MADE IN AMERICA

AMERICAN MANUFACTURED VS IMPORTS
> Thought this was interesting.
>> Most Dollar General merchandise is made in the USA and are cheaper
> and just as good.
>> Made in the U.S.A. or not. This is an eye-opener !
> ACE HARDWARE - Made in the USA - Very Encouraging.
> READ ALL THE WAY TO THE BOTTOM! LOTS OF GOOD INFO HERE!
> Costco sells Goodyear wiper blades for almost half the price that you
> will pay on the outside and they are made in the U.S.A.
> Read and do the following: Unfortunately our politicians & top CEO's
> have pushed for trade to China and Mexico for years so Americans are
> now out of work
> .Did you know that there is no electric coffee maker made in the U.S.
> and that the only kitchen appliances made in the U.S. is Viking?
> This information came from the a report by Diane Sawyer. Hopefully
> this has changed or will soon!
> I did not know Hallmark Cards were made in China! That is also why I
> do not buy cards at Hallmark anymore; they are made in China and are
>> more expensive! I buy them at Dollar Tree, 50 cents each and made in U.S.A.
>
>> I have been looking at the blenders available on the Internet.
> Kitchen Aid is made in the U.S. Top of my list already.
>>
>> Yesterday I was in Wal-Mart looking for a waste basket. I found some
> made in China for $6.99. I did not want to pay that much so I asked
> the clerk if
>> they had any others. She took me to another department & they had
> some at $2.50 made in U.S.A. They are just as good.
>>
>> Same as a kitchen rug I needed. I had to look, but I found some made
> in The U.S.A. - what a concept! and they were $3.00 cheaper. We are
> being
>> brainwashed to believe that everything that comes from China and
> Mexico is cheaper.
>> Not so!
>>
>> One Light Bulb at A Time.
>>
>> I was in Lowe's the other day and just out of curiosity, I looked at
> the hose attachments. They were all made in China.
>>
>> The next day I was in Ace Hardware and just for the heck of it I
> checked the hose attachments there. They were made in U.S.A.
>>
>> Start looking, people. In our current economic situation, every
> little thing we buy or do affects someone else, most often, their job.
>>
> My grandson likes Hershey's candy. I noticed, though, that it is now
> marked 'Made in Mexico.' I do not buy it anymore.
>>
>> My favorite toothpaste, Colgate, is made in Mexico. Now I have
> switched to Crest. You have to read the labels on every thing.
>>
>> This past weekend I was at Kroger, I needed 60W light bulbs and
> Bounce dryer sheets. I was in the light bulb aisle, and right next to
> the GE
>> brand I normally buy, was an off-brand labeled, "Everyday Value." I
> picked up both types of bulbs and compared them: they were the same
>> except for the price. The GE bulbs cost more than the Everyday Value
> brand, but the thing that surprised me the most was that, GE was made
>> in Mexico and the Everyday Value brand was made in, you guessed it -
> the U.S.A. at a company in Cleveland, Ohio.
>>
>> It is way past time to start finding & buying products you use every
> day that are made right here. So, on to the next Aisle: Bounce Dryer
> Sheets.
> Yep, you guessed it, Bounce cost more money & is made in Canada.
> The Everyday Value brand cost less, and was made in the U.S.A.
>>
>> I did laundry yesterday & the dryer sheets performed just like the
> Bounce Free, I have been using for years, at almost half the price.
>
>> My challenge to you is to start reading the labels, when you shop for
> everyday things, and see what you can find that is made in the U.S.A.
>> The job you save may be your own or your neighbor's!
>
>> If you accept the challenge, pass this on to others in your address
> book, so we can all start buying American, one light bulb at a time!
>>
>> Stop buying from overseas companies - you are sending the jobs there.
> (We should have awakened a decade ago.)
>> Let's get with the program and help our fellow Americans keep their
> jobs and create more jobs here in the U.S.A.
>
>> I passed this on -- Will you? If you care about American workers,
> you will pass it on.
>

Democrats...

My Mommy The  Dancer.

  

One day a  fourth-grade teacher asked the children what their mothers did for a  living.

All the  typical answers came up -- teacher, nurse, businesswoman, saleswoman, doctor,  lawyer, and so forth.

However,  little Johnny was being uncharacteristically quiet, so when the  teacher  

prodded him about his mother, he replied, "Well  my mother's an exotic dancer in a cabaret and takes off all her clothes in front  of men and they put money in her under-wear. Sometimes, if the offer is really  good, she will go home with some guy and stay with him all night for  money."

The teacher,  obviously shaken by this statement, hurriedly set the other children to work on  some exercises and then took little Johnny aside to ask him, "Is that really  true about your mother?"

No," the boy  said, "She works for the Democratic National Committee and is helping to get  Hillary Clinton to be our next President, but I was too embarrassed to say that  in front of the other kids."

 

YOUR MONEY IS UN-CONSTITUTIONAL...

Most people think that Federal Reserve notes are American money. But are they? Congress was created by several states of the Union, via the national Constitution, so it is SUBJECT to that Constitution. And while that Constitution gives it power to COIN MONEY, banknotes are NOT coins, and they're NOT money. They're a mere CURRENCY, and mere PROMISORY NOTES. Why do you think there's a signature of the US Treasurer and the secretary of the Treasury on them? Those signatures validate those notes as PROMISES to pay, by the two organizations that those two persons represent; Federal Reserve System and Dept. of Treasury.

So if Congress doesn't issue FRNs under its power to coin money, where does it get the authority to issue those? Some would want you to believe that since Congress has the Constitutional authority to borrow money on credit of United States, it also has power to emit bills (banknotes) into circulation using the borrowed money. But it CAN'T, since no such power was given to Congress. In fact that power was in Articles of Confederation, but WAS SPECIFICALLY REMOVED when Constitution was created (see below).

So the ONLY POSSIBLE power under which Congress could "emit bills" (based on the borrowed money) into circulation, is Congress's unlimited power over 10-square mile area of District of Columbia!!! So FRNs are PRIVATE "money" of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, A.K.A. the United States.
And that's FOREIGN to the United States of America (the Republic).

So I hope that you realize that Federal Reserve notes are:
1) Mere Promises to Pay
2) Issued by a PRIVATE bank
3) NOT American/national money of the Republic (lawful money)
4) Currency of the FEDERAL gov't, AKA the Legislative Democracy of the District of Columbia (legal tender)

So the ONLY way FRNs would be Constitutional, is if they're used in District of Columbia and territories. In states of the Union they're UNCONSTITUTIONAL, since they're FOREIGN CURRENCY.

If Federal Reserve is a central bank, not a national bank, then it only makes sense that FRNs are PRIVATE currency, not a national one. Furthermore where did Juilliard get the idea that power to borrow money on credit of US ALSO includes power to issue circulating notes on the money borrowed? It did NOT. The only way they could do that would be if those notes issued would be an INTERNAL currency between the banks, which I believe FRNs originally were (between 1913 and 1933), or were internal currency of D.C..

So Congress's power to borrow money on credit of US DOES NOT includes power to issue circulating notes on the money borrowed, as that power was SPECIFICALLY removed from the US Constitution, See below.

In other words, issuance of debt notes FRNs into circulation is unconstitutional, and would only be legal under Congress's unlimited power over areas under its exclusive jurisdiction, i.e. the District of Columbia. In other words, FRNs are a PRIVATE currency of the federal gov't, NOT a national currency of USA.

So FRNs are a currency of the federal gov't, so it is NOT American/national money, as America, which is a Union of 50 sovereign states, does NOT include the District of Columbia, That is just a separate territory (not a state), over which Congress has an EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction.

So they might be "lawful money" in federal areas (corporate Democracy), but not in states of the Union (dejure Republic). And by "lawful money" here I mean a valid currency, NOT real national lawful money.

In other words, FRNs are NOT national currency, but only a private (domestic) currency of District of Columbia, so if you're not a federal subject, AKA US person, you're entitled to redemption of that private scrip in national currency such as US notes.

Here's a short article that explains why Congress does NOT have power to 'emit bills' based on the borrowed money:
"The original draft of the Constitution reported to the convention by its Committee of Detail empowered Congress “To borrow money and emit bills on the credit of the United States.”⁶²⁵ When this section was reached in the debates, Gouverneur Morris moved to strike out the clause “and emit bills on the credit of the United States.” Madison suggested that it might be sufficient “to prohibit the making them a tender.” After a spirited exchange of views on the subject of paper money, the convention voted, nine States to two, to delete the words “and emit bills.”⁶²⁶ Nevertheless, in 1870, the Court relied in part upon this clause in holding that Congress had authority to issue treasury notes and to make them legal tender in satisfaction of antecedent debts.^627"

When it borrows money “on the credit of the United States,” Congress creates a binding obligation to pay the debt as stipulated and cannot thereafter vary the terms of its agreement. A law purporting to abrogate a clause in government bonds calling for payment in gold coin was held to contravene this clause, although the creditor was denied a remedy in the absence of a showing of actual damage.628

625 2 M. FARRAND, THE RECORDS OF THE FEDERAL CONVENTION OF 1787 144, 308–309 (rev. ed. 1937).
626 Id. at 310.
627 Knox v. Lee (Legal Tender Cases), 79 U.S. (12 Wall.) 457 (1871), overruling Hepburn v. Griswold, 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 603 (1870).
628 Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330, 351 (1935). See also Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571 (1934).

http://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-1/19-borrowing-power....

And it does seem to me that destroying US Notes or blocking them from circulation would be criminal, as it would deny people their right to PAY OFF the national debt, and thus leave them in a PERPETUAL DEBT, which equates to INVOLUNTARY SLAVERY.

I mean, if our use of FRNs makes us liable for the national debt, then we OBVIOUSLY should have the power to REPAY/REDUCE the principal of that loan from Federal Reserve, via the 12USC411 demand for lawful money.

And if the Treasury destroys US Notes, it FORCES on us a PERPETUAL DEBT that we're NOT ALLOWED to repay. And that IS SLAVERY.
***********************************

When you think about it, it's pretty obvious that FRNs are a PRIVATE currency, since it says "FEDERAL RESERVE notes", not "UNITED STATES notes". I.e. they're issued by Federal Reserve (a PRIVATE bank), and the Treasury seal on them just means that US is the COSIGNER for that negotiable instrument. It could also be a bill of exchange, but those usually don't have a signature of the Payor on them.

So it's just a PROMISORY NOTE issued by a PRIVATE bank, and cosigned by the Dept. of Treasury. Which means it is NOT lawful money or national currency, and no one can be forced to use it as money. And if you aren't liable to use it, you're entitled to redeem it in real, national money (gold and silver coins), or, if US is bankrupt, then in national currency which is backed by the US Treasury (thus making you a creditor of US, rather than the FedRes).

And obviously, when you sign a promisory note, you, or the organization you represent, is LIABLE to PAY IT ON DEMAND. And when you don't, you're basically a CRIMINAL, just as if you gave someone a check, well knowing that there's no money in the account to cover it.

***********************************




And here's how Congress deceived the American people by creating FEDERAL STATES such as CA, FL, TX, etc. and ZIP codes that also designate federal areas. In other words, Congress does NOT have jurisdiction in states of the Union (except for interstate commerce), so its agencies would have to REGISTER as FOREIGN AGENTS when operating in states of the Union. They don't register that way. And the way they get around that is by convincing everyone that they're living in CA, TX, WA, NY, etc. and in a federal ZIP code, which are federal areas, so they don't have to register as foreign agents, because YOU GRANT THEM JURISDICTION by admitting to live in CA, FL, NY, etc, and in a ZIP code (=federal area).

Mainstream press will never print this!!!

Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:49:02 -0700
Subject: [Fwd: Fw: Welfare Map ( Be sure to read this from top to bottom )]

READ THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Fw: Welfare Map  ( Be sure to read this from top to bottom )
 
 
 
*Please forward to all likeminded people that want to know what’s really
going on *
 
    THE NEW WELFARE MAP

    Make sure you read to the bottom...
 
    Quite an eye opener…
  
    These 11 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!
 
    Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year
2012, between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and
other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line
received $168.00 a day in government support. What's the problem with
that much support? Well, the median household income in America is
just over $50,000,which averages out to $137.13 a day. To put it
another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an
hour for a 40-hour week, while the average job pays $20.00 an hour.
 
                    Furthermore:
 
    There are actually two messages here.  The first is very
 
    interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a
lot.
               A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very
 
    interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International
 
    Health Organization.
Percentage of men and women who surviv a cancer five years after diagnosis: 
 
                U.S.                  65%
 
                England               46%
 
                Canada                42%
 
 
  Percentage of patients diagnosed with  diabetes who received treatment within six months:
 
                U.S.                 93%
  
               England               15%
  
               Canada                43%
 
  Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
 
                U.S.                  90%
 
                England               15%
 
                Canada                43%
 
 
  Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
 
                U.S.                  77%
 
                England               40%
 
                Canada                43%
 
 Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
 
                U.S.                 71
 
                England              14
 
                Canada               18

 
Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health":
 
                U.S.                  12%
 
                England                2%
 
                Canada                6%
 
 
And now for the last statistic:
  
               National Health Insurance?
 
                U.S.                 NO
 
                England             YES
 
                Canada              YES

 
               Check this last set of statistics!!
  

  The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
 
    You know what the private business sector is; a real-life business, not a government job.  Here are the percentages.
 
               T. Roosevelt.................... 38%
 
               Taft............................ 40%
 
               Wilson ......................... 52%
 
               Harding......................... 49%
 
               Coolidge........................ 48%
 
               Hoover ......................... 42%
 
               F. Roosevelt.................... 50%
 
               Truman.......................... 50%
 
               Eisenhower................. .... 57%
 
               Kennedy......................... 30%
 
               Johnson......................... 47%
 
               Nixon........................... 53%
 
               Ford............................ 42%
 
               Carter.......................... 32%
 
               Reagan.......................... 56%
 
               GH Bush......................... 51%
 
               Clinton ........................ 39%
 
               GW Bush......................... 55%
 
               Obama............................ 8%
 
 
       This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:
 
Only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!
 
That's right!  Only eight percent---the least, by far of the last 19 presidents!  And these people are      trying to tell our big corporations how to run their  business?
 
 How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in 

world history, stand and talk about business when he'snever worked for one?  Or about jobs when he has neverreally had one?  And when it's the same for 92% of hissenior staff and closest advisers?  They've spent mostof their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers."
 
    They should have been in an employment line.
 
  Pass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media!