REWARDING RAPISTS (and where it leads).
If the following is true (and I have no doubt it is); ask yourself the questions that follow it. Jim
Obama-Kerry United Nations Treaty Requires US To Hand Over American Gun Registrations
Did you know this? During September of 2013, John Kerry “on behalf of
President Obama and the United States of America”, said (lied?) at the United Nations in New York,
“This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom. In fact, the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legitimate purposes. Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans … to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution.”
But here’s where he misled you about the UN Arms Trade Treaty…
The New American reports that the UN Arms Trade Treaty was written in secret by the Obama/Hillary Clinton State Department, along with Russia, China, France and Britain.
Not exactly a lineup of champions of liberty.
What does the treaty actually say?
Article 2 defines the conventional arms covered, which include battle tanks,
artillery systems, combat aircraft,
attack helicopters, warships, missiles — and “small arms and light weapons.”
Article 3 of the treaty places UN prohibitions on “ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms (including small arms) covered under Article 2.”
Article 4 puts all “parts and components” of weapons (including small arms) within the scheme.
QUESTIONS:
How can ANY American elected politician or bureaucrat (government employee) THAT TAKES AN OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION (this by definition and of necessity includes THE BILL OF RIGHTS, i.e. the first 10 Amendments, and all subsequent and un-repealed Amendments)…. How can such a person do ANYTHING IN ANY WAY, THAT USURPS, CHANGES OR DESTROYS ANY PART OF THE Constitution in any way under the color of “office”?
How can any action they take in such regard be found legal or justifiable or legitimate in ANY way?
When any such person or persons does such thing under nefarious circumstances such as clandestinely drafting and negotiating a “Treaty” with the intent of manufacturing federal jurisdiction to authorize the usurpation of the 2nd Amendment to register and confiscate “Arms” and “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” outside the specific rules laid out in the Constitution for Amendments by creating a “Treaty” with no accountability by other signatories (true of ALL UN “TREATIES”) or by attempting to disguise this destruction of the 2nd Amendment as a “needed Treaty” that equates America and Americans with 2-Bit Dictatorships and the arming of rebels engaged with the forced change or overthrow of both just and unjust governments: WHY ARE THESE CONSTITUTIONAL-DESTROYER PERPETRATORS NOT REMOVED FROM OFFICE AND CHARGED WITH HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS?
What is next?
- A UN “Treaty” requiring government approval of all comments or speech on government and government policies?
- A UN “Treaty” requiring government approval of all written material concerning government or government policies?
- A UN “Treaty” requiring government licensing of all religious organizations and what they may or may not preach?
- A UN “Treaty” requiring government approval of any public assembly?
- A UN “Treaty” authorizing searches and seizures at government whim?
- A UN “Treaty” to authorize serial prosecutions and the forcing of persons to witness against themselves until they are found guilty or innocent as “needed” by government?
- A UN “Treaty” making all private property subject to absolute government control and policies?
- A UN “Treaty” that forbids any diffusion of National authority wherein “Lower” States, any Congress or any Court System limits or influences The National Supreme Elected Official?
HELLO! Is there anybody out there?
Jim Beers
21 January 2014
If you found this worthwhile, please share it with others.
