This latest moon theory of mine will put me in the loony bin for sure. Pun intended! ☺The real funny part is that my friend, Brad Guth and several other people who I have showed the data to agree with me.

After studying the May 2006 issue of National Geographic ® map some more the question came to mind:
"How did all that frozen methane get down there under the earth's crust?" "How did the frozen methane get buried under the ocean floors all over the world?" There is no way methane could freeze and stay frozen on the earth's surface. How can it remain frozen when it is buried deep in the earth's crust where it is supposed to be hot? It had to be brought in from some place else. It has been noted that some of the moons in our solar system are covered with a thick layer of methane ice.

Europa orbits Jupiter once in exactly the same amount of time that it takes to complete one rotation and therefore keeps a single face toward the planet at all times. Does this sound like our moon? It is estimated that Europa is covered with a 100 kilometer deep ocean of slushy ice. The moon's orbit is not a completely smooth ellipse because Europa is pulled by the gravity as it passes by the nearby moons Ganymede and Io, other moons around Jupiter. Gravitational forces flex the interior thus keeping it warm.

Pictures taken by the Galileo Orbiter indicate that geysers erupt along the cracks in the ice suggesting that Europa has an ocean of water underneath and scientists think that Europa may actually harbor life in its' deep ocean. The spacecraft's magnetometer recorded regular changes in the direction of Europa's magnetic field that correspond to fluctuations in Jupiter's magnetic field according to it position. This suggests that Europa has an underlying material that conducts electricity, such as a salty ocean! There is more than one salty moon in our solar system and where did they come from? Given the aforementioned data there is a good chance that our moon may have had a salty ocean before it collided with earth and since our moon is bigger than Europa it could have had a thicker coating of ice-in the neighborhood of 200 kilometers.

ICE ON OTHER PLANETS AND MOONS
There are ice rings around the planet Saturn. There are also ice rings around Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune. The asteroid Vesta, is the brightest. It is so shiny that it must be covered with ice. Saturn and Uranus also have icy satellites. Comets, like Halley's Comet, have very long and elliptical orbits. Nereid, one of Neptune's moons, has a very elliptical orbit.

Saturn's moon, Enceladus that is 310 miles in diameter erupts plums of water vapor and ice particles that smooth its surface and replenishes the E-ring. Thethys, Dione, and Rhea also have thick coatings of ice. Titan which is much larger than Mercury may have a rocky core, possibly surrounded by a "mantel" and "crust." In other words, is may exhibit a structure similar to that of Earth. It has a dense atmosphere, weather erosion, and pools of liquid methane. In fact, it is the only known planetary satellite with a dense atmosphere-possibly denser that that of Earth. -[Science from New Worlds, NASA CORE Central Operation of Resources for Educators slide program and script.]

Our moon's mass is 7.35E22 kg and is about 384,000 km from the earth. These figures were from http://www.seds.org/billa/tnp/datamax.html.

FROZEN METHANE IS NOT FROM THIS PLANET
The only way to make frozen methane on a small planet or moon is to create a strong methane and water atmosphere using anaerobic microorganisms. Then put that planet out into the vast cold of space so the atmosphere freezes into ice. If someone has a better solution we would like to hear it.
My French, Scientist and Chemist friend, Jean Linares writes, "I have read attentively your very interesting document about where the moon came from. I share with you the fact that the frozen methane is not from this planet and your explanation about the probable process (a combination of helium-4 with carbon during the gigantic impacts of the icy moon is correct-by transmutation of chemical elements (Kervran Effect)."

A PLANETARY CRIME
Our moon came in at a low angle to earth of ten to twenty degrees, looking much like Europa; a ball of rock 2160 miles in diameter covered with a layer of frozen methane and saltwater 150 kilometers deep, with a thick methane atmosphere of its own. At this point in time the earth's atmosphere was somewhat thicker. Brad Guth found a mention that early earth billions of years ago had an atmospheric pressure of 50 bars, which is 725 pounds per square inch. We mention early on in this book that scientists measured the chest cavities of dinosaurs to discover that they could not exist in today's atmosphere because their lung capacity was too small for their body mass. It was then postulated that the atmospheric pressure had to have been around thirty pounds per square inch at the time of the dinosaurs 140 to 160-million years ago. After reviewing the ancient atmospheric pressure figures it become apparent that earth is loosing its atmosphere.
As our icy moon came into the thick atmosphere of earth the moon's ice covering would have cushioned the blow. The polar icecap on earth would also have had some cushioning effect. The heat from atmospheric friction pealed off massive chunks of ice the size of West Virginia, Rhode Island and New York striking the earth creating the long chain of lakes as it traveled northwest into Canada. Giant "spaceburgs" of methane and water fell off the moon making Lake Superior, Lake Winnipeg, Lake Churchill, Lake Athabasca, Great Slave Lake and Great Bear Lake. These huge lakes were laid down in a slightly curved line to the southeast due to the moon's parabolic ascent into orbit. This curve is more evidence that they were made by falling spaceburgs because the angel of climb lessened as it departed earth. All the lakes are irregular in shape with sharp edges as if made by large chunks of ice. If they were made by glaciers the corners would be rounded. Shards of methane and water ice dropped at low altitude made these lakes.

There is some glacier material laying on the surface but this may have been deposited by ice ages that covered the northern hemisphere at a later date. We need to determine the depth of these lakes and compare them with each other to see if they were formed in the same way. If they are the approximately the same depth to width ratio then there is a good possibility they were formed the same way and there may even be frozen methane underneath.

If the chain of lakes extending from the Arctic Ocean to the Great Lakes is a result of the southern extent of the polar ice cap as most geologists say and not the result of falling ice then one can determine where the north rotational pole was during the ice age by placing a drawing compass on a globe. You open the compass up to the point where the radius of the compass matched the curve of the lakes and place the other end on the globe. The north rotational pole was 23.5 degrees further south placing it very near Iceland. By tilting the Earth it doubled the amount of grazing land and increased the productivity of the world's oceans by 100 %.

Please review copy of map with North Pole on the coast of Greenland east of Iceland. If you subtract 23.5 degrees inclination from 90 degrees present position of the pole it comes out to where the old rotational pole of the earth was near the Arctic Circle west of Iceland on the Greenland coast. I wanted to know where the rotational pole was before the moon hit so I took child's circle maker-compass and lined up the circle with the radius of the Great Lakes, Great Bear Lake and Lake Victoria which geologists say was the southern extent of the ice sheet during the last ice age. If you put the center of the circle maker west of Iceland at 23.5 south and continue round it pretty much matches the southern extent of the ice during the last ice age in Europe as well.
.
Several years after I wrote the book more data came out about the southern extent of the ice during the last Ice Age. The ice cap extended south as far as Georgia and northern Florida but the California coast redwood trees were spared. The high altitude mountain ranges were covered with glaciers but the coastal areas of Alaska and interior were open grass land. Small salmon runs spawn at the mouth of rivers. I have stone tools and chisels that were made by giant humans that lived  at the mouth of these small streams during the last Ice Age. In one area there is a stone house with a stone table and stone chairs. The chairs are much to big for modern humans to sit in because your legs wouldn't touch the floor. Sea levels were 300-feet lower at the time so it would be possible for people to walk the coastline from Russia to the Americas.

The vacuum behind the moon as it came in must have exceeded 800 mile per hour ripping up many thousands of square miles of forests. Any tribes of hunter-gatherers living in the area were buried alive along with tons of trees and other debris. The Navajo and Sioux tribes in the southwest who were in a position to observe and understand what was happening to them went underground to avoid the catastrophe. Tribal legends speak of living underground for a very long time and coming back to the surface when the cataclysm was over. Five and a half thousand years passed before the first archaeological records show human habitation on Kodiak Island in Alaska.

After our moon plunged into the Arctic Ocean (creating the Arctic Ocean) there was total chaos for several thousand years such as extreme earthquakes and volcanism all over the earth. Vast herds of animals were picked up by the wind and dumped in heaps while others were flash-frozen with green leaves still in their mouths while looking up to the sky. They actually found quick frozen mamoths with buttercup flowers in their mouths.

While building the Alcan Highway to Alaska, construction workers found flash-frozen mammoths buried standing up with green food still in their stomachs. Recently I have had this verified first hand by oil workers digging on the North Slope who had dug up similar finds. Several native Alaskans from northern Alaska told me personally of finding musk ox, bison and mammoths found flash-frozen standing up and looking up in the sky with green food still in their mouths. Another well-documented story in books about the building of the Alcan Highway to Alaska tells about road crews discovering frozen meat buried in permafrost for thousands of years. The camp cook served up some of the 12,000-year-old quick-frozen, mammoth meat.
After the Moon hit the earth was suddenly plunged into darkness lasting several hundred years while dirty snow began a new mini ice age that lasted two-thousand years. A meteorite (possibly ice from the Moon) fell into the south Atlantic about the same time threw whales up into the mountains of New York State and the Carolina s  I believe this event happened about the same time as when the mastodons and other animals were quick-frozen in northern Canada and Alaska.

This is planetary forensics. Where did the bullet go? There was an old mystery book where a person was murdered and they couldn't prosecute the killer because they couldn't find the bullet. It turned out that the bullet was made of ice and had simply melted. In this case the bullet could have been frozen methane.

When the moon hit earth with a force of 650-tera-mega-tons it compressed the Arctic Ocean flattening the crust of the earth at the pole to a depth of 5 kilometers. The sea floor bounced back up to 3 kilometers and filled in with sediment to an average depth of 1.3 kilometers. Hydrographic maps of the Arctic Ocean confirm these depths with the deepest measured at 5 kilometers. The impact knocked earth's rotational pole 23.5 degrees from the middle of the continent of Greenland to its present position in relation to the sun giving earth summer and winter seasons. Before the moon hit the earth there were only small seasons due to Earths elliptical orbit around the sun.

MOON RESPONSIBLE FOR EQUATORIAL BULGE
The moon's collision at the pole may have created the earth's equatorial bulge. Impact craters are usually ten times the diameter of the meteor but when you slow an object down it doesn't hold true. When you have two atmospheres acting as buffers plus (by Brad's shallow, moon-meteor-crater calculations) 253 kilometers of ice to cushion the blow it would have depressed the crust of the earth to a depth of 5.3 kilometers. Our moon would have had to come in at a low angel and bounced off at the 27,000 miles-hour, escape velocity (possibly much less due to its large mass) in order to go in orbit around earth.

The minimum distance it would have to bounce out into space to still remain in orbit would be the geosynchronous orbit point of 28,000 miles. This is the point above the earth where a satellite will remain over one place on earth because its orbit speed matching the rotational speed of the earth. Remaining in the geosynchronous orbit wouldn't help keep earth warm nor would it create tides to oxygenate the oceans so its impact speed had to have exceeded escape velocity.

After the impact there would have been helices tides thousands of feet high as the moon made several highly elliptical orbits around earth. It eventually settled into its present orbit with one side facing earth. Noah would have had one heck of a wild ride...

Where it impacted the North Slope it drove tons of methane ice underground and chemically altered the existing oil strata and squeezed it into pockets. The water brought in was enough to raise sea levels more than 300 feet. I say this because archeologists looking for human habitation that existed before 13,000 years ago are finding ancient beaches and artifacts at that level. Most of the earth was made uninhabitable for three thousand years. It would have been a rough time for any life to exist on earth because the volcanism and resultant atmospheric dust pumped into the stratosphere would have blotted out the sun for a long time.
I call on my readers to find the fingerprint on the moon. There should be a negative replica of the undersea ridges of the Arctic Ocean imprinted on the moon someplace. Take a polar projection relief map of the ocean bottom, make a negative of it and make it the same scale as your map of the moon and compare the fingerprint. The deepest part of the Arctic Ocean is the Canadian Basin just north of the Brooks Range. Going northwest it shallows up considerably to what they call the Northwind Escarpment and the Chukchi Plateau. Another 500 miles north is the Mendeleyev Plain and the Mendeleyev Ridge then the Pole Plain. Heading South toward Russia is the Lomosov Ridge. Brad Guth recently found a large crater on the bottom of the moon that fits the profile.

How much DNA did the moon drop off on earth? Given the volume of ice and water there is a very good chance that it dropped off quite a bit. Life coming in from space was first envisioned by the theory of Transthermia where scientists theorize that many forms of life including the common cold viruses are brought in from space.

In 2001 a meteorite exploded above India depositing an estimated 50 tons of material on earth. It rained red material over a small area which appeared to be growing. Scientists gathered up quite a bit of this material and put it in culture mediums. It grew and appeared to be alive but it has no DNA. They still have the material. Could it be some kind of chemical life form?

How many whales and porpoise and carp did the moon drop off? There could have been a whole plethora of DNA seeded to earth at this time. How many sturgeon, trout, cod and northern pike were released into our ecosystem?

Currently there is enough water on earth to cover the surface to an average depth of 8000 feet-that is if the earth were perfect sphere. Some of the water on our planet could have come from our moon during that collision.

If there was 163 kilometers of ice on our moon before it collided with earth it would have brought in 1/4 of our water. It would be Kevin Costner's Water World © for sure. I think a good portion of the ice was frozen methane. If we knew the water-ice methane ratio on Europa then we might get a better handle on the math.

One side of the Moon is all beat to Hell with meteorites while the side facing us is relatively smooth. The giant maria have very few meteor creators. What protected them from meteor impacts? Were they covered with ice sheets 13,000 years ago. Why is their color so dark? Is it possible that the darkness is salt residu? What causes the thousand-mile-long rills?

The area of a sphere is 4pi radius squared. The radius of earth is 3962 miles to its area works out to 197-million square miles. The Moon's radius is 1080 miles and its surface area is 14, 657, 724 square miles. The earth has 13.457 times more surface area than the moon. If you took the 88-mile thick ice on the moon and spread it over the earth it would cover the earth with a 6.5-mile-thick coating of ice. The moon could very well have brought half the water into earth and then some but a good portion of the ice was frozen methane. After it hit about 10 percent of the methane was trapped underground on earth. This then would agree with what we are seeing on earth today. Some of the water may have been lost into space when the moon came in and more when it departed. Some of the methane and water is still stored in vast underground oceans here on earth and some was created by the meteor impact.

According to the managers of the major, oil companies here in Alaska there is 37 trillion cubic feet of gas on the North Slope and another 14 trillion cubic feet yet to be discovered. Most oil fields are ancient meteor impact zones. It takes a little more oomph to united the hydrogen in deep underground water reserviors with the carbon to make hydrocarbons. However some oil is created when limestone plates are being subducted along the ring of fire. The oil perculates up into pools near the surface like in the Los Angeles Basin.

Our moon theory opens up a new Pandora's Box of questions such as: "When did this happen?" and "Was this the event that occurred 12,718 years ago that instantly froze wooly mammoths in the standing position with green food still in their mouths?" When I mentioned this theory to Brad he got so excited that you could hear the enthusiasm in his voice over the phone. He instantly started measuring the radius of the Brooks Range to compute the size of the object to see if it would compare with our moon. The reason there are no moons around the inner planets is because friction from the solar wind slows them down to where they impact their planets or go off into the sun.

Apparently there are many kinds of icy moons out there. Europa is slightly smaller than our moon with a layer of ice 100 kilometers thick. Sedna, a newly-discovered planet in our Kuppier belt beyond Pluto, has a density of two grams per cubic centimeter. It is also slightly smaller than our moon and is red in color due to iron oxides. It is believed to be covered with a layer of ice. It can be detected by amateur astronomers with good backyard telescopes because its precise location is known.

We used an interactive, impact calculator to calculate the force of meteorite impacts. www.Arizona.edu/impacteffects
You simply put in the size of the earth 5.98 E 24 the mass of the moon 8.5E 22 along with the angel of 11 degrees and a velocity of 2 kilometers per second which is the minimum we figured to get the moon back into orbit.. FYI: all these figures including the mass of the Sun, Moon and stars are available by Google search. Please look these things up yoursel and do the math to see if we are correct.

With an incoming velocity of 2 kilometers per second, which is slightly more than the moons current speed coming in at a ten degree angel it would release a force of 600 to 650 terra megatons of energy. The size of the crater would be 1170 miles in diameter or about 1800 kilometers. The depth of the crater would be 5 kilometers and bounce back up to 2.86 kilometers. The average depth of the Arctic Ocean is 1.3 kilometers however it is considerably deeper north of Prudo Bay-up to five kilometers. Additionally it is about 1800 kilometers across!

The above figures are based on the moon being solid rock and not methane and water. The web site has formulas for water impacts but it takes some rearranging of the internal navigation. The figures are also based on today's atmosphere being 14.5 pounds per square inch instead of a more realistic 25 pounds per square inch. Such conditions would slow the incoming moon down considerably. Normally, meteorites within our solar system come in at velocities between fifty thousand to one hundred thousand miles per hour. The moon's current orbital speed is 19,051 miles per hour. Given an original velocity of 70,000 miles per hour and mitigating circumstances of a thick layer of ice, a thicker layer of atmosphere and the amount of salt in the seas, plus a salty lunar atmosphere our lunar impact theory appears to be a strong possibility.
Brad Guth thinks my figures are off and is insistent that the moon came in at a lower entry angle with a speed of only two kilometers per second. He says it lost very little of its initial speed after the impact due to its large mass and the fact that large masses are harder to slow down. It's the "Q-ball effect." Brad's moon figures would have caused less devastation to earth's ecosystem and I have to admit he could be right.

Tiauanaco was at sea level was pushed up 13,000 feet and the earthquake resistant stone strucures held together with bronze pins was left in ruins.

People were living at the advanced city complex or Tiawanaku (Tiahuanaco, Tihunacu) and Puma Punku 15,000 years ago. This was one giant city complex at one time but was put up to the 13,000 foot level by some giant cataclysm. I now believe it was the Moon impacting the Earth that depressed the Earth's crust at the North Pole 5-kilometers that raised up the entire Continent of Antarctica several thousand feet along with parts of South America.

We can't cut such perfect stone blocks used in the construction and made of diorite, a substance as hard as granite. Perfectly strait saw cuts 1/8-inch wide and small holes were drilled through this very hard stone... Obviously they were more advanced than we are today. Dr. Robert M. Shoch places the time of this sudden rise in elevation at 9600 BCE. This agrees with Antarctic ice core data analyzed by two Norwegians as to when Earth came out of the last Ice Age and it also agrees with my estimation of when the Moon was brought into orbit around Earth 12.718 years ago. So we are off by 118 years. The calendars are probably off by that much.

If we had access to information about how long ice will last in the vacuum of space we might be able to tie up a few of the loose ends but there is absolutely no data available. You would think that since water and ice means everything to humanity they would do something about getting data on this subject but no! NASA has no information about ice in space. No experiments were ever done and no experiments are planned. No funding, no research, no nothing. Wouldn't it be interesting to see what would happen to an ice cube on the moon? It's a good thing they didn't do the ice cube experiment because it would probably explode killing one of the astronauts. An ice cube put in a near total vacuum and subjected to extreme radiation would instantly turn to steam. Never once has anyone put an ice cube in space so we are completely in the dark. We need to know how long a cubic meter of ice will last in space. All the science about icy moons and comets is meaningless because all they can do is guess and they are putting the guesses in NASA's Koran as absolute.
After the collision the moon would have had enough speed left over to go back into orbit (escape velocity is 11.2 kilometers per second). Currently the moon is receding from earth a little over one inch per year and traveling at a speed of 980 kilometers per second or 19,051.2 miles per hour around the earth-that is if the earth were not rotating. Because the earth is rotating slightly slower than the moon's orbital speed the moon appears to travel from east to west.

NOTE THE BEARDED ANUNNAKI  GUYS ARE TEXTING WITH THEIR I PHONES WHILE THE DUMB HUMAN IS WORSHIPING THEM... THEY DIDN'T HAVE LAWS BACK THEN LIKE: NO TEXTING WHILE FLYING!... ONE CYLINDER IS BROKEN. They need Bazaliel to fix it. I believe the three cylinder engine was needed to keep it inflated. It may have run on hydrogen. The hydrogen could have been produced with electrolisis using windmills.

INSIDE A FLYING SAUCER: DOES IT LOOK FAMILIAR?

The evidence is clear that we are being terra-formed.... Most scientists will now tell you Earth had experienced at least six major extinctions. Life had to have been reseeded after each one. Evolution did not produce the incredible diversity of life we have on Earth today. Evolution takes a very long time and does not produce impractical or improbable creatures that serve no real purpose. Earth had to have been reseeded. The present ongoing Alien DNA harvest is probably necessary to reseed the Earth after the next big one.

A higher intelligence would not want to cause and extinction do to the risk of demolishing the planet; and they would be limited to the amount and type of ammunition (moons) on hand. Is it coincidence that the moon's diameter as seen from earth exactly matches the diameter of the sun during an eclipse? Is it coincidence that the moon always shows one side toward earth? If the moon had hit near earth's equator would it have stopped earth's rotation? Is all this further evidence of terra-forming?

The amount of ice on the Moon raised sea levels 300 feet?

This may be about the most astonishing thing you ever heard - A CITY 6,000 FEET UNDER THE SEA! But if you'll be patient with me, there's something else you may be interested in first...
The Swedish research ship "Albatross" had just returned from a peaceful reconnaissance in the South Atlantic.

Had you peeped through a lattice window in a little house outside Stockholm, you might have seen two men, one of them bearded, huddled across a table, engaged in lively talk.
One of them, in fact, looked almost wild-eyed. But, knowing him as a well-balanced, sober man, you would have to admit that whatever it was that now had him so excited must be something extraordinary.

"I swear to you, it's incredible! Do you know, we were sounding the seabed 700 miles east of Brazil. And we brought up core samples of fresh-water plants! Can you believe that! And do you know how deep they were? Three thousand meters!"

The speaker was Professor Hans Pettersson, who had led the expedition.
And he added: "These samples actually contained micro- organisms, twigs, plants and even tree bark."

ANOTHER DISCOVERY
Within a similar time frame, discussion was hot in London. Coral had been recovered from depths of over 3,000 feet (1,000 meters) in mid-Atlantic Ocean sites. Now we all know that coral grows only close to sea level.
So in London, England, someone else was making a chilling diagnosis: "Either the seabed dropped thousands of feet or the sea rose mightily."

AND STILL ANOTHER
Meanwhile, at Columbia University in the U.S.A., Professor Maurice Ewing, a prominent marine geologist, was reporting on an expedition that had descended to submerged plateaus at a depth of 5,000 feet.

"It's quite amazing," he said. "At 5,000 feet down, they discovered prehistoric beach sand. It was brought up in one case from a depth of nearly three and one half miles, far from any place where beaches exist today.

"One deposit was 1,200 miles from the nearest land."
As we all know, sandy beaches form from waves breaking on the edge of the coastal rim of the seas. Beach sand does not form deep down on the ocean bottom.
Then Ewing dropped his bombshell: "Either the land must have sunk 2 or 3 miles or the sea must have been 2 or 3 miles lower than now. Either conclusion is startling."

WHAT THIS MEANS
These facts mean one of two things: either there was a mighty ocean bed subsidence (unexplainable by orthodox science), or a huge (likewise unexplained) addition of water to the ocean.

Note above how the time between Ice Ages decreases as you go back in time. This is an indication that our sun is in orbit around something that imparts additional light and heat. Note also how the Ice Ages are smaller and less severe 700-hundred thousand years back in time. 

Note also that these are Antarctic Ice core samples and Antarctica is much colder than the rest of the world so the temperature does not reflect the actual average global temperatures. For the most part, Antarctica has had ice caps for a very long time.

Let's briefly consider these.

1. Sudden subsidence: Much of the landscape that is now drowned by the ocean still has sharp, fine profiles. But these sharp, fine profiles would have been eroded, and the lava covering the ocean floor would have decayed if all this rocky terrain had been immersed in sea water for more than 15,000 years.
You see, chemical and mechanical forces are very destructive. Sharp edges and points can be ground down and blunted by abrasion, erosion, and the action of waves.
But the entire seabed below the present surf zone has retained its sharpness of profile. Had the subsidence taken place gradually, chemical and other forces would have ground down this sharp profile within a few hundred years.
If the land had sunk slowly, even the surf would have worn away these profiles. No, it was a rapid subsidence, if a subsidence it was.
This sudden collapse of an area covering many millions of square miles does not support a gradual sinking, but rather a cataclysmic event.
Such subsidence is perfectly in keeping with the centuries-long adjustments that occurred after the Great Flood trauma.

2. Pre-Flood sea level lower however, some of the data strongly suggest that the sea level actually was several thousand feet lower than at present - that there was LESS WATER in the ocean at one time. These discoveries suggest that we are uncovering evidence of a former sea level!
But this would call for a relatively sudden increase of 30 percent in the volume of the ocean. The compelling question is, WHERE DID THIS WATER COME FROM? Few geologists can bring themselves to answer this.

Note above that the temperature was much higher in the Vostock Region of Antarctica millions of years ago. Antarctica was still very cold compared to the rest of the globe but average global temperatures were actually over 60 F until about three million years. Suddenly after the Banard's Loop explosion in Orion the average global temperatures suddenly dropped down to around 32 degree F. or zero C and stayed there. 

Obviously, melting ice sheets could never have contained enough water to raise the ocean level thousands of feet. So we can forget melting ice sheets being the cause. Could it have come from the Moon?

CITY ON THE SEABED?
Now for another surprise. This time the excitement was in the Pacific. The year was 1965. A research vessel named "Anton Brunn" was investigating the Nazca Trench, off Peru.
The sonar operator called for the captain.
"I don't know what to make of this," he murmured. "Around here, the ocean floor is all mud bottom. But just take in these sonar recordings... unusual shapes on the ocean floor! I'm puzzled."
"Better lower a camera," came the order.

At a depth of 6,000 feet a photograph revealed huge upright pillars and walls, some of which seemed to have writing on them. In other nearby locations, apparently artificially shaped stones lay on their sides, as though they had toppled over.
The crew rubbed their eyes and kept staring. Could this really be? ...the remains of a city under a mass of water more than a mile deep!
Was it overwhelmed suddenly by some gigantic disaster? And now it was buried under 6,000 feet of ocean.

Another explanation for a city being 6000 feet below the sea: When the Moon was brought in hitting the Arctic Ocean the earth being a liquid ball the impact forced some land masses up while others were submerged. Antarctica, for example has an average height above sea level of 7,500 feet. I don't think it was always that highbecause the ancients mapped the sea coast very accurately. Its average elevation is now over a mile high. That is why is has such a massive ice cap. Antarctica being on the exact opposite side of the Moon impact was pushed up. People were living at Teajunaco which was at sea level. There are boat moorings 13,000 feet above sea level. Lake Titikaka was once part of the atlantic Ocean. There are old sea shells buried in the mud. I know this is all hard to accept but one has to look at the facts. 

RADIATION SHIELDING
Interstellar travel requires massive radiation shielding (not to mention dust and meteor shielding) and it stands to reason that they came here inside a hollow moon or were shielded from cosmic rays and meteorites by a moon. It can't be done any other way by our known science. If it was brought here at on a long journey throught space with a speed of say, 100 kilometers per second aft side would collect methane ice with the side facing the direction of travel the front would take a lot of hits. It would have a tremendous amount of craters much like the back side of the moon today. Negative mascons or large caves on the back of the moon would explain why it orbits with one side always facing toward earth.
All the resources on mars have been stripped. It's as if the populations that lived there took everything and left.
NOTE THAT MARS HAS A THICKER ATMOSPHERE THAN NASA WOULD HAVE US BELIEVE. IT HAS CLOUDS AND STORMS.

Will human life survie? Creation?

NO BEGINNING AND NO END

If there is no beginning and no end to the energy imbalance that allows three-dimensional mater to exist then the cycle must go on forever and life must go on forever. If that is the case we should be able to tell the age of planets by their content of higher elements which are necessary to sustain life. For example, gold and the platinum group are necessary for cell division. We already discussed how carbon is turned into limestone, which is calcium carbonate. Oil is hydrogen and carbon united by diatoms using photosynthesis. 

Given the latest data that all elements heavier than iron had to be formed in stellar explosions because the process of fusion within the stars themselves is not strong enough to create them. If this is true then planets composed of a higher percentage of heavy elements such as our Earth are much older than the norm and older than the stars themselves. Our Earth seems to have a higher gold content than the other planets in this system. If this is true then there is a good possibility that it is older than the sun and was towed into it present position for the purpose of nurturing life.

The other alternative is that instead of becoming a fuel pellet for the sun’s fusion fire it was captured accidentally along with the moon and went into the perfect orbit all by accident enabling it to harbor life.  If there is no beginning or end to the universe and life has a natural state of existence then any entropy or order variations would be evidence of manipulation by higher life forms to assist the proliferation of life (entropy being the degree of disorder in a system and order being the prevailing state of things).

To further back this theory Sir Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe showed by way of spectroscopy that a major portion of all matter in the Universe is of organic nature. In light of this, Professor Thomas Gold of Cornell University argued that a similar proportion of the matter which later aggregated to form our planet must have been of organic nature as well. One of his critical arguments related to the “Isotopic Composition Of Helium In Earthly Matter” is a good example.

Although helium occurs in the Earth’s atmosphere only one part in 200,000 and small amounts in radioactive minerals, meteoric iron and mineral springs, great volumes of helium are found as a component (up to 7.6 percent) in natural gas (methane, CH4). The common helium isotope, helium -4 (4He), probably comes from radioactive alpha emitters in rocks” (Encarta® Encyclopedia, 2002).

Gold argues that what we call the “geological evolution of the Earth is not a function of the cooling of the formerly molten astral body, but rather a function of the ongoing equilibration of what initially may well have been a cosmic refuse dump. Gravitational accretion, aided by asteroid impacts, is held responsible for the thermal processes indicated by the geologic record.

THE MID-LIFE CRISIS OF THE COSMOS

From a January 2005 Scientific American article by Amy J. Barger.

“---The best way to determine which objects are in front and which are more distant-among the thousands of galaxies in a typical deep-field, image is to obtain a spectrum of each galaxy in the image and measure its red-shift. This is called cosmic stratigraphy.”

“Because of the Universe’s expansion the light from distant sources has been stretched, stretching it wavelength to the end of the spectrum. The more the light is shifted to the red, the older it is. For example, a red shift of one means that the wavelength has been stretched 100 percent, that is, to twice its’ original size. Light from an object when this red shift was emitted is about six billion years after the big bang, which is less than half the current age of the Universe. In fact, astronomers usually talk in terms of red-shift rather than years, because red-shift is what we measure directly.” She goes on to say, “The faintness of some of the galaxies arrives at a trickle of only one photon per minute in each square centimeter. And when observers take a spectrum of the galaxy, the diffraction grating of the spectrograph disperses the light over a large area on the detector, rendering the signal even fainter at each wavelength.” It seems to me that looking at anything over six billion light years distant from us is rather impractical because the light would be shifted completely out of the light spectrum.

The fact is we don’t know what happens to photons after traveling 6 or 12 billion light years. Photons might lose energy after traveling 6-billion years. Team Hubble’s data  suggest that photons have mass because they are bent by gravity so that astronomers can see behind massive stars. Their numbers are as follows: Mass Of A Photon = 5.98-66 GRAMS. They also say that photons are very numerous compared with atoms with a ratio of 1 E 100.

Why not multiply these two numbers together to see the amount of mass of photons compared with the mass of an atom. Simply subtract -66 from 100 and you get a mass of 5.98 E 34 grams. If I am not mistaken then the mass of photons compared with a single atom is equivalent to the mass of our entire solar system including all the planets which is 2.0E 30 metric tons. There could be so many used up photons floating around out there that their sheer number would be equivalent to the 78% mass of the Universe DARK MATTER!!! We don’t know what dark matter is but it could be photons at rest. We don’t know…

If photons wear out and eventually come to rest then the whole idea of an expanding universe whose furthest point that our telescopes and sensors can see traveling close to the speed of light has to be in error. It simply is and is not expanding…      

In the late 1980s a team led by Lenox L. Cowie of the University of Hawaii Institute for Astronomy and Simon J, Lilly now at the Swiss federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, developed a novel approach to avoid the need for laborious red-shift observations. The researchers observed regions of the sky with filters that selected marrow wave-bands in the ultraviolet, green and red parts of the spectrum and then measured how bright the galaxies were in each of the wavebands.”

“---Thus Cowie and Lilly could separate star-forming galaxies into broad red-shift intervals that roughly indicated their ages. In 1996 Charles C. Steidel of the California Institute of Technology and his collaborators used this technique to isolate hundreds of ancient star-forming galaxies with red-shifts of about three, dating from about two billion years after the big bang.”

None of this makes much sense to me because three-dimensional matter could not be located a distance of red-shift three and still be the age of two billion years. First the matter would have traveled to its present location then the light would have to travel back to us and that would take at least six billion light years. If there was any validity to the big bang at all then three-dimensional matter traveling at a reasonable average speed of one-tenth light speed to its present location of red-shift it would have taken 10 X 6 = 60 billion years. Then you would add another 6 billion years to that for the light to travel back to us. But then, what do I know? It appears that scientests invented 'inflation' to compensate for these discrepencies.

The fastest moving galaxies they say are traveling at 600 kilometers per second. This is 2-million 160-thousand kilometers per hour--- far less than 1/10 light speed. How did all that stuff (three-dimensional mass) get out there a distance of 12 to 14 billion light years in two billion years?  This sounds like magic to me.

To explain the tremendous expansion of a billion light years in such a short time they came up with the magic theory of Cosmic Inflation where a bubble was formed during the first trillionth of a second of the Big Bang that pushed matter, three – d, matter out there faster than the speed of light. This is more nonsense made up to explain a non-existent happening.    

The fastest moving stars they have found so far are only travel at 300 kilometers per second. Three massive stars in the constellation Orion are traveling away from each other about 200 kilometers per second in opposite directions from each other. An explosion occurred three million years ago blasting them out of Orion. There is one star leaving our Galaxy traveling at 600 kilometers per second but this doesn’t count because it is not in or controlled by the billions of gravitational interactions of the Galaxy itself. It was ejected out of the Galaxy by a stellar explosion.    “-Optical studies in the 1980’s suggested that there were far more quasars several billion years after the big bang that there are active galactic nuclei in the present-day universe. Because the super massive black holes that powered the distant quasar activity cannot be destroyed, astronomers presumed that many nearby galaxies must contain dead quasars-black holes that have exhausted their fuel supply.”

“In 2000 a team consisting of Cowie, Richard F. Mushotzky of the NASA Goddard Space flight Center, Eric A. Richards, then at Arizona State University, and I used the Subaru telescope at Mauna Kea to identify optical counter part to 20 x-ray sources found by Chandra in a survey field.  We then employed the 10-meter Keck telescope to obtain the spectra of these objects.”

“Our result was quite unexpected: many of the active super massive black holes detected by Chandra reside in relatively nearby, luminous galaxies. Modelers of the cosmic X-ray background had predicted the existence of a large population of obscured super massive black holes, but they had not expected them to be so close at hand! Moreover, the optical spectra of many of these galaxies showed absolutely no evidence of black hole activity. Without the x-ray observations, astronomers could never have discovered the super massive black holes lurking in their cores.” “---In other words, the contents of the universe have transitioned from a small number of bright objects to a large number of dimmer ones. Even though super massive black holes are now being built smaller and cheaper, their combined effect is still potent.”

“---Fabrizio Nicastro of the Harvard Smithsonian center for Astrophysics and his co-workers have recently detected a warm intergalactic fog through its absorption of ultraviolet light and x-rays from distant quasars and active galactic nuclei. This warm fog surrounds our galaxy in every direction. It is part of the local group of galaxies, which includes the Milky Way, Andromeda and 30 smaller galaxies. Most likely this gaseous material was left over from the galaxy formation processes but is too warm to permit further galaxy formation to take place.” I have been saying it all along, the input of galactic and stellar radiation striking earth warms us a few degrees and without it we would probably freeze.

“---But a crucial part of the puzzle remains unsolved” How did the universe form monster quasars so early in its history? The Sloan Digital Survey, a major astronomical project to map one quarter of the entire sky and measure distances to more than a million remote objects, has discovered quasars that existed when the universe was only one sixteenth of its present age, about 800 million years after the big bang. In 2003 Fabian Walter, then at the national Radio Astronomy observatory, and his collaborators detected the presence of carbon monoxide in the emission from one of these quasars. Because carbon and oxygen could have been created only from the thermonuclear reactions in stars, this discovery suggests that a significant amount of star formation occurred in the universe’s first several hundred million years.”

If they are finding oxygen and carbon emissions from so-called, early quasar, this suggests there were old stars around before the quasars were formed. Something is wrong with this theory!

“Wilson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, a satellite that studies the cosmic background radiation, also indicates that star formation began just 200 million years after the big bang.”

If this is true then how did all that matter get out there to a distance of 12 to 14 billion light years? It must have traveled much faster than the speed of light to get there.  The answer is obvious. The universe is much older than they would have us believe. The more I read about this the more I think the universe is and always was and that astronomers are making it more complicated than it needs to be. For example, the stretching of space where matter travels faster than the speed of light may be a religious illusion created to conform to the Biblical creation.

“The Universe’s expansion causes most galaxies to recede from each other, apparently moving faster than the speed of light. Light’s “speed Limit” applies only to short distances, which are governed by special relativity. But space itself is expanding and, therefore, galaxies are farther from us have increasingly higher velocities, which can be faster than the speed of light.”-Astronomy September 06.  All this may be an illusion because photons might wear out and slow down after 10-billion years. We just don’t know. 

Furthermore, computer simulations have shown the first stars were most likely hundreds of times as massive as the sun. Such stars would have burned so brightly that they would have run out of fuel in a few tens of millions of years; then the heaviest stars would collapsed to black holes, which could have formed the seed of the super massive black holes that powered the first quasars. This explanation for the early appearance of quasars may be bolstered by the further study of gamma-ray bursts, which are believed to result from the collapse of very massive stars into black holes. Because gamma-ray bursts are the most powerful explosions in the universe since the “big bang,” astronomers can detect them at very great distances.

This past November, 2004 NASA was expecting to launch the Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission, a $250-million satellite with three telescopes designed to observe the explosions in the gamma-ray, x-ray, ultraviolet and optical wavelengths-.”

Is this another case of science altering the data to fit the Big Bang paradigm? It will be interesting to see what the Swift Gamma-ray Burst mission comes up with. Also, if the Universe is 12.8 billion years old; then how did all that mass get out there? Even if it were traveling 600 kilometers per second it couldn’t possibly travel that far. But, what do I know? I am just a fisherman!

Oh Yea! And how do they explain distant colliding Galaxies? In order for Galaxies to collide they have to form first which take a few billion years then they have to accidentally drift into one another. It seems to me that all this would take a very long time and is more evidence of an endless process.

If they are finding oxygen and carbon emissions from so-called early quasars, this suggests that there were old stars around before the quasar was formed. Is this a case of altering the data to fit the Big Bang paradigm again?  Another conundrum regarding the so-called creation theory is the presence of large quantities of Iridium in the cosmos. Iridium is quite rare in the earth’s crust; one ten-thousandth that of gold. The abundance of iridium in space means the universe is very, very old indeed. Iridium is one of the platinum group metals on the high end of the periodic table of elements. I believe it has the highest melting temperature of all the elements. In order to have an abundance of iridium in space you first have to have a great number of large stars collapse or explode to create the iridium. That takes a very long time. First you have to create big stars and wait around ten billion years for them to blow up in order to get iridium. This takes a very long time and I view it as more evidence for an endless universe.

PHYSICISTS FIND FLAW IN COSMIC SYMMETRY

“In general, symmetry is the rule in the Universe-the world makes perfect sense if seen in a mirror, for instance - but in April - 2003, physicist Edward Stephenson of Indiana University found a flaw in the balance of nature that researchers have been seeking for decades. Scientists have assumed this imbalance, call charged-symmetry breaking, had to exist because without it there would be no hydrogen, and hence no galaxies, planets, or people.

“There was a point about one second after the big Bang when neutrons and protons condensed out of the underlying mixture of particles, “ Stephenson says, “The neutrons decayed into protons, but the protons remained stable. After 10 or 20 minutes, there was an enormous amount of the subatomic materials needed to form hydrogen, which is the building block of stars and galaxies. It is all a consequence of charge symmetry breaking down.” The effects of charge symmetry breaking are still evident today.  Neutrons are measurably more massive than protons, which have an electric charge but are otherwise identical, because of a bias built into the laws of physics.

Until recently all of this remained theory; Stephenson put it to the test at the Indiana University cyclotron Facility.  He and his colleagues slammed a beam of heavy hydrogen atoms into a cloud composed of more heavy hydrogen. Most of the time, the encounter obliterated the atoms. One time in 10-billion, however, two heavy hydrogen nuclei fused to make a helium atom and a particle called a peon, which helps bind an atomic nucleus together. That reaction can occur only by breaking charge symmetry. Physics at Ohio University observed similar evidence of symmetry violation by colliding neutrons and protons to form heavy hydrogen and pions. They also announced their results in April 2003.

The big question now is why particles can occasionally evade laws that apply the rest of the time.  Stephenson plans further experiments to measure the rate of symmetry violation, which may help piece together this puzzle.

YOU CAN’T DRIVE A CAR WITHOUT A NEUTRON STAR!   

We live on a planet that is friendly toward life with a rich CO2 and O2 atmosphere and then we orbit around a group of stars just close enough to melt the ice ages. The ultraviolet light from a small neutron or white-dwarf star of only 1 ½ earth diameters replenish the oxygen and lays down the limestone, gas, oil and coal deposits and it does this without destroying all life on earth. I would say that the odds of something like that happening by pure chance have to be in the neighborhood of say, a billion---possibly a trillion to one. Such odds go way beyond what any jury in the country would accept as testimony to the truth so I would say that this has to be scientific proof for the existence of God!

At the present time our government could be doing the wrong thing by attempting to slow down global warming by spraying aluminum powder in the upper atmosphere and using HAARP transmitters to heat it so that cold air near space descends toward earth. This could wipe out whole cities when the cosmic radiation from space destroys the DNA. On top of that you have the aluminum powder, fluroid in the drinking water, Styrofoam cups, microwaves, and genetically modified foods that dumb down the population to where they don’t care.

HAARP is just one of many government-funded toys for globalist, megalomaniacs’ bent on world domination for the purpose of securing what they think are non-renewable resources and they are using your hard-earned tax money to do this.

All wars are planned by people who make money by financing arms manufacturers. It is a global industry funded by power brokers (the shareholders of the Federal Reserve Banking system) that make money financing small arms manufactures and countries to fight against each other. If a particular country has valuable resources the power brokers will own those countries until their debt is paid off and in most cases it is never paid.

Lady Diana Spencer was murdered because she was trying to stop the endless war (jihad) between the Muslim and Christian countries by marrying Dodi Fieaz. The power brokers had to kill both Dodi and Diana in order to stop any kind of alliance between the two warring factions. Bush is working for the people who put him into office. The jihad (endless war) will keep the military industrial complex busy for decades. The next war is already being planned between the United States and China.

GLOBAL WARMING PROPAGANDA IS A TOOL FOR SOCIETAL CONTROL

Al Gore made millions selling carbon credits (factious currency) to big corporations. This allows them to do business as usual spewing carbon into the atmosphere. It’s like the Mafia’s protection racket. As long as they pay they can still play (stay in business).

Global warming is about the government forcing you to drive a smaller car, live in a smaller house (tent or yurt) and restricting your mobility. You will no longer be allowed to take a jet plane to London or Paris because you won’t be able to afford the carbon credits. Rich people however, can go on doing business as usual and fly to Europe any time it strikes their fancy because they own stock in the airline or have friends in the airline business.   

Note how the Ice Ages were not as long in the past indicating that our Sun is in a decaying orbit around smething that imparts additional light and heat to Earth.

1.      Global warming is good and ice ages are bad. Why is the government so concerned with global warming and the release of carbon dioxide? It has to be just another excuse to control (exterminate or reduce) human populations. Carbon dioxide (CO2)  is good for plants. The more CO2 there is in our atmosphere and the warmer it is the better our farms and gardens will grow! Right now the CO2 content of our atmosphere is down to only .033%. CO2  is a trace gas. At one time in the geologic past it had to be between 20 and 30% in order to have coal seams 100-feet thick and limestone layers 12,500-feet thick on Earth formed during the 80-million year Carboniferous Era.

2.      Human activity on earth releases CO2 which is a good thing. For all we know it might be humanity’s mandate to release Co2 to keep earth green. CO2 also shields us to some extent from harmful UV and space radiation. To understand more clearly where we are in the ice age cycle please refer to the five-million-year-old ocean sediment graph. You can see on this graph that the ice age cycle began about 3 million years ago and that the ice ages are steadily getting more severe. This is due to the fact that our elliptical orbit around the Sirius system is steadily traveling further away from these stars each orbit. The coming ice age may cover up to 90% of the earth. If someone on this planet were smart enough to figure this stuff out, they would have done it by now. Why is it that I, a, commercial-fishermen, has to tell the scientists what causes ice ages?
Note how the Antarctic temperature trend is dropping on the graph below...

2. One thing is for certain. If you took the moon away the earth would suddenly be plunged back into an ice age. The moon came into orbit around earth after Venus entered the solar system. Earth had a much more erratic orbit around the sun and as did Venus at that time. When Venus was at apogee and Earth at paragee the moon came around and was swapped into orbit after bouncing off the North Pole. Moon rocks are two billion years older than earth. The moon came from some place else!

3. The impact of and the gravity of the moon took us out of the last ice age prematurely with heat from the friction of the tides and the lithosphere. The equatorial bulge caused by the moon’s impact stabilizes earth’s rotation so that it cannot undergo another radical pole shift of the crust slipping over the mantel. This made earth a much more stable place to live.

4. After the moon came the exquisitely-carved, Fulsome point arrowheads disappeared and a black layer of algae was laid down by massive flood waters. After the flood the more primitive Clovis Points appeared signifying that the people who colonized the earth had to start over. It must have been rough for them to survive as evidenced by the fact that they had lost most of their technology. If such an event were to occur today the survival rate today would be next to nothing.

5. The course and energy input of our solar system is affected by stars that we are orbiting around in the local group. Precession of 25,920 years is equal to one quarter of our orbit periods of 103,680 years. Galactic extinction happens every 27 million years. When large objects pass close by our sun the fusion tides are activated causing it to put out more energy. The galactic pulse may be responsible for the 26 million-year, extinctions. Such a pulse might also create coronal mass ejection’s (CME’s) powerful enough to hit earth.

6. The Earth’s biosphere is not a closed system. David Rup and Jack Septowski at the University of Chicago cataloged a list of all the known plant and animal species that have disappeared during earth’s recorded history and found that there are regular occurring extinctions every 26 million years. The fact that the extinctions are regular implies that objects associated with orbiting stars or galactic pulses coming from outside the solar system to affect the history of life on earth.  (See figure 3).

7. Brad Guth’s 105,000-year orbit calculations show that changing orbits of Sirius B doubles the intensity (luminosity) in the ultraviolet and infrared light spectrums reaching Earth when our orbit takes us near these giant stars. The incoming stellar infrared and ultraviolet energy changes the amount of heat and light energy that changes the climate causing an average temperature variance of ten to twelve degrees.

Temperature changes up to fourteen degrees have been documented by Antarctic ice core samples. This is enough to cause ice ages to melt. (See temperature-data, figure 4.) The ices ages last 90,000 years and have ten to twelve-thousand year warming periods in between.  www.guth.tripod.com and www.alaskapublishing.com

8. I believe that since the time our sun was captured by the Sirius system two billion years ago more circular orbits around Sirius A and B is responsible for producing most of the World’s oil, coal and limestone. It wasn’t until something pushed into an elliptical orbit that we went into the ice age cycle three million years ago. A stellar explosion near Orion put us in the ice age cycle.

Oil deposits generally occur alongside limestone deposits and are thought to be made by ancient sea creatures such as diatoms or possibly the fermentation of plankton. I personally saw pieces of limestone that had been ejected out of volcanoes in Kansas with crude oil tar on them. The Internet says that Oil is formed in shallow seas by diatoms. Take your pick! You can’t drive a car without a neutron star!

I am now convinced the earth would have a perpetual ice age if it weren’t for our orbit around the Sirius System.  Most of the Earth would be covered with ice except for a narrow band of exposed surface extending around the Equator about twenty degrees north and south. Evidence of glaciations has been found as far south as the Hawaiian Islands.

It is generally accepted common knowledge that ice ages last about 90,000 with brief warming periods lasting 10 thousand or so years in between. The warming periods correspond with the drop in CO2 data and Oil, limestone, and coal deposition. It is obvious that something outside our solar system is adding just enough energy in the ultraviolet spectrum to bring this about. In other words, the earth would be in a constant ice age forever and there would be no oil or coal if it weren’t for something outside our solar system warming it up from time to time every 105,000 years.

The fact that, galaxies are most all the same size, suggest that there are fundamental forces at work limiting their size. The black holes in the center that create the m-state dust that stars are made of. Galaxies limit their size unless they collide with other galaxies in which case they grow larger. Feeding it a few hundred million stars seems to make them larger.

Note how the time period bewteen Ice Ages is less the further you go back in time. This is an indication that we are in orbit around something that imparts additional heat and light to Earth.

The Earth’s so-called, 2012 galactic alignment has not affected us. I personally don’t think it will have too much of an adverse effect on life. From our prospective billions of stars will line up creating an electron and photon field. There will be more cosmic radiation than usual and earth’s atmosphere will be brighter at night. The increased radiation may cause human brains to be more active (probably not smarter). Photon and electron fields do affect DNA and it could activate certain codes making all cells evolve faster. From our prospective time will appear to speed up as everything will come on faster.

BIG BANG A LOT OF HOGWASH

Everything out there seems to be moving in a circular orbit so how could there be a big bang? Everything down to the basic building blocks of matter including the quark is moving in an ellipse or orbiting around something else, how could there be a big bang? If there was a big bang then everything should be moving further away from everything else instead of heading toward the big collector. So, why do galaxies collide? Why do we see so many remnants of galaxies that have suffered a collision from another galaxy?  Is our local-group of stars a remnant of a collision with another galaxy? The red shift distortion of the expanding model is misleading.

In 1964 George Gamow, the principal architect of the Big Bang Theory made the case for a universe that began billions of years ago as an explosion from an infinitely dense and infinitely small seed or energy. Fred Hoyle championed the Steady State Theory where the universe was infinite with no beginning and no end and where matter is continuously created in the space between galaxies. Both theories had strengths and weaknesses, for example, the Big Bang successfully accounted for the known abundance of hydrogen and helium but posited an embarrassing beginning that could not be explained.

The Steady State Theory avoided the stumbling block of a universe that seemed to come from nowhere but replaced it with particles of matter appearing continuously from nothing. This was before we knew about the existence of ORME particles (orbitally rearranged monatomic elements). The Big Bang Theory made one prediction that was testable: if the universe began in a blaze of luminosity, a degraded remnant of that radiation should still be in existence everywhere and this microwave radiation could be calculated.

With the calculation of the cosmic microwave background radiation, the Big Bang Theory delivered a knockout punch to the Steady State Theory.  In my opinion the idea that a single point the size of a proton exploded with such force as to create space itself belongs in the loony bin. It gets even loonier when they say it expands to a bubble 100,000 light years in diameter and then creates all the dark matter and dark energy plus the more complex matter and higher life forms in the entire Universe. This is nothing more than the religious dogma of certain scientists placating the Church by trying to make String Theory and Big Bang Theory fit the creation myth.  Now we know however, that there are thousands of black holes in our own galaxy alone that could account for the background radiation of space.       

So far our investigations have shown that there is no such thing as the big bang because everything out there is revolving around something else. The orbits may last millions even billions of years. For example, ‘scientists’ and ‘astronomers’ say our galaxy takes 200 million years to make one revolution. According to the books that I have read our galaxy will make about 20 revolutions before it dissipates. This is a lot of hogwash because Hubbil enabled us to see colliding galaxies. In order for this to happen, galaxies have to be much older than mainstream scientists so dogmatically proclaims. You see, they are all desperately trying to make everything fit into the “Big Bang” theory.  Mankind’s total existence (using mainstream astronomy) represents one percent of one revolution of our galaxy. The total existence of the dinosaurs represents only three-quarters of one revolution. How could there be a big bang that created everything if everything is orbiting something else?

Some physicists and astronomers say the Universe is collapsing due to some unknown particle that makes up the dark matter mass. They are looking for neutrinos, wimps and other particles using photo-multiplier tubes under tons of heavy water buried deep in underground salt mines. So far they have not found what they are looking for. Now they are saying that the furthest out galaxies are accelerating away from us. I wish they would make up their minds.  What they fail to realize is that empty space itself has one to three billion atoms per cubic meter. This mass alone might be enough to account for the gravitational force of dark matter. Then you have the inter-dimensional ORME particles.

This particle our science doesn’t seem to recognize is m-state (ORME atoms), orbitally rearranged monatomic elements may account for most of the mass and they are inter-dimensional in nature (due to their high-speed electrons). There could be incredible amounts of them throughout space and we would never be able to see or detect them because they exist in a higher dimension and have little or no mass. If you heat them or charge them with a magnetic field or electricity they disappear from third dimension. They also repel magnetic field due to their unique shape. The electrons orbit in a ring so that when a magnetic field is introduced they produce the same magnetic polarity and like polarities repel each other. Due to this unique property they could be used as shields for spacecraft and possibly tractor beams. When energy is added they go to a higher, non-reactive, energy-state and time. Cool them off and they reappear. They weigh seven tenths of the weight of the original element they are transmuted from at room temperature. Half of the periodic table of elements can exist in the ORME-state.

ORME atoms respond to brain-wave frequencies. I am reasonably certain they were created by a higher power for the purpose of regulating the behavior of the Universe.  The evidence speaks for itself. Read my books Philosophers Stone, Spaceships of the Gods and Home of the Angels to find out more about this advanced alien technology.
 

BRING ON THE NOBEL PRIZE!

Our Universe is based on geometry that changes constants as time and energy change. This points to m-state as being the dark matter and energy and mass that make up 69% of the Universe. As you will learn from reading my book, Philosopher’s Stone this subsistence can be controlled by thought [magnetic or Messner fields] and exists in ratios as high as ten-thousand to one. Would a supreme intelligence have it any other way?  Manifestation of three-dimensional matter from m-state is simply a matter of thinking the proper Messner frequency.  On January 8, 2005 Theoretical Physicist, Michio Kaku was on the Coast to Coast Art Bell radio show talked about sting theory and why the Galaxy doesn’t fly apart.  According to Dr. Kaku the Galaxy should have flow apart a long time ago because it is rotation too fast.  Astronomers and Theoretical Physicists theorize that dark matter surrounding the Galaxy must be holding it together.  This material whatever it is has a lot of mass. NASA and other scientific organizations have been trying to take a picture of it for years. Every time they point a camera at it they get nothing so they theorize that it exists in another dimension.” {This is true!} Art Bell spoke up at this point and said, “Whoever figures this out will get the Nobel Prize.”

My research into the inter-dimensional ORME particles (orbitally rearranged monatomic elements) or m-state in my book, Philosophers Stone explains how this might hold the Galaxy together and solve the dark matter problem. ORME atoms are two atoms combined sharing all their protons and neutrons in the center nucleus. Since these particles have basically the same charge they tend to push apart like little magnets so you get a nucleus that is eight times larger in diameter than a normal atom. Instead of one Fermi in diameter the nucleus is eight Fermi’s or larger.  Since you have double the number of electrons orbiting these particles they tend orbit out much further away from the nucleus at about 1000 Fermi’s’ and form a ring much like Saturn. This produces a particle that cannot form an electron bond into the three-dimensional matter that we are familiar with but is pushed around with various magnetic fields it comes in contact with. These particles have to remain a monatomic or in the single atom state because their electrons are paired up in a ring orbiting in opposite directions. They cannot form an electron bond. Everything we are familiar with in the third dimension is held together by electron bonds.

ORME particles or m-state floats around between third-dimensional matter and actually repels it. Whenever one of these particles with a ring of opposite rotating electrons encounters a magnetic or gravitational field they reproduce the same field and push third-dimensional matter away. It works on the same principle as the electric transformer that is composed of rings of copper windings.  This is not rocket science. This stuff repels 3-D matter and it has mass. In fact, it has the 5/8^th the mass of the two atoms it is lowest transmuted from. As far as we know half the periodic table of elements can exist in the ORME or m-state.  We are finding in huge quantities compared to three-dimensional matter. It seems to exist in rations of 10,000 to one. In other words, when there is one atom of gold there could be 10,000 m-state atoms in the neighborhood. If this ratio hold true for the rest of the Universe then dark matter has to be m-state and the way it behaves repelling three-dimensional matter it does seem to fit the cosmological model. A tremendous repelling mass would hold the Galaxy together and allow it to rotate much faster. ORME particles are opposite of three-dimensional matter which is held together with electrons. This stuff repels everything with a magnetic or gravitational field. It will jump away from a magnet. Go to subtleenergies.com and watch the video clip.  

According to physicists (as mentioned elsewhere in this book) dark energy makes up 78 % of the universe. Dark matter makes up 28% of the mass of the universe and three-dimensional matter makes up less than 1 % of the mass of the Universe. These figures could be off by a factor of one thousand because scientists don’t have any way to weigh dark matter and dark energy. ORME particles could very well account for the bulk of this dark matter mass, especially if they exist in ratios as high as 10,000 to one. ORME particles can be mass-less depending on their energy state.  ORME particles exist in a higher dimension, or dimensions, (higher energy-states) most of the time when their electron rings exceed the speed of light. This makes them invisible to third-dimension, telescopes and other means of detection. If you could see them they would look like miniature galaxies.

The vibrating strings that bind everything in string theory are actually the non-local Meisner Fields propagated by the electrical rings of ORME particles. If these particles exist in space in the quantities that we think they do (up to 10,000 to 1) then it would explain how photons travel through space with little or no loss of power or amplitude.  Since ORME particles super-conduct at room temperature they would be even more efficient in the cold of space. Since photons have little or no mass and can exist as a wave or a particle they are kind of inter dimensional particle in their own right. Every time a photon enters the proximity of an ORME particle it would be absorbed and kicked out 180 degrees on the other side faster than the speed of light with virtually no loss of power. It would actually be leaving before it entered but that is a matter for Physicists to argue over.    

Bring on the Nobel Prize!

One of the arguments for the Big Bang theory is that there appears to be large areas of empty space beyond 14 billion light years. Who is to say that electrons don’t come to rest after traveling 14 billion light years? Maybe they run down and loose their ability to travel through space. All particles decay and nothing lives forever. Our perceptions are warped because we don’t live long enough to see these things happening.     

SPACE GOES ON FOREVER AND EVER!

The following article in July 2004 issues of Scientific American by George Musser lends more credence to my theory that there was no big bang and space is an ongoing process that has neither beginning nor end.  Reinhard Genzel of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany: “...For instance, sensitive infrared observations have spotted giant galaxies just a couple of billion years after the big bang, which is early by cosmological standards. Many of these systems contain mature stars and so must have arisen even earlier. Moreover, the mix of elements in galaxies indicates that bigger ones are older than their smaller brethren.”

Genzel and his colleagues’ latest work tightens the screws even further. They focus on sub-millimeter galaxies, so called because astronomers see them in light with a wavelength a bit shorter than one millimeter. Because Cush light is hard to detect, these galaxies were discovered in 1997, even though they are some of the brightest objects in the universe. Genzel’s team has measured the orbital speed of gas clouds within 11 of these systems, giving the first unambiguous measurement of the mass of galaxies in the early universe: greater than 1000 billion solar masses, as hefty as the biggest galaxies in the present-day universe.  Extrapolated to the whole sky, the team’s work implies 50 million of these heavyweights, 100 times as many as models predict.”

“They’re absolutely right,” admits theorist Carlos Frenk of the University of Durham in England. “The models we put out three years ago did not produce enough big galaxies” in the distant past. Some claim that the findings cast a pall over the very concept of dark matter, but Genzel, Frenk and others say that the dark matter is behaving as it should; it is the ordinary matter mixed in with it that is causing the trouble.”

“Dark matter may seem exotic, but cosmologists regard it as the essence of simplicity. It is “cold,” endowed with little energy, and it responds only to the force of gravity. Ordinary matter, in contrast, is a cauldron of nuclear reactions, shock waves, magnetism, and turbulence-a mess that cosmologists whimsically call gastrophysics...” Even by the exacting standards of astronomers, the galaxy that Alan Stockton of the University of Hawaii at Manos and his colleges discovered last year is a real head-scratcher. It is massive (300 billion stars or thereabouts) and mature (its reddish hue implies that the stars are two billion years old) in a comparatively (some 2.6 billion years after the big bang). Stranger still, it seems like the Milky Way.  For a disk to endure, the galaxy could not have collided with another sizable galaxy. Because such collisions are the usual triggers for rapid star formation, astronomers are left wondering how the galaxy managed to create so many stars so quickly!!!

The answer can only be that the Universe is incredibly old-possibly ageless. The following is transcribed directly from a video about Stephen Hawking. It is his voice created by speech synthesizer. Stephen Hawking: 
“...The No Boundary Universe is a proposal that has some interesting implications. Without boundaries the Universe has no beginning and no end. We don’t have to explain its creation. The universe simply exists. But, the consequences of the No Boundary proposal cannot be worked out fully without a complete quantum theory of gravity that will unite General Relativity and Quantum mechanics. We are back to the search for the theory of everything.” 

“The Expansion of the Universe suggested the possibility that the Universe had a beginning in the past. The point at which the Universe may have started out became known as the “Big Bang.”

“In an unchanging Universe one can imagine that God created the Universe at any time in the past. On the other hand, if the Universe is expanding there may be physical reasons why there had to be a beginning. An expanding Universe does not preclude a creator but it does place limits on when he might have carried out his job.  Einstein’s theory of General Relativity show that the Universe was expanding.”

However, we don't know what happens to photons after traveling 12-billion years. They might looose energy and appear to shift to the red which would make it look like the Universe is expandig but ir really not.. Photons might wear out in a universe with no beginning and no end. In fact, the unknown dark matter might be photos at rest. We don't know. At this poinnt in time there is no way to tell what it is made of.

“Roger Penrose proved that a dying star collapses into a singularity. I wondered if the Universe would also collapse into a singularity? As a massive star collapses its gravity becomes so strong that light cannot escape. The laws of physics do not apply under conditions as time and mass no longer exist.”

“...The number of black holes may outnumber the number of stars in our Universe.” “Particles can escape from a black hole. Black holes are not completely black. At first, I didn’t believe it. I was unsure of my discovery so I didn’t tell many friends.”

“According to Quantum Mechanics space is filled with virtual particles that are constantly materializing in pairs separating and coming together to annihilate again. In the presence of a black hole one member of a particle may fall in leaving the other particle with nothing to annihilate with. Quantum Mechanics allows particles to escape from a black hole. Einstein did not fully accept Quantum Mechanics and said, “God does not play dice...” “Black hole radiation has shown us that gravitational collapse is not as final as we once thought. If an astronaut falls into a black hole his atoms will be recycled.”

“In 1981 my interest in the fate of the Universe was reawakened when I attended a conference on Catholics in the Vatican. Afterwards I met the pope and he told us that it was all right to study the evolution of the Universe after the big bang but that we should not inquire into the big bang itself because the moment of creation was the work of God. I was glad he did not attend the conference I had just given-the possibility that the Universe had no beginning and no creation.”

“If one goes back in time one comes to the point where the laws of physics break down. Time is a word invented by man.” “If the Universe is completely self contained with no boundary or no end it would neither be created, not destroyed. It would simply be.”

“Where does the difference in the past and the future come from? The laws of physics are not changed by time. I began to wonder what would happen when the Universe began to stop expanding and began to contract. Would we see broke cups gather themselves together off the floor and jump back on the table?”

Stephen gave a colleague the problem to solve. He worked on it a month or so and came back to Stephen with a no answer. Again Stephen sent him to solve the problem but to no avail. Eventually Stephen ordered that they write a computer program and in a few months they had their answer. Stephen had made a mistake. His idea that time and the Universe would reverse like a collapsing star was wrong.  Time will not reverse and we will continue to get older. The Unified Theory is so compelling that it brings about its own existence.

“Whatever happens 10-billion years from now I will not be around to be proven wrong?”
      

Stephen fully realized that when matter approaches the speed of light time slows down. Much like the race between the turtle and the hare the hare can never catch the tortoise. Therefore there can be no beginning and no end.  The number of heavy elements on earth is proof of an endless, no-boundary Universe. Heavy elements like irridium, platinum and gold are made in stellar and glactic explosions. In other words, many stars have to gow to old age and blow up before the heavy elements cand find their way to earth. 

ASTEROID THREAT GETTING SERIOUS ATTENTION

Apophis was the ancient Egyptian name for evil and destruction that plunged the entire world into eternal darkness. Today it is the name given to an asteroid 1,200 feet across which is on a collision course with earth. Discovered in 2004 it could hit with the equivalent force of 100,000 nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima. If it fails to hit us in 2029 it could swing around the sun again and hit us in 2036.

Experts studying near earth objects are warning us to prepare by developing the technology to deflect them. The Guardian, a British newspaper, reported a London meeting of experts that suggested that efforts to deflect asteroids should begin now. The chances of such an object hitting the ocean is five times greater than hitting land because the oceans cover 4/5 of the globe. The devastation of the coastline caused by such an object would be tremendous and there are other even larger, undiscovered objects out there that couldn’t at any time.

A congressionally directed program called Pan- STARRS is intended to increase earth’s early warning system. Whether or not this or any government-funded program will work remains to be seen.

The above article was taken from my book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES. If you would like to read the entire book please order from one of the following: Trafford.com, www.Amazon.com, www.GuardDogBooks.com, www.AlaskaPublishing.com  Thanks!