Gay Marriage Supreme Court

President Obama uses Caitlyn Jenner as example of our country being 'more accepting' of who people 'truly are'

By Gina DiFalco, 6/26/2015

President Obama acknowledged our country’s progress when it comes to acceptance, bringing up Caitlyn Jenner’s recent transition as an example.

He attended the taping of Logo's Trailblazer Honors, where he made a moving speech about being accepting of the LGBT and transgender communities.

“When this network aired its first show, gay marriage was a political wedge issue used to divide us," he said of just 10 years ago. "Today the majority of Americans live in states where they can get married, no matter who they love. Today 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' is history.”

People reports he never mentioned Jenner by name, but mentioned her groundbreaking Vanity Fair cover.

“All you have to do is look at this month's cover of Vanity Fair to see how America is more accepting of people for who they truly are,” he continued.

Obama went on to call this progressive way of thinking a natural step. He said it shows “change is not just possible – change is inevitable.”

image from cover of Vogue

www.GuardDogBooks.com

BIBLE WRONG?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Jun 12, 2015 5:54 AM
Subject: Marijuana and marriage ( regardless of human opinion legalizing gay marriage is invitation of judgment of God )
To: "Jeff Lee" < Cc: 

MARIJUANA AND MARRIAGE

For those who haven't heard, Washington State recently passed
two laws on the same day.
They legalized gay marriage and legalized marijuana.
The fact that gay marriage and marijuana were legalized
on the same day makes perfect Biblical sense.

Leviticus 20:13 says: "If a man lies with another man they should be stoned"

Apparently we just hadn't interpreted it correctly before!

BREAKING FREE

Aren't you tired of being kicked around by municipal corporations masquerading as government? If you want to help end that, I suggest that you start asserting that you live in a State of the Union rather than in a federal region ZIP code. 

You see, the LAST part of an address contains everything BEFORE it, in it. So if the last part of your address is a ZIP code, then you've identified yourself living in a FEDERAL REGION, where muni corporations RULE.

So if you want to return back to the Republic, you gotta START by using a PROPER address in a State of the Union, which has the State Name as the LAST part of the address. Furthermore, since there are no ZIP codes in States of the Union, you gotta use POSTAL ROUTE instead of ZIP code.

EXACTLY Like this:

Jaro Henry Smith
123 Main street
Costa Mesa, Orange county
postal route 92627, California

Now that's a PLACE IN our REPUBLIC, not in some crappy federal region! Or just remain complacent and wait for Martial law, when the only option will be to pay for your freedom in blood.

And when you start using such proper addressing in ANY and ALL cases, and refuse to do otherwise, then you can consider yourself a Son of the Republic, and start living in a free country.

Here's what happens to free people when they submit to municipal corporations by use of ZIP codes; millions are jailed for victim-less "crimes":

It'd also be a good idea to stop identifying yourself as a federal citizen, and start asserting your citizenship of the Republic, which is CALIFORNIAN, TEXAN, FLORIDIAN, etc.

 

BTW, US citizenship is a citizenship of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, AKA the United States, and if one can be a citizen of a 10-mile square federal area which isn't even a State, then one CERTAINLY can be a Citizen of a State of the Union!

As you can see below, you're not an American if you claim to be a US citizen, as that means a citizen of the FEDERAL gov't (District of Columbia). Only the 50 states of the Union and THEIR Citizens, are American.

"The United States is located in the District of Columbia." - California Commercial Code 9307 h)

“The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” Volume 20: Corpus Juris Secundum, (P 1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct. 1973, 41 L. Ed. 287)

Here's what makes US jurisdiction clear:
“The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia , and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.” CAHA v. U.S., 152 U.S. 211 (1894)

U.S. Code, Title 28 – JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE, (Chapter 176) Section 3002 (15) (a, b, & c); ~
(15) ” United States ” means – (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; (C) an instrumentality of the United States

"The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF." (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)

The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)

The U.S. has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)
The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)

The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government, even though the "US Government" held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang, 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)

************************************

BTW, while federal enclaves/regions can be WITHIN the territorial limits of a State (of the Union), they are WITHOUT the State, as the State has no jurisdiction inside of them. Only Congress has an exclusive jurisdiction in those federal regions, but also its municipal corporations, such as CITY of XYZ or STATE of XYZ.

And that obviously includes federal ZIP regions. I.e. CITY of XYZ and STATE of XYZ are MUNICIPAL corporations of United States, NOT dejure governments of the Republic, and they operate in federal ZIP regions.