Affidavit

AFFIDAVIT of GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT

All men and women know that the foundation of law and commerce exists in the telling of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Truth, as a valid statement of reality, is sovereign in commerce.

An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.

An unrebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgment in commerce.

Guaranteed—All men shall have a remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy does not exist, or if the existing remedy has been subverted, then one may create a remedy for themselves – and endow it with credibility by expressing it in their affidavit.

Ignorance of the law might be an excuse, but it is not a valid reason for the commission of a crime.

All corporate government is based upon Commercial Affidavits, Commercial Contracts, Commercial Liens and Commercial Distresses. Hence, governments cannot exercise the power to expunge commercial processes.

The Legitimate Political Power of a corporate entity is absolutely dependent upon its possession of Commercial Bonds against Public Hazard.

No Bond means no responsibility, means no power of Official signature, means no real corporate political power, and means no privilege to operate statutes as the corporate vehicle.

The Corporate Legal Power is secondary to Commercial Guarantors. Case law is not a responsible substitute for a Bond.

Municipal corporations, which include cities, counties, states and national governments, have no commercial reality without bonding of the entity, its vehicle (statutes), and its effects (the execution of its rulings).

In commerce, it is a felony for the Officer of a Political/Public Office to not receive and report a Claim to its Bonding Company -- and it is a felony for the agent of a Bonding Company to not pay the Claim.

If a Bonding Company does not get a malfeasant public official prosecuted for criminal malpractice within sixty (60) days, then it must pay the full face value of a defaulted Lien process (at 90 days.)

Except for a Jury, it is also a fatal offense for any person, even a Judge, to impair or to expunge, without a Counter-Affidavit, any Affidavit or any commercial process based upon an Affidavit.

Judicial non-jury commercial judgments and orders originate from a limited liability entity called a municipal corporation – hence must be reinforced by a Commercial Affidavit and a Commercial Liability Bond.

A foreclosure by a summary judgment (non-jury) without a commercial bond is a violation of commercial law.

Governments cannot make unbonded rulings or statutes which control commerce, free-enterprise citizens, or sole proprietorships without suspending commerce by a general declaration of martial law.

It is tax fraud to use Courts to settle a dispute/controversy which could be settled peacefully, outside of or without the Court.

An official (officer of the court, policeman, etc.) must demonstrate that he/she is individually bonded in order to use a summary process.

Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent.

PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENTS: All officials are required by federal, state, and municipal law to provide the name, address and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding company, the policy number of the bond, and, if required, a copy of the policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance.

Failure to provide this information constitutes corporate and limited liability insurance fraud (15 USC), and is prim-a-facie evidence and grounds to impose a lien upon the official, personally, to secure their public oath and service of office.

If we are all equal before God then who has the power to put obligations upon us?

The Foundation Of Law
There are basically three classes of laws: The Laws of God, which encompass the Laws of Nature; The Law of the Land, also referred to as the Common Law; and lastly there is Private Law, or man-made law, also referred to as Contract Law.

Our Founding Fathers believed that it was self-evident that the God of Nature is the sovereign of the universe and everything in it (as well as mankind) and that He had endowed all mankind with "certain unalienable rights" making them self-directing sovereigns, which means that any governments instituted among men derive their just powers (only) from the consent of the governed, who are the source of earthly power and authority. Hence any attempt to exercise any powers NOT conveyed by the People is unjust and unauthorized, and any act done pursuant to such usurpation of power is void.

They were further convinced that God's temporal law for mankind was expressed in the law of the land. Common law is common-sense law. It is simple, straightforward and self evident, primarily because it is based on God's Laws. It is the foundational law of the union of States.

The Founding Fathers authorized three legal systems in the Constitution, first Common Law, secondly Equity Law, and thirdly Admiralty Law, which is the law of the sea. Gradually Common Law has been displaced by Equity Law until today the Common Law is rarely heard of or understood because it has been covered up and hidden away by the legal profession for very understandable business reasons. Such people are pursuing their own private agenda. In fact the Common Law is generally looked upon as obscene, example: to have a common law marriage is considered to be unclean. Why? The first marriage license in the United States was issued in 1863. The question is not whether some third party should or should not perform the service; it is whether sovereigns must get permission from their servants (the government) before they can be married.

It should be remembered that the People are the sovereigns of State governments and the States are the sovereigns of the federal government. Thus the People, either directly or indirectly, are the sovereigns over both governments. The States have been given specific and limited power. They also made sure there were provisions that safeguarded the People's right to abolish or change that government and to create a different one if they chose.

Public Law is a form of private law that results when laws are made in proper application of the delegated authority conveyed to the legislators. Title 18 (the Federal Criminal Code) is an example of public law. It was drafted to grant unto non-citizens the protections and defenses Citizens have under common law; Title 18 does not apply to sovereign Citizens, who answer directly to violations of GOD's Laws.

Administrative Law is one term used to describe private law that comes into existence when someone acquires dominion over others and can dictate to them what the law is. Title 26 (the Internal Revenue Code) in an example of Administrative Law; it and the other federal titles classified by congress as "non-public" (administrative) laws, thus apply only to subjects of the federal government. (EXHIBIT A: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (5pages).)

In 1938 the United States abandoned Public Law and adopted an unconstitutional system called Public Policy. An understanding of this distinction is so vital that the definitions of these terms follow:

Public Law
That portion of law which deals with the powers, rights, duties, capacities and incapacities of government and its delegated authority. Those laws which are concerned with a government in its political capacity, considered in its quasi-private personality, i.e., as capable of holding or exercising rights or acquiring and dealing with property in the character of an individual.

Public Policy
The rules and procedures (policy) of a sovereign over its subjects. It holds that no subject can lawfully do that which has a tendency to be injurious to the public or against the public good as defined by the sovereign. Public policy is set by legislative acts and, pursuant thereto, by judicial and administrative promulgating of rules and regulations. Such rules and regulations are therefore not laws but rather terms imposed by contract agreements. It's the contracts themselves which make these rules and regulations binding. If you are not a party to those contracts, not a subject (property) of the government, you can make yourself a party by volunteering to comply. But once you decide to play the game you are compelled by the rules of that game to continue to play. Once compelled, the best out is to reassert your sovereign rights. The very concept of Public Policy and its inherent usurpation of power from the sovereign People is so addictive and has become so widely accepted by bureaucrats in all levels of government that they act as if they were the masters of the People.

This shift in government was instituted with the Supreme Court's decision in the Erie Railroad case, as a result of which, all Supreme Court decisions prior to that time are being treated as no longer relevant in equity court proceedings. And so another milestone was reached in the conspiracy to overthrow the rights of the People.

This Administrative Law is much like Roman Law which is also called Civil Law. Conceptually, Roman or Civil Law, which is practiced in most of Europe, is diametrically opposite to the Common Law.

Under Roman or Civil Law you are guilty until proven innocent and have only those rights your master the government chooses to grant you; and what your master giveth, he can take away. Under the Common Law as practiced in America, you are innocent until proven guilty and retain all rights not delegated to government.

We are seeing more and more of this Roman class of laws in this country: if you are charged you are treated as being guilty until proven innocent. If that is happening to you, it's because of your legal status -- or what "they" perceive as your legal status. If your legal status is that of being a sovereign Citizen your unalienable rights are being violated!

Principles Of Law Making
In the days before the turn of the century in America, the custom was for those studying law to study the Bible and the laws contained therein so that those principles would occupy a preeminent place in the minds of those practicing law. This is not the case today; rather the opposite is true. The eternal truths contained in the Bible have been lost from the view of those who need them the most. It is still the best place to learn about laws generally, as well as other eternal truths. The concept of a system of laws not founded upon those eternal truths is tantamount to building a house on quick sand.

In America, the sovereign power resides in and comes only from the People. "We the People" are the sovereigns. All the power and authority the government has ... was given to it by the People! If we don't have the right to do a thing, then we cannot delegate such a right to any government! ("We cannot give to anyone or anything any power or authority we do not have!")

Is it not in controversion to this principle that representatives of the People -- legislators or bureaucrats or judges -- pretend they can make laws to implement powers We the People did not and cannot give them? It is self-evident! Yet they pretend they can do virtually anything they or even a majority of them merely agree among themselves (vote) to do; they publish interpretations of laws and promulgate rules based on those interpretations; or they render decisions that are clearly antithetical to the concepts set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as the Founding Fathers understood and expounded them; and thereby they violate their sworn oath to defend and uphold the Constitution.

They know that few if any who discover such usurpation will have the perseverance, let alone the financial means and time required to find a qualified, willing attorney to utilize the court system to expose their usurpation and bring them to account and thus rectify their malfunction.

They also promote and rely on the general MISCONCEPTION that any statute passed by a legislature is valid. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail! This is succinctly stated as follows:

"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed ...

"Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it ... No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2nd §177

"The general rule is that an unconstitutional act of the Legislature protects no one. It is said that all persons are presumed to know the law, meaning that ignorance of the law excuses no one; if any person acts under an unconstitutional statute, he does so at his peril and must take the consequences." 16 Am Jur 2d §178

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 at 491.

In order for a law to be proper, it must be just. It must protect equally the rights of all without violating the rights of any. There is nothing mysterious about proper law; it is based on reasonableness and common sense, and is harmonious with the Laws of God.

Check a law against this measure to see if it fits the mold of eternal truth and justice: say to yourself, "Would I be unwilling to have this law applied to myself or my closest friend?" If such application seems repugnant to you, if it seems unfair or unjust, then there is probably something wrong with that law. God knows that people's political standards are a reliable reflection of their moral standards and that the laws which they support are a good test of how they wish to be judged (Matthew 7:1). People can clearly see that taking money from some one by force is a crime when done by individuals, but they may fail to recognize the criminality of the same act when done by government.

For example, how would you feel if you had a particular "entitlement" and the government told you that you were authorized to collect a portion of this government handout from each of your neighbors? Let's suppose that your "entitlement" is food stamps: instead of giving you stamps, the government gives you a list of people from whom you are "authorized" to collect the money to buy the food. How would you feel if they told you it was all right to force your neighbors to give you the money? And every time you needed more food, you had to do it all over again? Would that be right? If not, why? Would changing the name of the collector make it right? Would it go against your grain to do so? How would your neighbors feel when you presented your "authorization"? How would you feel if your neighbors were coming to collect FROM YOU for some other "entitlement" program they were "authorized" to collect?

The Commercial Affidavit Process is a pre-common law process. It is also referred to as a "commercial law process," not to be confused with the [Uniform] Commercial Code and other manipulated and complicated rules and regulations. It is a pre-common law process because until there is a disagreement, there is no dispute. All that is being done is the establishment of claims and obligations. The purpose of the CAP is to make claims and determine if the accused agrees or not. If the Accused does not contest the claims there is no dispute to be adjudicated thus the appropriate damages are consensually agreed-upon. Thus it is pre-judicial. It may also be completely non-judicial if it is properly (composed of unrebuttable truth) and successfully implemented.

The term "commercial" as used herein refers to any dealings people have among themselves. Thus the "laws of commerce" refers to the just rules of procedure governing human relationships, the self-evident principles of right and wrong which are the foundation of the common law.

The foundation of COMMERCIAL LAW rests solidly on the bedrock of justice and common sense. These laws are so sound and so universally accepted that they cannot with impunity be overturned, overwritten or tampered with in any way: they are founded on eternal truths, needing no proof from anyone to justify their validity (i.e., self-evident); they are immutable; they provide equal justice to all parties of interest and thus are completely fair. That is the KEY to their power. All other just laws spring from this foundation. (By contrast, corrupted laws are mere shadows of these true and correct principles.)

Justice is delivered quickly, simply, fairly and conclusively with the Commercial Affidavit Process. This may be a terrible disappointment to wrong-doers who are confident they can get away with their illegitimate activities. Those who are subverting just laws, setting them aside, covering them up, creating shadow-law or colorable law and just generally using self-serving laws to subject and plunder their fellow man are in for a rude awakening. In summary, the Common Law grows out of the laws of commerce which themselves are based upon self-evident truths. Such truths are commonly expressed as maxims.

Maxims In Law
Maxims are as much a part of the laws of human relations (commerce) as a foundation is a part of a building. They are fundamental and immutable, having their basis in God's Laws. No one of sound mind argues against them. They are the bedrock of logic, of reason, of common sense, of truth. They are fundamental principles upon which all that is right, just and true is founded. They are the standards to measure the correctness of any course or action.

The word "maxim" is defined as an expression of an absolute truth or principle. Maxims are so powerful and unequivocal that they are the foundation of all human relationships. They have the power to cut to the heart of a matter in a heartbeat with reason, logic, and authority. They cover every topic imaginable and every aspect of our lives. They are not easily misunderstood, misapplied, or subverted; they are universally accepted for what they are: self-evident TRUTHS.

Maxims might be considered the redundant backup system when all else fails.

Anyone who is not schooled in the logic of maxims is easily confused for the want of such understanding. The legal profession has a vested interest in keeping the People ignorant of these principles: protecting the need for their "priestcraft." Priestcraft is "the craft of specialists who work to create the illusion their craft is too complex to be understood by anyone else."

It doesn't take a law degree to understand maxims.

The light of truth in maxims cannot be extinguished through the evil works and craftiness of men. They may be forgotten by many, intentionally concealed by some, but they still exist, no matter what, and they won't go away!

Below are maxims that surround the rightfulness and lawfulness of the Commercial Affidavit Process. This by no means is an exhaustive list:

Regarding Justice:

·         All are equal under the Law.

·         A matter must be expressed to be resolved.

·         Claims made without accountability are void.

·         Might does not make right.

·         Force, perjury or subornation of perjury, voids all.

·         Fraud vitiates the most solemn promise.

·         While the battle continues, he who first leaves the field or refuses to contend loses by default.

·         You are free to make any decision you wish, but you are never free to escape the consequences of your decisions.

·         A laborer is worthy of his hire.

·         Thou shalt not steal.

·         Notice to the agent is notice to the principal and notice to the principal is notice to the agent.

·         Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.

Regarding Truth:

·         Truth stands supreme.

·         Truth affects but cannot be affected.

·         Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.

·         Truth will out.

·         An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth.

·         An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.

·         Thou shall not bear false witness.

·         Ignorance is no respecter, it affects all without regard to position or title.

Regarding Sovereignty:

·         It is self-evident that all men are endowed by their creator (God) with equal and unalienable rights.

·         The created cannot be greater than its creator.

·         A man can give to another no more than he himself has.

·         A man may not with impunity infringe upon another man's rights.

·         The People are Sovereign.

·         In America the government is the servant of the "sovereign" People.

Regarding Power and Authority:

·         We cannot give to anyone or anything any power or authority we do not have.

Failed Legal System
Although the court system MAY have an essential part to play once the Commercial Affidavit has been served AND ANSWERED, that system is not and cannot be invoked until the charges in the affidavit have been answered by (1) acquiescence, (2) rebuttal or (3) default: until that point, THERE IS NO DISAGREEMENT TO ADJUDICATE. A disagreement could arise only from a rebuttal.

But even though it would be feasible to involve the court system to adjudicate such disagreement, no one seeking JUSTICE really would want to do so because the court system has become extremely costly, very slow and corrupted by the conniving convolutions of man-made rules and legalisms and by the natural inclinations of those who live from the legal system to promote the financial success of the legal business!

GUN CONTROL INSANITY

Special Front Sight Blog: Insanity of Gun Control

1 recipients

CC: recipientsYou More

BCC: recipientsYou

Hide Details

FROM:

• Ignatius Piazza

TO:

• hankkroll@yahoo.com

Message flagged

Sunday, July 22, 2012 3:05 PM

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here to view the website version.

Dr. Ignatius Piazza Sunday, July 22, 2012 Dear Henry Kroll, For obvious reasons, there will be no Front Sight Joke of the Week this weekend. Instead, I would like you to forward this e-mail to everyone you know and ask them to forward it to everyone they know. Politicians, city officials and businesses who support "Gun Free Zones" are killing us with their lunacy. Albert Einstein defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Well let's ask our elected officials, opinion leaders, the news media, and those businesses who support the insanity of gun control and "Gun Free Zones" how many more Americans are they willing to kill by continuing to disarm responsible, trained citizens WHO CAN STOP a deranged gunman BEFORE he can massacre disarmed and helpless citizens? How many MORE times are our elected officials going to pass gun control laws, enforce "Gun Free Zones" or consider signing an Arms Treaty to circumvent our cherished Second Amendment and expect a different result than what we received at the midnight showing of The Dark Knight Rises? It is INSANITY to believe that more gun control will make us safer. Criminals, terrorists, and the deranged DO NOT follow gun control laws. Never have and never will. Any politician, opinion leader, news pundit, or business owner who thinks otherwise is the poster child for Albert Einstein's definition of insanity. And while you are at it, ask the 50 or more who were wounded and the hundreds who feared for their lives in that "Gun Free Zone" theatre if they would have liked to have had a gun of their own to protect themselves and those around them when a madman walked right in and started shooting? NOBODY could stop him, because there wasn't another gun, a LIFE SAVING GUN, in that theatre! Ask your elected officials, opinion leaders, the news media, and those businesses who support the insanity of gun control and "Gun Free Zones" when they are going to wake up, get smart, look at the data, look at the statistics, look in the mirror and realize they are WRONG... DEAD WRONG about guns? When are they going to admit to themselves that they are KILLING Americans with ignorance and gun control schemes? It is no secret, due to so many real world examples that are readily available for everyone to see on the Internet, that when you have an armed, trained, responsible citizen in a public place EVERYONE IS SAFER and such murderous rampages as have occurred countless times in "Gun Free Zones" just can't happen. Here is just one of hundreds of such examples. You likely never saw this last week in your newspapers or on your local news because a responsible, armed, trained citizen was present and took care of the threat immediately. As a result it was a "non story" for the media. No blood, no tears, no wailing families who lost loved ones, no reason for reporters to look sad and reflective as they describe the carnage as many ways as they possible can for days and days, while playing the scene of the mass murder over and over and over again. Nope, there was no tragedy here. Just one responsible citizen with a gun taking care of a social problem and saving everyone around him BECAUSE HE WAS ARMED! Make sure EVERYONE sees this... Click To Play Video We still have a choice in America. We can either remain free and safe by throwing out our insane, elected officials who continue to support gun control in spite of all evidence that it is a dismal failure or we can sit on our hands, doing nothing and watch another criminal or nut case who could care less about gun control laws and “Gun Free Zones” kill another group of helpless, disarmed victims. We still have a choice in America. We can refuse to support businesses that enforce the insanity of "Gun Free Zones" and throw our support to the those businesses that recognize everyone is safer if responsible, trained employees and customers alike are allowed to carry a concealed weapon to protect themselves from those who attempt to terrorize and murder. You still have a choice in America. Exercise your choice and make sure everyone you know sees this e-mail blog and encourage each person you know to send it to everyone they know. There are currently 532,876 of you subscribing to my blog. If each of you exercise your choice and send this to everyone you know, asking each person you know to do the same, very quickly, everyone in American will know what you know, causing the harsh light of truth to expose the insanity of those who support gun control and enforce murderous "Gun Free Zones." I'm doing my part, please do your part. Together we truly make a positive difference. Sincerely, Dr. Ignatius Piazza Founder and Director Front Sight Firearms Training Institute 7975 Cameron Drive, #900 Windsor, CA 95492 http://www.frontsight.com info@frontsight.com 1.800.987.7719

Front Sight Firearms Training Institute is committed to the best email practices and has been accredited by the Institute for Spam and Internet Public Policy meeting the requirements for listing in their SuretyMail IADB Email Accreditation Program. Our IADB registration number is 2007043000543. For more information see http://www.SuretyMail.com If you received this newsletter in error and don't want to receive emails from us, please click here to unsubscribe. This Email Newsletter was sent to: hankkroll@yahoo.com on 7/22/2012 7:22:12 PM. ID#814753 UniqID#283164

Reply to:

Reply to info@frontsight.com

Reply to info@frontsight.com

Send

A GOOD IDEA

What do you all   think about this concept?


By Craig   Andresen

It’s going to be an ugly   campaign.
We all know it and we’re ready for it, but it’s going to be the   ugliest, nastiest and dirtiest campaign in history.

Why NOT take the early   lead?If Romneyt   takes this advice, it will send a clear message to the Republican   establishment that conservatives aren’t going to do business as usual any   more.  It would shake the establishment and pull together conservative   voters.

He would pull together the   conservative vote.

Here is a little something   else this would do… It would shake the Obama campaign to its   core.

As soon as the 1,144   delegates are in hand, WHOEVER garners them either at the convention or   before… put this into motion.

R ather than a leisurely   march toward a VP nominee or a surprise VP announcement like we got in 2008,   vet the possible VPs NOW and stand ready to announce the running mate in a   nationally televised press conference the day after the delegates are in   hand. 

Make the VP choice Allen   West.


Having Congressman West in   the VP slot makes him a TRIPLE THREAT and a VP who WILL redefine the   role.  Triple threat?  As the Vice President he would attend to the   regular duties and be a heartbeat away from the presidency.  As Vice   President, West would also act as a second Secretary of State in difficult   diplomatic negotiations.  AND… A Vice President West would work in   concert with the Secretary of Defense to realign our military and redefine its   role.
Triple threat!

Oh, but this is just the   START of the strategy!As soon as the Presidential   nominee has introduced West as the running mate… THE NOMINEE WOULD THEN   INTRODUCE HIS SECRETARY OF STATE NOMINEE… John Bolton.

As a former Ambassador to   the United Nations there is nobody with a better handle on the world’s issues   or more familiar with the players.  John Bolton is tough, straight   forward and not likely to appease ANYONE.Now, you have the nominee on   stage, the VP choice and the Secretary of State nominee… Let’s not stop   there.


Next to walk onto the   stage…Sarah   Palin… Nominee for Secretary of Energy.

Palin’s directive… Set us   on the path toward energy independence in 10 years.  Can you think of a   better choice?  Anyone more invested in that goal?  Anyone who is   more knowledgeable or adept?  I don’t.Can you feel the ground starting to   shake?

Next out of ts and   onto the stage… The nominee for Secretary of Defense.  Enter… General   David Petreaus.

As great as he was fighting   a Politically C orrect (PC) war, imagine what he’ll be like once he and West   have pressed the reset button on our rules of engagement.  In Petraeus we   will have a Secretary of Defense whose mission will be to win.    PERIOD!

Oh… I’m not done yet.    Next up… The nominee for Attorney General… Pam Bondi.

Bondi, Attorney General of   Florida, is a no nonsense fighter who has taken on the current administration   over Obamacare and WILL clean out the corruption rampant in that office   today.  Okay, where are we?  Who is now standing on the stage?    The Presidential nominee and Allen West… John Bolton… Sarah Palin…General   Petreaus and Pam Bondi.

How about a Secretary of   the Treasury?  We would need someone who has worked for YEARS in the tax   field who understands the overwhelming burden of tax codes and who has, for   years fought to restructure those codes.
Welcome Michele Bachmann to the   stage… The nominee for Secretary of the Treasury.

By now, fissures should be   opening in the ground, rumbling coming from the sky and the faint odor of   brimstone should be in the air.
We will need someone new with new ideas to   head up the Fed.  Please welcome Ron Paul.  Yes, I realize this,   under Paul, will be a temporary position; but somehow, I doubt Ron Paul wants   to make a career of running the Fed.

Secretary of the   Interior?  Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana … COME ON   DOWN!


And finally… We need   someone to head up the Department of Homeland Security.  We must have   someone who understands the issues we face.  Someone who has worked in   federal law enforcement.  Someone who won’t take any crap from   anybody.
Please… a round of applause for… Sheriff Joe   Arpaio,
Maricopa County ,   AZ.

Were the GOP nominee to do   this… call a press conference and make such an announcement… it would be   unprecedented.  Never before has a presidential nominee entered the   full-on campaign with a fully assembled team.

Can you IMAGINE the   shock-and-awe wave that would be sent through the Obama campaign were the GOP   nominee to do this?

Think about   it! 
From the word GO it would   be unlike any previous presidential campaign.

Instead of simply Nominee X   against Obama we would have Nominee X vs Obama…
Congressman Allen West   vs
. Joe Biden…
John Bolton   vs. Hillary Clinton…
Sarah   Palin vs. Stephen Chu…
General   Petreaus vs. Leon Panetta…
Pam Bondi   vs. Eric Holder…
Michele   Bachmann vs. Tim Geitner…
Ron Paul   vs. Ben Bernake…
Bobby   Jindal vs. Ken Salazar…
Sheriff Joe   Arpaio vs. Janet   Napolitano.

Think about that… Let that   sink in… All campaigning at once.  There would be no way out for Obama as   each and every key player on his team would be exposed and held to account   from the word GO.

It would be a full on   frontal assault and Obama would have no place to hide.


By adopting this proposal,   Obama would be forced into a pot of boiling water or into the fire.  If   he tried to rid himself of baggage he would be exposed as running from his own   record and that of the very people he’s been standing behind for political   expediency.  If he stays with them, he would be forced to defend   them.  Boiling water or a raging fire… his choice.


It’s bold, brash and   completely against the establishment business as usual strategy.  It’s   earth shaking!

An entire assembled team of   key cabinet positions… Each one a pitbull on a T-Bone… hammering their liberal   counterparts on every issue, every day, from the word GO, untilNovember 6th,   2012.

We will have to play the   cards we’re dealt with the GOP nominee, but tell me THIS strategy wouldn’t go   a LONG way toward bringing the conservative voters together.  Tell me   this strategy wouldn’t pull in and appeal to independents.

As voters, using THIS   strategy, we would be voting for the whole team rather than just the standard,   business-as-usual Presidential 2-person ticket. 

SHARE THIS ARTICLE FAR AND   WIDE!!!

conclusions.

For God and   Country,


Lynn Childs,   Secretary, Tea Party   Chairman,   Federal   Watchdog/Webmaster                                                 


Coastal   Carolina Taxpayers Association (CCTA)


Serving Craven,   Carteret, Pamlico and Jones Counties ,   NC


Cell:    252-402-0333
lynn.ccta@gmail.com      http://www.cctaxpayers.com                                                                 


 CHECK US OUT ON FACEBOOK:    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=141672053490


CCTA BLOG:  http://cctaxpayers.blogspot.com/  


Read Lynn's Daily News Digest   at:    http://cctaxpayers.blogspot.com/p/lynns.html

Note:  CCTA is a non partisan   organization.  We do not endorse any particular candidate or   political party.  News items are presented for you the reader to help you   become informed and reach your own 

Home owners suing banks and their offshore havens...

Subject:


Home Owners Sue All Bank Servicers and Their Offshore Havens; US Attorneys General Jump On The Lieborgate Bandwagon; 900,000+ Lawsuits To Follow, And What Happens Next?

Date:


Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:10:06 -0500

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/home-owners-across-the-nation-sue-all-bank-servicers-and-their-offshore-havens-spire-law-officially-announces-filing-of-landmark-lawsuit-2012-04-23

Home Owners Across the Nation Sue All Bank Servicers and Their Offshore   Havens; Spire Law Officially Announces Filing of Landmark Lawsuit


Largest International Money Laundering Network in History Formed During   Obama Administration; U.S. Banks' Theft of Home Owners' Money Laundered   Through Cayman Islands, Isle of Man and Numerous Offshore-Based Affiliates




NEW YORK, NY, Apr 23, 2012 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- In a lawsuit alleged   to involve the largest money laundering network in United States history,   Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owners across the Country -- has   filed a mass tort action in the Supreme Court of New York, County of Kings.   Home owners across the country have sued every major bank servicer and their   subsidiaries -- formed in countries known as havens for money laundering such   as the Cayman Islands, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg and Malaysia -- alleging   that while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan   modifications for home owners, it was privately ratifying the formation of   these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State   and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign   companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank,   Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole   hundreds of millions of dollars of home owners' money during the last decade   and then laundered it through offshore companies. The complaint, Index No.   500827, was filed by Spire Law Group, LLP, and several of the Firm's   affiliates and partners across the United States.


Far from being ambiguous, this is a complaint that "names names." Indeed,   the lawsuit identifies specific companies and the offshore countries used in   this enormous money laundering scheme. Federally Chartered Banks' theft of   money and their utilization of offshore tax haven subsidiaries represent   potential FDIC violations, violations of New York law, and countless other   legal wrongdoings under state and federal law.


"The laundering of trillions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money -- and the   wrongful taking of the homes of those taxpayers -- was known by the   Administration and expressly supported by it. Evidence uncovered by the   plaintiffs revealed that the Administration ignored its own agencies' reports   -- and reports from the Department of Homeland Security -- about this   situation, dating as far back as 2010. Worse, the Administration purported to   endorse a 'national bank settlement' without disclosing or having any public   discourse whatsoever about the thousands of foreign tax havens now wholly   owned by our nation's banks. Fortunately, no home owner is bound to enter into   this fraudulent bank settlement," stated Eric J. Wittenberg of Columbus, Ohio   -- a noted trial lawyer, author and student of US history -- on behalf of   plaintiffs in the case.


The suing home owners reveal how deeply they were defrauded by bank and   governmental corruption -- and are suing for conversion, larceny, fraud, and   for violations of other provisions of New York state law committed by these   financial institutions and their offshore counterparts.


This lawsuit explains why loans were, in general, rarely modified after   2009. It explains why the entire bank crisis worsened, crippling the economy   of the United States and stripping countless home owners of their piece of the   American dream. It is indeed a fact that the Administration has spent far more   money stopping bank investigations, than they have investigating them. When   the Administration's agencies (like the FDIC) blew the whistle, their reports   were ignored.


The case is styled Abeel v. Bank of America, etc., et al. -- and includes   such entities as ML Banderia Cayman BRL Inc., ML Whitby Luxembourg S.A.R.L.   and J.P Morgan Asset Management Luxembourg S.A. -- as well as hundreds of   other obscure offshore entities somehow "owned" by federally chartered banks   and formed "under the nose" of the Administration and the FDIC.


Commenting further on the case, Mr. Wittenberg stated: "As if it is not bad   enough that banks collect money and do not credit it to homeowners' accounts,   and as if it is not bad enough that those banks then foreclose when they know   they do not have a legally enforceable interest in the realty, we now learn   that they have been operating under unbridled free reign given by the   Administration and some states' Attorneys General in formulating this   international money laundering network. Now that the light of day has been   shined on it, I believe we can all rest assured that the beginning of the end   of the bank crisis has arrived."


All United States home owners may have the right to bring a lawsuit of this   kind if they paid money to a national bank servicer during the years 2003   through 2009.


One lawyer impacted by the corruption -- Mitchell J. Stein, who formerly   represented the FDIC, the RTC and the FSLIC during the Savings and Loan   scandal of the 1990s, and who predicted all of the foregoing in open court two   years ago -- commented: "Two years ago, I remarked in open court to a Los   Angeles Superior Court Judge, as well as to legislators including Senator   Dianne Feinstein's office during a multitude of in-person meetings, that the   ongoing violations of the Patriot Act by these financial institutions was   outrageous and a breach of the public trust of unprecedented proportions,"   said Stein.


"The size and scope of this misconduct -- stretching to far-away islands   never before having standing as approved United States Bank affiliates -- is   remarkable and emblematic of what we have seen," he continued. "The bank   crisis represents the height of corruption and brazen behavior where our   historically trusted financial institutions have no qualms about breaking the   law, because they have the Administration behind them. Banks do well enough   when they operate lawfully without needing to be permitted to operate as   criminal enterprises that steal money from United States citizens."


Additional plaintiffs' counsel Nicholas M. Moccia commented: "Having been   in the trenches of the bank crisis for years, I always knew that the   misconduct was being conducted by a network. When I started litigating against   banks, however, I could have never imagined that it would be this extensive. I   look forward to taking discovery of these thousands of obscure foreign   entities and to obtaining for homeowners their constitutionally entitled   injuries for this international ring of theft and deception."


Comments were requested from the Attorney Generals' offices in NY, CA, NV,   and MA and the White House, but no comment was provided.


About Spire Law Group


Spire Law Group, LLP is a national law firm whose motto is "the public   should be protected -- at all costs -- from corruption in whatever form it   presents itself." The Firm is comprised of lawyers nationally with more than   250-years of experience in a span of matters ranging from representing large   corporations and wealthy individuals, to also representing the masses. The   Firm is at the front lines litigating against government officials, banks,   defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption   was enabled and perpetrated.

        
        Contact: 
        James N. Fiedler, Esq. 
        Managing Partner 



[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/us-attorneys-general-jump-lieborgate-bandwagon-900000-lawsuits-follow


US Attorneys General Jump On The Lieborgate Bandwagon;   900,000+ Lawsuits To Follow, And What Happens Next?

Submitted by Tyler Durden on   07/11/2012 21:00 -0400


The   second Barclays announced its $450 million Libor settlement, it was all over -   the lawyers smelled not only blood, but what may be the biggest plaintiff   feeding frenzy of all time. Which is why it was only a matter of time:   "State attorneys general are jumping into the widening scandal over   whether banks tried to manipulate benchmark international lending rates, a   move that could open a new front against the top global banks. A   handful of state attorneys general said they are looking into whether they   have jurisdiction over the banks, and are starting preliminary discussions to   determine what kind of impact the conduct involving the Libor rate may have   had in their states."


From   Reuters:



"Our     office is aware of the allegations around the manipulation of the Libor, and     we are working with other state agencies to determine whether Massachusetts     has suffered any losses as a result," a spokesman for Massachusetts Attorney     General Martha Coakley said. A spokesman for Florida Attorney General Pam     Bondi said his office is aware of the recent settlement reached by British     bank Barclays with U.S. and UK authorities and "will look at the case to the     extent that our office might have any jurisdiction in the matter."





A     spokeswoman for the Massachusetts transportation authority, MassDOT, said     the agency "is actively investigating its portfolio for the purpose of     determining if it was underpaid on its bonds due to the brewing Libor     situation," as are many other issuers of debt whose rate is governed by     Libor.





Lawyers     for several states have had early discussions about whether they might pool     investigative resources and launch a broader, multi-state effort, but no     formal consortium has been established yet, people familiar with the     discussions said. New York might be expected to lead such an effort, since     most of the banks' U.S. operations are based there. A spokesman for the New     York attorney general declined comment on whether the issue is being looked     at.





Some     municipalities, including the city of Baltimore, and funds including the     Frankfurt-based Metzler Investment GmbH, which manages 47 billion euros ($59     billion) in assets, have already sued more than a dozen banks, arguing they     were bilked of potentially billions of dollars.


How   many potential lawsuits are we talking about here? Quite a bit in fact as the   FT   explains:



There     are at least 900,000 outstanding US home loans indexed to Libor that were     originated from 2005 to 2009, the period the key lending gauge may     have been rigged, investigators have said. Those mortgages carry an     unpaid principal balance of $275bn, according to the Office of the     Comptroller of the Currency, a bank regulator.


Also,   as explained here before, not only is this a legal bonanza, but it will be a   political feast for the Congressional circus to earn numerous C-SPAN brownie   points.



“I     think the US government should be just as aggressive in getting to the     bottom of this scandal as the United Kingdom has been,” said Senator Sherrod     Brown, chair of the bank regulatory subcommittee on the Senate banking     committee. 


“This     was not isolated to London, but affected tens of millions of investors,     borrowers and taxpayers in our country as well,” Mr Brown   added.


What   does the above mean?


1)   Starting today and going forward, there will be numerous essays, "analyses"   and white papers, all of which will try to estimate (some on a paid basis) the   damages and impact of the Libor manipulation that took place at least in the   period under discussion 2005-2009. All of these will be absolutely   wrong, as nobody has any clear idea of how the   cumulative impact of the Libor rate, which may have been pushed below either   lower or higher depending on how it suited a given BBA-member bank, over a   period of years will have impacted hundreds of trillions in partially   offsetting notional securities. Therefore, while one day it may have led to   impairments, another day it would benefit the end-holder of a given   interest-rate sensitive product. But they will try. And the bigger the number,   the better, which leads us to...


2)   The lawyers will crawl out of the woodwork like worms after a torrential   downpour, and will all be willing to work on contingency, telling potential   clients they are owed thousands, nay, millions based on such and such   analysis. All they need is to have held a mortgage, or a credit card, or any   variable interest liability in the 4 years in question. And to sign the dotted   line.


3)   The resulting lawsuits, most of which in class action format, will be of   gargantuan proportions, simply to encourage settlement, as ongoing litigation   will easily destroy the financial system. The litigation reserves at the TBTF   banks will explode and will cause years of EPS writedowns. But at least they   will be one-time charges, so the stocks don't get crushed too much.   That said, forget any growth out of the banking sector, and certainly the 16   BBA member banks, all of whom are about to be sued to smithereens in civil   suits as more and more banks step up and settle to avoid criminal   prosecution.


4)   The biggest irony is that the torrent of upcoming suits will be in effect   targeting none other than the Fed. Because while banks which all were   massively levered to even a one basis point move in Libor were very sensitive   to the smallest variations in 3 month USD libor, end-clients who did not have   this leverage were far less impaired. But that doesn't matter: after all the   same clients were impaired through gross borderline criminal negligence which   is all that matters in a court of law (assuming the honorable judge John   Roberts is not presiding pro hac vice). Thus the entity that will be sued by   proxy is the Federal Reserve, whose Federal Funds rate is really the setter   for the baseline Libor rate. Note the chart below which shows that over the   past decade, the 3M USD Libor and the Fed Funds rate were virtually   interchangeable:


Yet   while it was the Fed's decisions at the bottom of it all, unless someone   implicates the Fed or the BOE further, both will get away scott free: after   all what they do is public policy, for the public good and to defend their   various appointed mandates. And neither pushed banks to manipulate their rates   (even if both were well aware there was gambling going on here), or so they   claim, even when presented with evidence to the contrary.


What   will really happen, is that the private banks, having been bailed out by the   central banks at the taxpayers' dime, will now serve as a buffer to protect   these same institutions from rising popular anger, not just at Lieborgate, but   Robosigning, Robosettlement, CDOs, rehypothecation, High Frequency Trading,   toxic assets marked-to-unicorns, the end of Mark-to-Market, ZIRP, NIRP, expert   networks, insider trading, MF Global, and countless other examples of what   happens when financial fraud is let loose with no fear of consequence in a   Bernanke Put world.


As   a result, the status quo will literally buy itself a few more years as it   delays the tipping point by any means necessary, in the process kicking back a   little to politicians, lawyers, and the general public in exchange for a few   years of subpar earnings for bank shareholders that should have been wiped out   back in 2008 anyway. And everyone will be happy.


That's   how Lieborgate will play   out.

Average:  4.916665

VALE OF DOLLAR and HUMAN BONDAGE

Birth Certificate & Credit                                                                                    EXHIBIT A

I. Background and framework.
The government founded by the original Constitution, 1787, is no longer operational. Instead, what is called the “Government of the United States” is a bankrupt, private corporation, owned, underwritten, and functioning in commerce as a front for the international bankers and the Powers-That-Be with which said bankers are allied. The entire institution, i.e., “US Inc.,” is private (not free) enterprise administering the ongoing business and political ends of the actual owners. In this current scenario, every action of US Inc. is a commercial transaction by and between fictitious entities all transpiring for the purpose of furthering the economic and political objectives of the alleged creditors.

This situation arose from the borrowing by USA from European central banks and owing the unpaid indebtedness to the Crown from the original joint-venture agreement between the Colonies (which are corporations of the Crown) and the Crown per se. It appears as though USA has been bankrupt from inception, i.e., from 1788, and the Constitution was drafted to “re-constitute” the unpaid debt and structure an organization for functioning in bankruptcy.

The Civil War was staged and financed by the bankers and the Crown to conquer the nation by engaging in the timeless strategy of “divide and conquer.” Pitting North against South resulted in the dissolution of the de jure Federal government of the organic Constitution. The States were drawn into the Central Government, as were—progressively—the people directly, with the whole conglomerate operating through the new Federal Government in the Emergency War Powers of 12 Stat. 319, 1861, under the “law of necessity.”

Thus, the “Government” functions under mere “color (appearance only) of government” with the President as acting dictator on behalf of the bankers under the President’s capacity as Commander in Chief of the Military. I.e., when the seven (7) Southern States walked out of Congress on March 27, 1861, Congress—and, indeed, the entire de jure Government of USA under the original Constitution—dissolved based on absence of a Congressional quorum to adjourn and re-convene. The result is that the actual winner of the Civil War was neither the North nor the South, but the bankers who owned the new Federal Government that defeated both North and South and absorbed and subserved the States into itself.

In accordance, inter alia, with the Limited Liability Act of 1851, the Emergency War Powers, 12 Stat. 319, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the constitutional provision allowing Congress authority to pass any law Congress wishes within the ten-mile square territory of Washington, DC, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, the 14th Amendment was proclaimed ratified in 1868. Within that framework, on February 21st, 1871, Congress passed the District of Columbia Organic Act, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, 16 Stat. 419, “An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” which act was revised in 1874 and reorganized June 8, 1878, 20 Stat. 102, Chap 180, 45th Congress, 2nd Session, “An Act providing a permanent form of government for the District of Columbia.” This “government” is a private corporation now known and copyrighted by such names as “The United States Government,” “United States,” “U.S.,” “U.S.A.,” etc., all referenced herein as “US Inc.”

It is important to understand that US Inc. is not a country, but a corporation—and indeed a bankrupt corporation operating under color of government as the front and device for administering the conquest in law and commerce of the United States of America. The 14th Amendment and US Inc. are all private international law in the admiralty-maritime/Law Merchant of Roman Civil Law.

The 14th Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” This amendment allows US Inc. to have complete jurisdiction over “citizens,” i.e., corporate subsets of US Inc., which the de jure federal government did not and could not possess. The 14th Amendment also states (section 4): “The validity of the public debt of the United States authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion [per 12 Stat. 319], shall not be questioned.”

The 14th Amendment established the framework for complete conquest and absorption of the country, rendering the people permanent debtors, indentured servants in involuntary servitude, peonage, and also enemies of the government as a result, in accordance with 12 State 319, any aspect of US Inc. may summarily confiscate property in rem without necessity for judicial process whenever any citizen asserts a challenge to the laws of the United States, i.e., US Inc.

Remnants of the de jure Government remained after the 14th Amendment, however, based on such things as the continuing circulation of gold and silver coin (the money of sovereigns) and the fact that Senators were still elected to the Senate by Electors of the States rather than by direct, popular vote. Senators became elected by direct vote of the people with the passage of the 17th Amendment. The Civil War had forced each sovereign State to pledge its assets as collateral and become surety and a cosigner for the defaulted Federal Government’s debt to the bankers. This procedure was repeated in the 1933 bankruptcy, at which time gold and silver coin (substance) were outlawed as money for citizens of the United States (fictions). Inability to use gold and silver as money solidified the bankruptcy of US Inc. and foreclosed every such citizen from accessing real money for use in payment of debts, thereby denying access to sovereignty. US Inc. is completely devoid of rights, substance, standing in law, and sovereign character, as is every citizen of the United States.

II. The creation and nature of the strawman.
Because additional pledging of assets was required to enable the now-bankrupt corporation to continue to operate when civilly dead, the governors of all the States met to discuss the “emergency” declared by Franklin D. Roosevelt, i.e., the bankruptcy, and how to reorganize US Inc. to continue functioning when bankrupt by means of insurance underwriting by the creditors.

The governors of the States made a “pledge” to US Inc. to underwrite the bankruptcy through a grand scheme of limited-liability insurance. The people, through their “Certificates of Live Birth,” a/k/a “newborn identification,” were registered in the office of the county recorder by “registered agents” of the government such as the “registered doctor” and “registered nurse,” and were thereby established as property of the State. Remember “register” derives from “regis,” meaning “king,” whereby everything “registered” is there to record and keep track of the king’s property.

The newborn identification is identified with, and attaches to, the flesh-and-blood being by taking a drop of blood and the print (usually footprint) of the baby and applying them to the newborn identification. Once that certificate is registered, it is recorded as a “certificate of title,” as it were, to the real being. Since the point is to be able to enslave the child and render him a surety for the debt of the bankrupt US Inc., it makes no difference who or what the baby is. Everyone becomes classified as “fungible[1] goods,” like interchangeable bales of cotton.

The parents did not understand what was happening, so the process was thereby fraud based on deceit and non-disclosure. Obviously, with full disclosure of the terms and conditions involved in the alleged contract, no one would agree to go along with it. The agents of the government perpetrate a fraudulent transfer by registering the name, blood, and footprint of beings that is birthed by the living woman and not the corporate state (which can generate only more legal fictions, not real beings). This process amounts to theft of the real being by filing a piece of paper. The State did not create the name from which the all-caps strawman was derived, only colored the name into a form they could use. The name in upper- and lower-case letters pertains to the real being, while the all-caps strawman is a legal fiction used as credit against which to borrow at the expense of the life-force of the living being to which the name and registered newborn identification allegedly relates.

When the Governors of the States, at the Conference of Governors of March 6, 1933, pledged as State-registered assets the newborn identifications of those born in the State to the federal bankruptcy, the people’s energy was established as the collateral for backing the whole operation—the entire national debt. Since the States, being fictitious, commercial entities with no capacity to recognize real beings, could not pledge private, living people or their property, a “bridge” was needed between the living people and the bankruptcy of the federal US Inc. To accomplish this result the strawman was created by the Department of Commerce in Washington, DC, to function as a shill to operate out front publicly in place of the people. The scheme had to be so clever that the people would agree to operate as surety for the debts, charges, and obligations of the strawman without knowing what was happening to them, who did it, what they were agreeing to, or how the whole process worked.

The birth certificate with the all-caps name created by the U.S. Department of Commerce is a certificate of equity interest, akin to a “pink slip”[2] pertaining to a vehicle, and possibly a bill of lading, a document of bailment, which ships the cargo (new and original birth certificate) into the special maritime jurisdiction of the creditors to operate as collateral to back the bankruptcy reorganization of US Inc. via the Governor’s pledge. The all-caps strawman is thereby “birthed”—like a vessel—into the private, international-law special maritime jurisdiction of the bankers, et al, as a “citizen of the United States born [birthed] or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

By this scheme the living people assumed the roll of guarantor, accommodation party, and surety for the legal fiction that functions for the benefit and enrichment of the creditors. In this scenario it is the strawman, not the living being, that operates throughout the entirety of today’s law and commerce. One need only look at the Social Security Card, School Records, Passports, Driver’s Licenses, credit cards, utility bills, etc., all of which are always in all-capital letters—just as are gravestones of dead people all over the world and the parties to a dispute on the caption of a court brief—to see the ubiquitous use of the strawman in today’s commercial and legal world.

A “surety” is defined as “the one who is responsible to pay.” The real man is the surety and liable by contract to pay for the debts and obligations of the strawman, even though the real man is not, nor does he own, nor does he receive title to, anything purchased or accomplished by use of the strawman. The strawman is owned by US Inc. and the banks that purchased bonds issued by the Treasury against the strawman (as credit).

As stated, US Inc. is bankrupt, and has been since 1933. US Inc. has no gold or silver to pay any debts and is civilly dead. Having neither possession, nor right of possession, nor legal capacity to use gold and silver, i.e., “lawful money,” the only asset left to finance the continued operation of the bankrupt US Inc., i.e., the “government,” was the people, who were hypothecated as the credit/collateral to finance the bankruptcy US Inc. uses the substance and labor of the people to finance its entire operation. reorganization and insurance underwriting.

The scenario is extremely sophisticated, resulting in the operation of a vast and pervasive administration of legalized peonage, slavery, permanent indentured servitude, and collectivism (communism) wherein the people have forfeited all standing in law and are “dead to rights.” The Powers-That-Be borrow against your life, rights, and labor to finance their administration of the system they use to exploit, plunder, and dominate you, all under the pretext/presumption that they are acting as your agents to fulfill your own requests. In this scheme one is punished when one fails to pay or obey.

The sequence of steps involved in creating the existing system, in accordance with the best research to date (resulting from the efforts of many devoted people), is as follows in the United States:

1. A living, flesh-and-blood baby is born from its mother’s womb.

2. The legal/commercial system, existing and functioning entirely in the abstract realm of words, contracts, legal persons, corporate entities, laws, symbols, ideas, commerce, private international law, etc., (which constitutes the “matrix”) cannot see, recognize, or deal directly with the real world, including real people. The system itself is imaginary, while the real world is genuine and substantive. Consequently, the system deals only with documents and matters in the abstract realm that form, by presumption, ratified implied contract attached to the real world by “operation of law” and the tacit consent of the people.

3. Just after birth, the involved doctors and hospitals have the mother sign a “birth certificate,” i.e., a “certificate of live birth,” without telling the mother (and undoubtedly without themselves knowing the truth) that by so doing she and the doctor are criminally informing on her newborn baby as an enemy of the state in accordance with the War Powers and turning the baby over to the bankers as chattel property and slave, pledging the baby’s life-energy and labor in perpetuity as the collateral for borrowing into existence all “currency” (debt-paper) that passes as “money” today.[3]

4. The original birth certificate, a “Certificate of Live Birth,” constitutes, as it were, a “certificate of title” to the real being, and is in essence the equivalent of a “manufacturer’s statement (or certificate) of origin,” i.e., “MSO” or “MCO,” which is created upon manufacturing an automobile and constitutes title to the vehicle.

5. Just as in the case of a car, anything being “registered” in the legal system is established on the record as property of the king. The key here is "registered," a word deriving from “regis,” meaning “king,” whereby everything “registered” is recorded as the king’s property.

6. The sequence of steps concerning the birth certificate appears to be as follows:
a. After registration of the Certificate of Live Birth in the office of the county recorder, the county recorder makes a certified, true copy or microfilm, retains it, and sends the original to the Department of Commerce in the State.
b. As in the case of the county recorder, the State Department of Commerce makes a certified, true copy or microfilm, retains it, and sends the original to the Department of Commerce of the Federal Government in Washington, DC.
c. The Department of Commerce in Washington then makes a certified, true copy and, in addition, creates a new document, constituting a “certificate of equity interest,” which is labeled “Birth Certificate.” This birth certificate, however, has the child’s name in all-capital letters, unlike the original birth certificate filed in the county recorder on which the name was in upper- and lower-case letters.
d. The Department of Commerce in Washington, DC then forwards the originals of both documents to the record repository in such locations as The Hague, for holding on behalf of the international banks, e.g., the “World Bank,” the “Bank of International Settlement,” IMF, et al. There the documents remain on deposit as the collateral/asset for hypothecating into existence the credit that finances the underwriting of the world’s bankrupt governments.

7. By this means, the people become the "utility" for the "transmission" of energy from reality into the fictitious, colorable realm of international commerce.


The private, international law that governs the legal/commercial system today is the Uniform Commercial Code, which is established as the law of the land in the United States in Public Laws 88-243 and 88-244. The UCC is private, not public, law, and is copyrighted by Unidroit, an Italian corporation out of the Vatican.
Now the people, via their all-caps names, are classified as “human resources,” and "goods" under the Uniform Commercial Code—see Section 2-105(1) and 9-105(1) in which animals, i.e. humans and their unborn offspring, become "goods" saleable in commerce.

The Department of Treasury issues bonds on the birth certificates, which are sold through securities exchanges and purchased—by extending credit on the bank’s books—by the Federal Reserve Bank, which uses the bonds as “reserves” for creating credit in the fractional reserve system. The people’s labor becomes the collateral for issuing Federal Reserve Notes or some other form of "debt obligation" (see 18 USC §411). The bonds are held in trust for the purchaser, now the “secured party” and holder in due course, at the Resolution Trust Company at 55 Water Street, in New York City, about two blocks down the street from the Federal Reserve. It is a high-rise office building with a sign that reads, "The Tower of Power."

After the New Deal the all-caps name, hereinafter “strawman,” is what the system deals with, since it cannot interface directly with real beings. The real being, however, is presumed to have ratified the deal, agreed to the pledge, by the three (3) means for signifying ratification of implied contracts[4].

Thereafter, the system functions on the basis of possessing complete authority to do anything it wishes with the strawman, which is the system’s own creation and property and does not belong to the living being to whom the strawman purportedly pertains.

This scheme of legal/commercial peonage and slavery is outside the Constitution, which does not apply in any matters concerning the resulting process. The system functions in the realm of private contract, private international law, in international commerce, i.e., the private international law of the private, colorable Law Merchant, not within the direct purview of the Constitution, which merely sanctifies the operational right to contract.

Thereafter, every time the real being signs his name on any legal/commercial document, he is creating more debt-currency into existence, signing as the “surety,” or “accommodation party” per the Uniform commercial Code §3-415. He is also placing title to whatever property is involved in the hands of the bond-holder.
In this scenario, the "name," i.e., strawman, is credit and is a constructive trust (trust created by operation of law, i.e., fiat) holding all the real assets, i.e., “sweat-equity,” created by the labor of the real being. The right to the use has been separated from the title. The "strawman" holds the title and belongs to the bond-holder, not the real being. The flesh-and-blood man or women has only naked possession with a limited "right" to use the thing, such as one’s body, possessions, or land. Such illusion of ownership and right is essential to maintain the sting on an ongoing basis, keep the people from completely rebelling if their status as slaves was self-evident, and fostering more enthusiasm to work and produce by thinking that they are doing so for their own benefit rather than for the enrichment and power of their owners/masters/rulers.

When the strawman violates some rule or statute, such as is presumed whenever the strawman receives a traffic ticket, the flesh-and-blood being must appear at an arraignment and admit that he is the surety and accommodation party for the strawman, and thereby agree to provide the "energy" necessary for providing whatever fine or penalty is deemed due and payable. The real being has re-confirmed the contract of implied unification of the real being with the strawman by saying “here” when the strawman’s name is called in the idem sonans, i.e., “same-sound,” tribunal.[5] This is why it essential for the operation of the system that people "voluntarily give" their names to the court. The “Defendant” in the action is the strawman, not the real being. The real being confirms that he is, or may legally be treated the same as, the Defendant. Through this process one has entered through a door over which is inscribed: “Abandon hope all ye who enter here.”
It is now clear that the strawman is:

1. A “nom de guerre,” meaning “a name of war,” whereby the strawman is regarded as being in a state of “insurrection or rebellion” per Section 4 of the 14th Amendment, 12 Stat. 319, and the Trading With The Enemy Act;
2. A “stramineus homo,” or “strawman,” the legal and commercial consequences/aspects of which are that it is a permanent debtor in legal incapacity, a dead estate;
3. An artificial entity owned by the secured party who bought into the bond placed on the market by the U.S. Treasury.

It is important to remember that the strawman is not the property of the real being. The living man or woman is merely the surety (sucker) providing the labor, life-energy, and sweat-equity for the fiction owned by US Inc. and the bond-holder. The strawman is the front that enables the secured party to act in legal/commercial dealings without revealing his identity, and to deceive the real being, who signs in all matters as a surety and accommodation party, into thinking that the real being is doing something for himself rather than his owners/masters. Everything the real being signs on behalf of the strawman places title to whatever property is involved into the hands of the United States and the bond owner, i.e., the secured party over the strawman.
Do we have a claim on our all-caps strawman? The short answer is, “yes,” but only after we assert that claim properly. Otherwise, the presumption remains that US Inc. and the owners of the bondholders own the strawman.

The foundation of our claim is that they did not originate the strawman, but merely altered the original name by changing the upper- and lower-case name into a “same sounding” name spelled in all capital letters without full disclosure. That all-caps name is used to finance the system of power and self-enrichment of US Inc. and its owners at the expense of the enslavement of the people. They do not possess any authority to use the name based on the unlawful object of intent to perpetrate the scheme to reduce the people to slavery and peonage by engaging in fraudulent concealment and a mountain of other crimes. In addition, it is the living being to whom the name refers that provides the labor, substance, and life-force that gives value to the strawman, and thereby authorizes the real being to claim superior title to it. Those who expropriate the output of others for their own unjust enrichment, subjugate the populace, and bring about the ruin of those from whom they steal the rights, life force, labor, and wealth, have no legitimate grounds to assert a claim of superior title, either in law, equity, or commerce.

There is a sequence of steps that must be done to become free of the bondage-system that now enslaves mankind and regain lost freedom and independence. The system has not, to say the least, been forthcoming in educating the people concerning the true legal and commercial situation to which virtually everyone in the world is now subject.[6] A mother having given birth to her baby is not informed that by allowing her child’s birth certificate to be registered she is, for instance:

1. Informing on the baby criminally and declaring her newborn infant to be an enemy of the state with no rights;

2. Consigning the child to permanent slavery, peonage, and indentured servitude;

3. Declaring her baby to be fungible goods and the chattel property of the bankers and world powers.

If full disclosure, good faith, and genuine meeting of the minds prevailed, as is required for any purported contract to be an actual, bona fide contract enforceable at law, and the people knew the truth, the banks and governments of the world would be out of business. It has been a long, dangerous, often ruinous road—involving the blood, sweat, tears, property, and even the lives of many people—to uncover the nature of the clever scheme. Such people, most of whom not only love freedom and truth but principle for its own sake, have not been willing to remain in ignorance and bondage, and have diverted their lives to the task of understanding the nature of the system and discerning ways to become free of it.
Once you have control of the name you can use it for your benefit instead of the system using the name to use you for its benefit without your knowing what is happening.

[1] Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, defines “fungibles” as: “Goods which are identical with others of the same nature, such as grain and oil.” See also UCC 1-201(17).

[2] A “pink slip” pertaining to a motor vehicle is not title, but merely evidence of title. It indicates that title exists somewhere. Actual title to the vehicle consists of the original Manufacturer’s Statement (or Certificate) of Origin, the “MSO,” which, upon purchase of a new car, is sent to the State Department of Motor Vehicles. Whoever owns the MSO owns the vehicle, whereby one who buys a new car without taking possession of the MSO gifts his new purchase to the State, which may thereafter require that anyone using its property comply with all of the requirements of use, such as possessing a valid driver license, carrying insurance, complying with all the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Code, etc. Upon receipt of the MSO, however, the Department of Motor Vehicles micro-films, files, and then destroys the MSO. Inasmuch as only the original of a document counts in commerce, once the original MSO is destroyed, no proof of actual ownership exists. The microfilm is hearsay. This provides a forum for executing a new MSO and establishing ownership of the car in another jurisdiction where one’s ownership of the substance, i.e., the actual car, is acknowledged.

[3] On its face, this is a most startling statement, which requires clarification. The original Emergency War Powers of 1861, 12 Stat. 319, not only has never been repealed, but is the foundation for subsequent acts, such as the Trading With the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, and the Amendatory Act thereto, i.e., the “Banking Relief Act,” of March 9, 1933, just after Roosevelt's Inauguration. The Amendatory Act (48 Stat. 1) amended the Trading With the Enemy Act, and was passed by Congress at a time when the United States was not in a shooting war with any foreign foe. The American people were (unknowingly) at war with their conquerors, the Banksters, who had defeated the country by the treachery of their something-for-nothing paper-money banking swindle and other deceits, rather than force of arms. The pen can indeed be mightier (and more suicidal for those who mindlessly use it) than the sword. This amended version of the Trading With the Enemy Act provided "legal" justification for dramatic increases in the power, scope, and authority of the U.S. Government (now owned by and an administrative agency of the bankers).

The original Trading with the Enemy Act excluded citizens of the United States from being treated as the enemy when involved in transactions wholly within the United States. The Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, however, expressly included the people of the United States as the enemy by insertion of the following text: "...by any person within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 1(b).
By operation of law the American people became the "enemy" of the private Federal Reserve/IMF Creditors in bankruptcy, who have thereafter been administering their prize/conquest through their alter ego and front, the "U.S. Government." To regulate and control their slaves/chattel property, they rendered (under color of law and government) all intercourse illegal amongst the American people without obtaining permission through licensing. To travel, a driver's license is required; to open a business requires a business license (not to mention additional and on-going mountains of "red tape"); to work for another one must obtain licensing through a Social Security card.

To be "within the United States" one must merely be a "person" or "resident," i.e., a 14th Amendment "citizen of the United States." Although one can never know who actually knows what, the chances are overwhelmingly large that the vast majority of doctors and hospital personnel are as ignorant of how badly they’ve been had as the rest of their fellow countrymen. Part of the cleverness of the sting is that it has been structured so that the people end up policing and being policed by each other without ever knowing whose agenda they are actually fulfilling. It is possible that Henry Ford was correct in his celebrated statement: "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."

[4] The three means of ratifying an implied contract, i.e., a unilateral offer from the system to you, are: 1) Do nothing; 2) Accept benefits from the system; 3) Fail to know, declare, and properly notice the appropriate parties in the system of your applicable law.

[5] A given name sounds the same when spoken, regardless of whether the spelling on paper consists of all-capital letters (the strawman) or upper- and lower-case letters (symbolically representing the real being).

[6] The nature of the existing scenario is not, for instance, on the curriculum of any institution of public education, nor is it discussed in the media, news, law schools, etc. Obviously no con that is explained by the con man remains a con.